Effectiveness of cognitive behavioral therapy vs conservative pain management for occupational performance in patients with low back pain: a systematic review protocol.

IF 1.5 Q3 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
JBI evidence synthesis Pub Date : 2025-02-01 Epub Date: 2025-02-12 DOI:10.11124/JBIES-23-00480
Gemiele Elaine Delasas, Ninfa Mae Delgado, Isabelle Kezia Mojica, Stepanie Ragasa, Valentin Dones, Donald Manlapaz
{"title":"Effectiveness of cognitive behavioral therapy vs conservative pain management for occupational performance in patients with low back pain: a systematic review protocol.","authors":"Gemiele Elaine Delasas, Ninfa Mae Delgado, Isabelle Kezia Mojica, Stepanie Ragasa, Valentin Dones, Donald Manlapaz","doi":"10.11124/JBIES-23-00480","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This review aims to evaluate the effectiveness of cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) compared with conservative pain management for improving the occupational performance of individuals with low back pain.</p><p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Low back pain is a condition that describes pain between the lower edge of ribs and the buttocks. It is projected to affect 843 million people by 2050, with significant economic and occupational consequences. CBT is a growing treatment for chronic pain that aims to change maladaptive thoughts and behaviors. This review will examine the effectiveness of CBT for improving occupational performance.</p><p><strong>Inclusion criteria: </strong>The review will focus on the effect of CBT on adults with musculoskeletal low back pain, whether acute, subacute, or chronic. It will analyze randomized controlled trials, cohort studies, case-control studies, and quasi-experimental studies to assess CBT's impact on occupational performance, including activities of daily living, work, and sleep.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Two independent reviewers will screen titles, abstracts, and full-text manuscripts from PubMed, CINAHL (EBSCOhost), Web of Science Core Collection, Cochrane Library, OTSeeker, and ScienceDirect. Unpublished studies and gray literature will also be searched in ClinicalTrials.gov, Google Scholar, World Health Organization, and ProQuest Dissertations and Theses. A subgroup analysis will explore the effects of CBT on post-treatment outcomes, identifying sources of heterogeneity in its impact on activities of daily living, work, and sleep. Factors such as CBT type, delivery method, participant age, and low back pain chronicity will be considered. The Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) approach will assess evidence certainty, and a Summary of Findings will be provided.</p><p><strong>Registration number: </strong>PROSPERO CRD42023472522.</p>","PeriodicalId":36399,"journal":{"name":"JBI evidence synthesis","volume":"23 2","pages":"365-371"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JBI evidence synthesis","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.11124/JBIES-23-00480","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/12 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: This review aims to evaluate the effectiveness of cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) compared with conservative pain management for improving the occupational performance of individuals with low back pain.

Introduction: Low back pain is a condition that describes pain between the lower edge of ribs and the buttocks. It is projected to affect 843 million people by 2050, with significant economic and occupational consequences. CBT is a growing treatment for chronic pain that aims to change maladaptive thoughts and behaviors. This review will examine the effectiveness of CBT for improving occupational performance.

Inclusion criteria: The review will focus on the effect of CBT on adults with musculoskeletal low back pain, whether acute, subacute, or chronic. It will analyze randomized controlled trials, cohort studies, case-control studies, and quasi-experimental studies to assess CBT's impact on occupational performance, including activities of daily living, work, and sleep.

Methods: Two independent reviewers will screen titles, abstracts, and full-text manuscripts from PubMed, CINAHL (EBSCOhost), Web of Science Core Collection, Cochrane Library, OTSeeker, and ScienceDirect. Unpublished studies and gray literature will also be searched in ClinicalTrials.gov, Google Scholar, World Health Organization, and ProQuest Dissertations and Theses. A subgroup analysis will explore the effects of CBT on post-treatment outcomes, identifying sources of heterogeneity in its impact on activities of daily living, work, and sleep. Factors such as CBT type, delivery method, participant age, and low back pain chronicity will be considered. The Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) approach will assess evidence certainty, and a Summary of Findings will be provided.

Registration number: PROSPERO CRD42023472522.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
JBI evidence synthesis
JBI evidence synthesis Nursing-Nursing (all)
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
3.70%
发文量
218
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信