Significant Dissatisfaction with the Anachronistic System: A Survey on The Experience of Application for Off-Label Use of Anti-Cancer Drugs by Korean Society of Medical Oncology.

IF 4.1 2区 医学 Q2 ONCOLOGY
Jae Lyun Lee, Dong-Hoe Koo, Young-Woong Won, Young Saing Kim, Hee Kyung Ahn, Seungtaek Lim
{"title":"Significant Dissatisfaction with the Anachronistic System: A Survey on The Experience of Application for Off-Label Use of Anti-Cancer Drugs by Korean Society of Medical Oncology.","authors":"Jae Lyun Lee, Dong-Hoe Koo, Young-Woong Won, Young Saing Kim, Hee Kyung Ahn, Seungtaek Lim","doi":"10.4143/crt.2024.749","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This study evaluates the experiences and satisfaction levels of Korean medical oncologists with the prior authorization system for the off-label use of anti-cancer drugs. Conducted by the Korean Society of Medical Oncology (KSMO), the survey aimed to identify challenges and areas for improvement in the current regulatory framework.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>A cross-sectional web-based survey was carried out between May 4 and May 14, 2023, targeting 261 active KSMO medical oncologists. Invitations were sent via email, and the survey, comprising 19 questions, was hosted on Microsoft Forms. The questions covered personal characteristics, work environment, experiences with the pre-application process, and post-approval experiences.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>For the 261 invitations sent, 110 responses (42.1%) were received. Most respondents had over 10 years of experience and worked in tertiary hospitals. Although 93.6% were familiar with the pre-application system, 67.3% expressed moderate to high dissatisfaction. The key issues included complex applications, long approval period, stringent criteria, and inconsistent reviews. Additionally, 74.4% respondents spent over 3 hours on first-time applications, with 68.3% experiencing rejections. Emotional responses to rejections were largely negative, with many feeling disregarded. Post-approval, patients of 96.8% respondents faced financial burdens leading to treatment discontinuation. Most oncologists (86.0%) supported selective reimbursement if the disease was controlled for a certain period.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The survey highlights significant dissatisfaction with the current system, suggesting the need for streamlining the application process, easing approval criteria, and reconsidering the financial aspects of post-approval treatments to support patient care and oncologists' decision-making autonomy.</p>","PeriodicalId":49094,"journal":{"name":"Cancer Research and Treatment","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cancer Research and Treatment","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4143/crt.2024.749","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: This study evaluates the experiences and satisfaction levels of Korean medical oncologists with the prior authorization system for the off-label use of anti-cancer drugs. Conducted by the Korean Society of Medical Oncology (KSMO), the survey aimed to identify challenges and areas for improvement in the current regulatory framework.

Materials and methods: A cross-sectional web-based survey was carried out between May 4 and May 14, 2023, targeting 261 active KSMO medical oncologists. Invitations were sent via email, and the survey, comprising 19 questions, was hosted on Microsoft Forms. The questions covered personal characteristics, work environment, experiences with the pre-application process, and post-approval experiences.

Results: For the 261 invitations sent, 110 responses (42.1%) were received. Most respondents had over 10 years of experience and worked in tertiary hospitals. Although 93.6% were familiar with the pre-application system, 67.3% expressed moderate to high dissatisfaction. The key issues included complex applications, long approval period, stringent criteria, and inconsistent reviews. Additionally, 74.4% respondents spent over 3 hours on first-time applications, with 68.3% experiencing rejections. Emotional responses to rejections were largely negative, with many feeling disregarded. Post-approval, patients of 96.8% respondents faced financial burdens leading to treatment discontinuation. Most oncologists (86.0%) supported selective reimbursement if the disease was controlled for a certain period.

Conclusion: The survey highlights significant dissatisfaction with the current system, suggesting the need for streamlining the application process, easing approval criteria, and reconsidering the financial aspects of post-approval treatments to support patient care and oncologists' decision-making autonomy.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.00
自引率
2.20%
发文量
126
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Cancer Research and Treatment is a peer-reviewed open access publication of the Korean Cancer Association. It is published quarterly, one volume per year. Abbreviated title is Cancer Res Treat. It accepts manuscripts relevant to experimental and clinical cancer research. Subjects include carcinogenesis, tumor biology, molecular oncology, cancer genetics, tumor immunology, epidemiology, predictive markers and cancer prevention, pathology, cancer diagnosis, screening and therapies including chemotherapy, surgery, radiation therapy, immunotherapy, gene therapy, multimodality treatment and palliative care.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信