Context matters: Speech-language pathologists' perceptions of the impact of barriers and facilitators on culturally responsive professional practice.

IF 1.4 4区 医学 Q3 AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY
Sarah Masso, Taiying Lee, Natalie Munro, Anita M-Y Wong, Wing Yan Sophie Li, Elise Baker
{"title":"Context matters: Speech-language pathologists' perceptions of the impact of barriers and facilitators on culturally responsive professional practice.","authors":"Sarah Masso, Taiying Lee, Natalie Munro, Anita M-Y Wong, Wing Yan Sophie Li, Elise Baker","doi":"10.1080/17549507.2025.2459177","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The impact of known barriers and facilitators to culturally responsive practice in paediatric speech-language pathology services across different social, linguistic, and educational contexts is not well understood. An innovative data visualisation method was used to determine which barriers and facilitators most impacted different professional activities as reported by speech-language pathologists practising in Australia and Hong Kong.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>A total of 111 speech-language pathologists in Australia and 76 in Hong Kong completed a survey with questions related to barriers and facilitators when working with families from diverse multilingual backgrounds. Descriptive statistics and correspondence analysis were used to explore relationships between professional activities and the barriers and facilitators in both contexts.</p><p><strong>Result: </strong>Correspondence analysis revealed that barriers impacted the two contexts more distinctively than the facilitators. Two activities most strongly impacted by barriers in both contexts included engagement in management and communication. Regarding facilitators, speech-language pathologists in both contexts indicated that cultural awareness most facilitated the development of rapport and knowledge of language most facilitated diagnosis.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The impact of barriers was more varied between contexts which may be due to the different health and educational contexts that speech-language pathologists work in. In contrast, facilitative factors may be more robust and stable across these two cultural contexts.</p>","PeriodicalId":49047,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Speech-Language Pathology","volume":" ","pages":"1-13"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Speech-Language Pathology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17549507.2025.2459177","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: The impact of known barriers and facilitators to culturally responsive practice in paediatric speech-language pathology services across different social, linguistic, and educational contexts is not well understood. An innovative data visualisation method was used to determine which barriers and facilitators most impacted different professional activities as reported by speech-language pathologists practising in Australia and Hong Kong.

Method: A total of 111 speech-language pathologists in Australia and 76 in Hong Kong completed a survey with questions related to barriers and facilitators when working with families from diverse multilingual backgrounds. Descriptive statistics and correspondence analysis were used to explore relationships between professional activities and the barriers and facilitators in both contexts.

Result: Correspondence analysis revealed that barriers impacted the two contexts more distinctively than the facilitators. Two activities most strongly impacted by barriers in both contexts included engagement in management and communication. Regarding facilitators, speech-language pathologists in both contexts indicated that cultural awareness most facilitated the development of rapport and knowledge of language most facilitated diagnosis.

Conclusion: The impact of barriers was more varied between contexts which may be due to the different health and educational contexts that speech-language pathologists work in. In contrast, facilitative factors may be more robust and stable across these two cultural contexts.

语境问题:语言病理学家对文化反应专业实践中障碍和促进者影响的看法。
目的:在不同的社会、语言和教育背景下,已知的障碍和促进因素对儿科语言病理学服务中文化响应实践的影响尚未得到很好的理解。根据在澳大利亚和香港执业的语言病理学家的报告,我们使用了一种创新的数据可视化方法来确定哪些障碍和促进因素对不同的专业活动影响最大。方法:澳大利亚的111名言语语言病理学家和香港的76名言语语言病理学家完成了一项调查,调查的问题涉及与不同多语言背景的家庭合作时的障碍和促进因素。采用描述性统计和对应分析来探讨两种情况下专业活动与障碍和促进因素之间的关系。结果:对应分析显示障碍对两种情境的影响比促进因素更显著。在这两种情况下,受障碍影响最严重的两项活动包括参与管理和沟通。在促进因素方面,两种情况下的言语语言病理学家都指出,文化意识最能促进融洽关系的发展,语言知识最能促进诊断。结论:障碍的影响在不同的环境中差异更大,这可能是由于语言病理学家工作的不同的健康和教育环境。相反,在这两种文化背景下,促进因素可能更加强大和稳定。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
International Journal of Speech-Language Pathology
International Journal of Speech-Language Pathology AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY-REHABILITATION
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
16.70%
发文量
73
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: International Journal of Speech-Language Pathology is an international journal which promotes discussion on a broad range of current clinical and theoretical issues. Submissions may include experimental, review and theoretical discussion papers, with studies from either quantitative and/or qualitative frameworks. Articles may relate to any area of child or adult communication or dysphagia, furthering knowledge on issues related to etiology, assessment, diagnosis, intervention, or theoretical frameworks. Articles can be accompanied by supplementary audio and video files that will be uploaded to the journal’s website. Special issues on contemporary topics are published at least once a year. A scientific forum is included in many issues, where a topic is debated by invited international experts.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信