Feasibility of Cricothyroid Muscle Needle Electrode for Monitored Thyroidectomy.

IF 2.2 3区 医学 Q3 MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL
Laryngoscope Pub Date : 2025-02-13 DOI:10.1002/lary.32051
Wen Liang Joel Lau, Che-Wei Wu, Man Hon Tang, Han Boon Oh, Wei Keat Cheah, Moon Young Oh, Young Jun Chai
{"title":"Feasibility of Cricothyroid Muscle Needle Electrode for Monitored Thyroidectomy.","authors":"Wen Liang Joel Lau, Che-Wei Wu, Man Hon Tang, Han Boon Oh, Wei Keat Cheah, Moon Young Oh, Young Jun Chai","doi":"10.1002/lary.32051","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Preservation of the recurrent laryngeal nerve (RLN) and external branch of the superior laryngeal nerve (EBSLN) is essential to maintain voice function after thyroidectomy. Intraoperative neuromonitoring (IONM) assists in nerve preservation. This study compares three IONM modalities, endotracheal surface electrode (ETSE), thyroid cartilage needle electrodes (TCNE), and cricothyroid muscle needle electrode (CTNE), in their monitoring of laryngeal muscle electromyographic (EMG) amplitude.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>An observational prospective cohort study included 29 patients (21F:8M) undergoing thyroidectomy for Bethesda III-VI nodules or benign nodules >4 cm. EMG amplitudes were recorded via ETSE, TCNE, and CTNE following stimulation of the EBSLN, RLN, and vagus nerve (VN).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 105 nerves at risk were assessed, including 35 EBSLNs, 35 VNs, and 35 RLNs. The recorded amplitudes at S1 for the ETSE, TCNE, and CTNE were 45.6 ± 60.7 μV, 403.7 ± 865.4 μV, and 3049.4 ± 2749.8 μV. The CTNE demonstrate significantly higher S1 amplitudes and positive signal rates compared with both the TCNE and ETSE (p < 0.001). For V1, the recorded amplitudes for the ETSE, TCNE, and CTNE were 453.7 ± 406.7 μV, 1363.9 ± 1063.6 μV, and 700 ± 375.1 μV. For R1, the recorded amplitudes for the ETSE, TCNE, and CTNE were 567.1 ± 556 μV, 1544.6 ± 1269.6 μV, and 720.4 ± 363.1 μV. With a threshold of 100 μV to determine positive signal, CTNE detected all EBSLN, VN, and RLN signals, whereas TC missed 13 cases (37.1%) of EBSLN.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The CTNE showed a higher positive signal rate than ETSE and TCNE in detection of EBSLN, whereas it showed similar performance with TCNE in detection of VN and RLN. CTNE is a viable option for IONM during thyroidectomy.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>2 Laryngoscope, 2025.</p>","PeriodicalId":49921,"journal":{"name":"Laryngoscope","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Laryngoscope","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/lary.32051","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: Preservation of the recurrent laryngeal nerve (RLN) and external branch of the superior laryngeal nerve (EBSLN) is essential to maintain voice function after thyroidectomy. Intraoperative neuromonitoring (IONM) assists in nerve preservation. This study compares three IONM modalities, endotracheal surface electrode (ETSE), thyroid cartilage needle electrodes (TCNE), and cricothyroid muscle needle electrode (CTNE), in their monitoring of laryngeal muscle electromyographic (EMG) amplitude.

Methods: An observational prospective cohort study included 29 patients (21F:8M) undergoing thyroidectomy for Bethesda III-VI nodules or benign nodules >4 cm. EMG amplitudes were recorded via ETSE, TCNE, and CTNE following stimulation of the EBSLN, RLN, and vagus nerve (VN).

Results: A total of 105 nerves at risk were assessed, including 35 EBSLNs, 35 VNs, and 35 RLNs. The recorded amplitudes at S1 for the ETSE, TCNE, and CTNE were 45.6 ± 60.7 μV, 403.7 ± 865.4 μV, and 3049.4 ± 2749.8 μV. The CTNE demonstrate significantly higher S1 amplitudes and positive signal rates compared with both the TCNE and ETSE (p < 0.001). For V1, the recorded amplitudes for the ETSE, TCNE, and CTNE were 453.7 ± 406.7 μV, 1363.9 ± 1063.6 μV, and 700 ± 375.1 μV. For R1, the recorded amplitudes for the ETSE, TCNE, and CTNE were 567.1 ± 556 μV, 1544.6 ± 1269.6 μV, and 720.4 ± 363.1 μV. With a threshold of 100 μV to determine positive signal, CTNE detected all EBSLN, VN, and RLN signals, whereas TC missed 13 cases (37.1%) of EBSLN.

Conclusion: The CTNE showed a higher positive signal rate than ETSE and TCNE in detection of EBSLN, whereas it showed similar performance with TCNE in detection of VN and RLN. CTNE is a viable option for IONM during thyroidectomy.

Level of evidence: 2 Laryngoscope, 2025.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Laryngoscope
Laryngoscope 医学-耳鼻喉科学
CiteScore
6.50
自引率
7.70%
发文量
500
审稿时长
2-4 weeks
期刊介绍: The Laryngoscope has been the leading source of information on advances in the diagnosis and treatment of head and neck disorders since 1890. The Laryngoscope is the first choice among otolaryngologists for publication of their important findings and techniques. Each monthly issue of The Laryngoscope features peer-reviewed medical, clinical, and research contributions in general otolaryngology, allergy/rhinology, otology/neurotology, laryngology/bronchoesophagology, head and neck surgery, sleep medicine, pediatric otolaryngology, facial plastics and reconstructive surgery, oncology, and communicative disorders. Contributions include papers and posters presented at the Annual and Section Meetings of the Triological Society, as well as independent papers, "How I Do It", "Triological Best Practice" articles, and contemporary reviews. Theses authored by the Triological Society’s new Fellows as well as papers presented at meetings of the American Laryngological Association are published in The Laryngoscope. • Broncho-esophagology • Communicative disorders • Head and neck surgery • Plastic and reconstructive facial surgery • Oncology • Speech and hearing defects
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信