Assessment of the benefits of bone modifying agents in the management of advanced breast, prostate, and lung cancers.

IF 1.9 4区 医学 Q3 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Jennifer Leigh, Shing Fung Lee, Ali Fawaz, Jason Jia, Christopher F Theriau, Jessica Rodrigues, Janet Brown, Terry L Ng
{"title":"Assessment of the benefits of bone modifying agents in the management of advanced breast, prostate, and lung cancers.","authors":"Jennifer Leigh, Shing Fung Lee, Ali Fawaz, Jason Jia, Christopher F Theriau, Jessica Rodrigues, Janet Brown, Terry L Ng","doi":"10.1097/SPC.0000000000000749","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose of review: </strong>Skeletal metastases occur in approximately 80% of advanced breast, 70% of advanced prostate, and 30% of lung cancers, and place patients at increased risk of skeletal related events (SRE). Bone modifying agents (BMAs) have been shown to prevent or delay SRE development. Our objective was to summarize the role of these agents in the management of these three cancers.</p><p><strong>Recent findings: </strong>Total 52 studies met our inclusion criteria. These highlighted the benefit of BMAs in reducing SREs in metastatic breast and castrate resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC), with less clear impact on reducing SRE in lung cancer, or on improving progression-free and overall survival due to significant heterogeneity in trial design and outcomes. Benefits in SRE reduction occurred with bisphosphonates and denosumab, however when compared, denosumab was superior. Denosumab however is not more cost effective, and multiple trials support potential de-escalation to either 12 weekly dosing or other reduced duration.</p><p><strong>Summary: </strong>There is a large body of evidence to support the role of BMAs in reducing SREs in metastatic breast and mCRPC. Impact on survival outcomes is heterogeneous, and future large database trials would be helpful in identifying which subgroups of patients truly have survival benefit from BMAs.</p>","PeriodicalId":48837,"journal":{"name":"Current Opinion in Supportive and Palliative Care","volume":" ","pages":"117-129"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Opinion in Supportive and Palliative Care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/SPC.0000000000000749","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/14 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose of review: Skeletal metastases occur in approximately 80% of advanced breast, 70% of advanced prostate, and 30% of lung cancers, and place patients at increased risk of skeletal related events (SRE). Bone modifying agents (BMAs) have been shown to prevent or delay SRE development. Our objective was to summarize the role of these agents in the management of these three cancers.

Recent findings: Total 52 studies met our inclusion criteria. These highlighted the benefit of BMAs in reducing SREs in metastatic breast and castrate resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC), with less clear impact on reducing SRE in lung cancer, or on improving progression-free and overall survival due to significant heterogeneity in trial design and outcomes. Benefits in SRE reduction occurred with bisphosphonates and denosumab, however when compared, denosumab was superior. Denosumab however is not more cost effective, and multiple trials support potential de-escalation to either 12 weekly dosing or other reduced duration.

Summary: There is a large body of evidence to support the role of BMAs in reducing SREs in metastatic breast and mCRPC. Impact on survival outcomes is heterogeneous, and future large database trials would be helpful in identifying which subgroups of patients truly have survival benefit from BMAs.

评估骨修饰剂在晚期乳腺癌、前列腺癌和肺癌治疗中的益处。
综述目的:骨骼转移发生在大约80%的晚期乳腺癌、70%的晚期前列腺癌和30%的肺癌中,并使患者处于骨骼相关事件(SRE)的风险增加。骨修饰剂(BMAs)已被证明可以预防或延缓SRE的发展。我们的目的是总结这些药物在这三种癌症的治疗中的作用。最新发现:总共52项研究符合我们的纳入标准。这些都强调了bma在降低转移性乳腺癌和去势抵抗性前列腺癌(mCRPC)的SRE方面的益处,但由于试验设计和结果的显著异质性,bma对降低肺癌SRE或改善无进展生存期和总生存期的影响不太明显。双膦酸盐和denosumab在SRE降低方面有益处,但是当比较时,denosumab更优越。然而,Denosumab的成本效益并不高,多项试验支持将剂量降低到12周或其他缩短的持续时间。总结:有大量证据支持BMAs在降低转移性乳腺癌和mCRPC的SREs中的作用。对生存结果的影响是异构的,未来的大型数据库试验将有助于确定哪些亚组患者真正从bma中获得生存益处。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Current Opinion in Supportive and Palliative Care
Current Opinion in Supportive and Palliative Care HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES-
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
54
期刊介绍: A reader-friendly resource, Current Opinion in Supportive and Palliative Care provides an up-to-date account of the most important advances in the field of supportive and palliative care. Each issue contains either two or three sections delivering a diverse and comprehensive coverage of all the key issues, including end-of-life management, gastrointestinal systems and respiratory problems. Current Opinion in Supportive and Palliative Care is an indispensable journal for the busy clinician, researcher or student.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信