Early acupuncture intervention for pain relief in emergency department patients with suspected acute renal colic caused by urinary calculi: A randomized clinical trial.

IF 7.3 4区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Ying Cao, Zhicheng Qu, Shuwen Zhang, Yunhua Liu, Liancheng Jia, Xiaolu Pei, Xiao Wang, Dantong Zhang, Binyan Li, Haitian Lu, Maoyu Ding, Yinglu Bai, Shuang Wang, Yufei Yang, Jing Hu, Wei Peng, Wei Guo, Xiaolong Xu, Qingquan Liu
{"title":"Early acupuncture intervention for pain relief in emergency department patients with suspected acute renal colic caused by urinary calculi: A randomized clinical trial.","authors":"Ying Cao, Zhicheng Qu, Shuwen Zhang, Yunhua Liu, Liancheng Jia, Xiaolu Pei, Xiao Wang, Dantong Zhang, Binyan Li, Haitian Lu, Maoyu Ding, Yinglu Bai, Shuang Wang, Yufei Yang, Jing Hu, Wei Peng, Wei Guo, Xiaolong Xu, Qingquan Liu","doi":"10.1093/qjmed/hcaf011","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Renal colic is one of the worst types of pain in acute renal colic caused by urinary calculi (ARCUC). We previously proved that acupuncture can alleviate the pain in ARCUC patients, but its effect on suspected ARCUC remains unclear.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>The objective was to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of acupuncture in patients with suspected ARCUC.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>This prospective, double-blind, sham acupuncture-controlled, randomized clinical trial was conducted from July 2021 to June 2024 in an emergency department in China.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The patients immediately received acupuncture treatment or sham acupuncture treatment after randomization.The primary outcome was the response rate at 10 minutes (pain relief rate) after needle manipulation.The secondary outcomes included the response rates at 0, 5, 15, 20, and 30 minutes, trends in the NRS score over time, patient satisfaction, the analgesic injection rate at 30 minutes, the surgical intervention rate, the revisit rate, and the occurrence of adverse events.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>This trial enrolled 84 participants with suspected ARCUC patients, who immediately received acupuncture treatment or sham treatment after randomization. The pain response rates at 10 minutes were 64.3% and 16.7% in the acupuncture group and sham group, respectively, and the difference between the groups was 47.6% (95% CI, 29.3% to 66%; P < 0.01). The response rates of acupuncture were also significantly higher than those of sham acupuncture at 0, 5, 15, 20, and 30 minutes.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>These results suggest that acupuncture could alleviate the pain in patients with suspected ARCUC safely.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>Chinese Clinical Trial Registry: ChiCTR2100049069.</p>","PeriodicalId":20806,"journal":{"name":"QJM: An International Journal of Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":7.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"QJM: An International Journal of Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/qjmed/hcaf011","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Renal colic is one of the worst types of pain in acute renal colic caused by urinary calculi (ARCUC). We previously proved that acupuncture can alleviate the pain in ARCUC patients, but its effect on suspected ARCUC remains unclear.

Objective: The objective was to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of acupuncture in patients with suspected ARCUC.

Design: This prospective, double-blind, sham acupuncture-controlled, randomized clinical trial was conducted from July 2021 to June 2024 in an emergency department in China.

Methods: The patients immediately received acupuncture treatment or sham acupuncture treatment after randomization.The primary outcome was the response rate at 10 minutes (pain relief rate) after needle manipulation.The secondary outcomes included the response rates at 0, 5, 15, 20, and 30 minutes, trends in the NRS score over time, patient satisfaction, the analgesic injection rate at 30 minutes, the surgical intervention rate, the revisit rate, and the occurrence of adverse events.

Results: This trial enrolled 84 participants with suspected ARCUC patients, who immediately received acupuncture treatment or sham treatment after randomization. The pain response rates at 10 minutes were 64.3% and 16.7% in the acupuncture group and sham group, respectively, and the difference between the groups was 47.6% (95% CI, 29.3% to 66%; P < 0.01). The response rates of acupuncture were also significantly higher than those of sham acupuncture at 0, 5, 15, 20, and 30 minutes.

Conclusions: These results suggest that acupuncture could alleviate the pain in patients with suspected ARCUC safely.

Trial registration: Chinese Clinical Trial Registry: ChiCTR2100049069.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.90
自引率
5.30%
发文量
263
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: QJM, a renowned and reputable general medical journal, has been a prominent source of knowledge in the field of internal medicine. With a steadfast commitment to advancing medical science and practice, it features a selection of rigorously reviewed articles. Released on a monthly basis, QJM encompasses a wide range of article types. These include original papers that contribute innovative research, editorials that offer expert opinions, and reviews that provide comprehensive analyses of specific topics. The journal also presents commentary papers aimed at initiating discussions on controversial subjects and allocates a dedicated section for reader correspondence. In summary, QJM's reputable standing stems from its enduring presence in the medical community, consistent publication schedule, and diverse range of content designed to inform and engage readers.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信