Global precedence effects account for individual differences in taxonomic and thematic relations recognition performance.

IF 3.2 3区心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL

Psychonomic Bulletin & Review Pub Date : 2025-02-12 DOI:10.3758/s13423-025-02655-z

Kai Shi, Jiansheng Li

{"title":"Global precedence effects account for individual differences in taxonomic and thematic relations recognition performance.","authors":"Kai Shi, Jiansheng Li","doi":"10.3758/s13423-025-02655-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study examined whether individuals with higher levels of global precedence recognized thematic relations faster and exhibited a stronger preference for them. In Study 1, the Global-Local Precedence Index was calculated based on results from the Navon task to reflect the degree of individual global precedence. Preferences for thematic or taxonomic relations and recognition speed were measured using the forced-choice triad task and the similarity-matching task, respectively. The results showed that participants with a higher Global-Local Precedence Index had a higher proportion of thematic choices in the forced-choice triad task and identified thematically similar options faster in the similarity-matching task. In Study 2, we replaced the stimulus set of the forced-choice triad task with a larger and more diverse set of stimuli and replaced the similarity-matching task (a word-based task) with a semantic priming task (a picture-based task). The results still showed that participants with a higher Global-Local Precedence Index chose thematic options more frequently in the forced-choice triad task and responded faster to correctly judge whether the orientation of Gabor patches was the same or different after thematic priming. The findings indicate that individuals with higher global precedence recognize thematic relations faster and show a stronger preference for them.</p>","PeriodicalId":20763,"journal":{"name":"Psychonomic Bulletin & Review","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychonomic Bulletin & Review","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-025-02655-z","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study examined whether individuals with higher levels of global precedence recognized thematic relations faster and exhibited a stronger preference for them. In Study 1, the Global-Local Precedence Index was calculated based on results from the Navon task to reflect the degree of individual global precedence. Preferences for thematic or taxonomic relations and recognition speed were measured using the forced-choice triad task and the similarity-matching task, respectively. The results showed that participants with a higher Global-Local Precedence Index had a higher proportion of thematic choices in the forced-choice triad task and identified thematically similar options faster in the similarity-matching task. In Study 2, we replaced the stimulus set of the forced-choice triad task with a larger and more diverse set of stimuli and replaced the similarity-matching task (a word-based task) with a semantic priming task (a picture-based task). The results still showed that participants with a higher Global-Local Precedence Index chose thematic options more frequently in the forced-choice triad task and responded faster to correctly judge whether the orientation of Gabor patches was the same or different after thematic priming. The findings indicate that individuals with higher global precedence recognize thematic relations faster and show a stronger preference for them.

查看原文本刊更多论文

全局优先效应解释了分类和主题关系识别性能的个体差异。

本研究考察了整体优先度较高的个体是否能更快地识别主题关系并表现出更强的偏好。在研究1中，根据Navon任务的结果计算全局-局部优先指数，以反映单个全局优先的程度。对主题或分类关系的偏好和识别速度分别使用强迫选择三合一任务和相似性匹配任务进行测量。结果表明，全局-局部优先指数高的被试在强迫选择三合一任务中选择主题的比例更高，在相似匹配任务中识别主题相似选项的速度更快。在研究2中，我们用一个更大、更多样化的刺激集取代了强迫选择三合一任务的刺激集，并用语义启动任务（基于图片的任务）取代了相似性匹配任务（基于文字的任务）。结果表明，整体-局部优先指数高的被试在强迫选择三合一任务中选择主题选项的频率更高，在正确判断主题启动后Gabor斑块的方向是否相同或不同方面反应更快。结果表明，整体优先级高的个体对主题关系的识别速度更快，并表现出更强的偏好。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Psychonomic Bulletin & Review Multiple-

CiteScore

6.70

自引率

2.90%

发文量

165

期刊介绍： The journal provides coverage spanning a broad spectrum of topics in all areas of experimental psychology. The journal is primarily dedicated to the publication of theory and review articles and brief reports of outstanding experimental work. Areas of coverage include cognitive psychology broadly construed, including but not limited to action, perception, & attention, language, learning & memory, reasoning & decision making, and social cognition. We welcome submissions that approach these issues from a variety of perspectives such as behavioral measurements, comparative psychology, development, evolutionary psychology, genetics, neuroscience, and quantitative/computational modeling. We particularly encourage integrative research that crosses traditional content and methodological boundaries.