The effect of inner limiting membrane peeling on visual fields: Unravelling a source of bias in glaucoma management.

IF 1.2 Q4 OPHTHALMOLOGY
Saudi Journal of Ophthalmology Pub Date : 2024-09-16 eCollection Date: 2024-10-01 DOI:10.4103/sjopt.sjopt_156_24
Meryem Nurkan, Jan V Eijgen, Ivo De Clerck, Ingeborg Stalmans, João Barbosa-Breda
{"title":"The effect of inner limiting membrane peeling on visual fields: Unravelling a source of bias in glaucoma management.","authors":"Meryem Nurkan, Jan V Eijgen, Ivo De Clerck, Ingeborg Stalmans, João Barbosa-Breda","doi":"10.4103/sjopt.sjopt_156_24","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Pars plana vitrectomy (PPV) with inner limiting membrane (ILM) peeling aims to improve visual function. Previous studies have focused on visual acuity, often neglecting visual field (VF) changes. This systematic review examines VF changes after PPV with ILM peeling in patients with epiretinal membrane (ERM) or macular hole (MH), including those with glaucoma, who have preexisting VF damage, to identify potential biases in glaucoma management. The inclusion criteria were as follows: (A) Patients undergoing ILM peeling for ERM or MH and (B) VF outcomes assessed through standard automated perimetry (SAP) or Goldmann kinetic perimetry. Exclusions were non-English studies and those with fewer than 30 subjects. Data included retinal disease, demographics, VF outcomes (mean deviation [MD], pattern standard deviation, and central VF sensitivity [CVFS]), study design, and use of stains. Out of 612 studies, 23 met our criteria. Of these, four included glaucoma patients and seven involved concomitant phacoemulsification. In glaucoma patients, two studies showed MD improvement in the central 24°, while one showed deterioration in the central 10°, linked to worse preoperative MD and older age. Among studies without glaucoma patients, three of eight using SAP reported increased VF defects (VFDs); two showed lower outer nasal CVFS postoperatively. Indocyanine green staining was linked to higher VFD incidence while triamcinolone acetonide or tryptane blue staining led to no significant VFDs. The nasal half of the central VF was more affected, possibly due to retinal ganglion cell distribution. Further prospective studies, including randomized controlled trials, are needed to better understand ILM-peeling effects.</p>","PeriodicalId":46810,"journal":{"name":"Saudi Journal of Ophthalmology","volume":"38 4","pages":"332-342"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11811406/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Saudi Journal of Ophthalmology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/sjopt.sjopt_156_24","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/10/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Pars plana vitrectomy (PPV) with inner limiting membrane (ILM) peeling aims to improve visual function. Previous studies have focused on visual acuity, often neglecting visual field (VF) changes. This systematic review examines VF changes after PPV with ILM peeling in patients with epiretinal membrane (ERM) or macular hole (MH), including those with glaucoma, who have preexisting VF damage, to identify potential biases in glaucoma management. The inclusion criteria were as follows: (A) Patients undergoing ILM peeling for ERM or MH and (B) VF outcomes assessed through standard automated perimetry (SAP) or Goldmann kinetic perimetry. Exclusions were non-English studies and those with fewer than 30 subjects. Data included retinal disease, demographics, VF outcomes (mean deviation [MD], pattern standard deviation, and central VF sensitivity [CVFS]), study design, and use of stains. Out of 612 studies, 23 met our criteria. Of these, four included glaucoma patients and seven involved concomitant phacoemulsification. In glaucoma patients, two studies showed MD improvement in the central 24°, while one showed deterioration in the central 10°, linked to worse preoperative MD and older age. Among studies without glaucoma patients, three of eight using SAP reported increased VF defects (VFDs); two showed lower outer nasal CVFS postoperatively. Indocyanine green staining was linked to higher VFD incidence while triamcinolone acetonide or tryptane blue staining led to no significant VFDs. The nasal half of the central VF was more affected, possibly due to retinal ganglion cell distribution. Further prospective studies, including randomized controlled trials, are needed to better understand ILM-peeling effects.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

内限制膜剥离对视野的影响:揭示青光眼治疗中的一个偏差来源。
玻璃体部分切除术(PPV)联合内限定膜(ILM)剥离的目的是改善视觉功能。以往的研究主要集中在视觉敏锐度上,往往忽略了视野的变化。本系统综述研究了视网膜前膜(ERM)或黄斑孔(MH)患者(包括青光眼患者)在视网膜前膜(ERM)或黄斑孔(MH)患者PPV伴ILM剥落后的VF变化,以确定青光眼治疗的潜在偏差。纳入标准如下:(A)因ERM或MH接受ILM剥离的患者;(B)通过标准自动视距仪(SAP)或Goldmann动力学视距仪评估VF结果。排除非英语研究和少于30个受试者的研究。数据包括视网膜疾病、人口统计学、VF结果(平均偏差[MD]、模式标准差和中心VF敏感性[CVFS])、研究设计和染色剂的使用。在612项研究中,有23项符合我们的标准。其中4例为青光眼患者,7例伴有超声乳化术。在青光眼患者中,两项研究显示中央24°的MD改善,而一项研究显示中央10°的MD恶化,这与术前MD恶化和年龄增加有关。在没有青光眼患者的研究中,使用SAP的8个研究中有3个报告了VF缺陷(vfd)增加;2例术后出现下外鼻CVFS。吲哚菁绿染色与较高的VFD发生率有关,而曲安奈德或tryptane blue染色则不会导致明显的VFD。中央VF的鼻部部分受影响更大,可能与视网膜神经节细胞分布有关。进一步的前瞻性研究,包括随机对照试验,需要更好地了解ilm剥离效应。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
79
审稿时长
13 weeks
期刊介绍: Saudi Journal of Ophthalmology is an English language, peer-reviewed scholarly publication in the area of ophthalmology. Saudi Journal of Ophthalmology publishes original papers, clinical studies, reviews and case reports. Saudi Journal of Ophthalmology is the official publication of the Saudi Ophthalmological Society and is published by King Saud University in collaboration with Elsevier and is edited by an international group of eminent researchers.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信