The Impact of Preoperative Visits Using the Omaha System on Patients Undergoing Transurethral Resection of the Prostate: Improvement in Sleep Quality and Negative Psychological Aspects.

IF 0.6 4区 医学 Q4 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY
Miaomiao Geng, Chenghong Xiang, Jing Huang
{"title":"The Impact of Preoperative Visits Using the Omaha System on Patients Undergoing Transurethral Resection of the Prostate: Improvement in Sleep Quality and Negative Psychological Aspects.","authors":"Miaomiao Geng, Chenghong Xiang, Jing Huang","doi":"10.56434/j.arch.esp.urol.20257801.7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The Omaha System, recognised for its comprehensive approach that encompasses physical, psychosocial, and environmental factors, has shown promise in improving patient outcomes across various healthcare settings. This study aimed to investigate the impact of preoperative visits conducted using the Omaha System on patients undergoing transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP), with a specific focus on sleep quality and negative psychological aspects.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective cohort study was conducted, including patients scheduled for TURP between March 2022 and March 2024. Patients were categorised into two groups based on the preoperative visit methods: Traditional preoperative visits and those utilising the Omaha System. A total of 120 patients were included in the study, with 68 patients experiencing traditional preoperative visits and 52 patients receiving visits using the Omaha System. Various parameters, including sleep quality, psychological aspects, and clinical characteristics, were assessed and analysed both preoperatively and postoperatively.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Preoperatively, there were no significant differences in sleep quality parameters or negative psychological aspects between the two groups. However, postoperatively, the group that received preoperative visits using the Omaha System demonstrated significant improvements in sleep quality, including the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI) global score (<i>p</i> = 0.015), sleep latency (<i>p</i> = 0.043), sleep duration (<i>p</i> = 0.002), sleep efficiency (<i>p</i> = 0.004), and sleep disturbances (<i>p</i> = 0.004). Additionally, reductions in anxiety (<i>p</i> = 0.006), depression (<i>p</i> = 0.028), stress (<i>p</i> = 0.025), fear related to the surgery (<i>p</i> = 0.009), and uncertainty (<i>p</i> = 0.005) were observed postoperatively in the Omaha System group compared to the traditional visit group.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The implementation of preoperative visits using the Omaha System significantly improved postoperative sleep quality and reduced negative psychological aspects among patients undergoing TURP.</p>","PeriodicalId":48852,"journal":{"name":"Archivos Espanoles De Urologia","volume":"78 1","pages":"56-62"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archivos Espanoles De Urologia","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.56434/j.arch.esp.urol.20257801.7","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The Omaha System, recognised for its comprehensive approach that encompasses physical, psychosocial, and environmental factors, has shown promise in improving patient outcomes across various healthcare settings. This study aimed to investigate the impact of preoperative visits conducted using the Omaha System on patients undergoing transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP), with a specific focus on sleep quality and negative psychological aspects.

Methods: A retrospective cohort study was conducted, including patients scheduled for TURP between March 2022 and March 2024. Patients were categorised into two groups based on the preoperative visit methods: Traditional preoperative visits and those utilising the Omaha System. A total of 120 patients were included in the study, with 68 patients experiencing traditional preoperative visits and 52 patients receiving visits using the Omaha System. Various parameters, including sleep quality, psychological aspects, and clinical characteristics, were assessed and analysed both preoperatively and postoperatively.

Results: Preoperatively, there were no significant differences in sleep quality parameters or negative psychological aspects between the two groups. However, postoperatively, the group that received preoperative visits using the Omaha System demonstrated significant improvements in sleep quality, including the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI) global score (p = 0.015), sleep latency (p = 0.043), sleep duration (p = 0.002), sleep efficiency (p = 0.004), and sleep disturbances (p = 0.004). Additionally, reductions in anxiety (p = 0.006), depression (p = 0.028), stress (p = 0.025), fear related to the surgery (p = 0.009), and uncertainty (p = 0.005) were observed postoperatively in the Omaha System group compared to the traditional visit group.

Conclusions: The implementation of preoperative visits using the Omaha System significantly improved postoperative sleep quality and reduced negative psychological aspects among patients undergoing TURP.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Archivos Espanoles De Urologia
Archivos Espanoles De Urologia UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY-
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
111
期刊介绍: Archivos Españoles de Urología published since 1944, is an international peer review, susbscription Journal on Urology with original and review articles on different subjets in Urology: oncology, endourology, laparoscopic, andrology, lithiasis, pediatrics , urodynamics,... Case Report are also admitted.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信