Opioid use among injured workers: pain and the return-to-work experience.

IF 3.9 2区 医学 Q1 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Victoria Nadalin, Nancy Carnide, Cameron Mustard, Colette N Severin, Andrea D Furlan, Peter M Smith
{"title":"Opioid use among injured workers: pain and the return-to-work experience.","authors":"Victoria Nadalin, Nancy Carnide, Cameron Mustard, Colette N Severin, Andrea D Furlan, Peter M Smith","doi":"10.1136/oemed-2024-109745","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>In this cross-sectional analysis, we explored how return-to-work (RTW) experiences and postinjury pain are associated with opioid use after a workplace injury/illness.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Workers with accepted lost-time claims, compensated by the workers' compensation board in Ontario, Canada were interviewed by telephone 18 months following a work-related physical injury/illness. Participants were asked about their past-year opioid use, current pain, RTW timing and workplace accommodations. Separate logistic regression analyses were conducted to estimate the association between two independent variables and opioid use: one combining the presence of pain with workplace accommodation and a second combining the presence of pain with RTW timing, adjusted for sociodemographic, work, injury and health covariates.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 1793 participants included in the analysis, 35.6% used opioids more than once in the past 12 months. Compared with those who did not return to work too soon and had no/mild pain, odds of opioid use were higher among those with severe pain, both those who returned too soon (OR 2.90, 95% CI 2.11 to 3.99) and those who did not return too soon (OR 3.01, 95% CI 2.16 to 4.19). Compared with those who had an offer of accommodation and no/mild pain, workers with severe pain and an accommodation offer (OR 2.78, 95% CI 2.16 to 3.57) or without an offer (OR 2.69, 95% CI 1.90 to 3.81) had increased odds of reporting use of opioids.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Findings suggest pain is the main factor associated with opioid use after a work-related injury, irrespective of RTW experiences. However, due to the limitations of this exploratory analysis, longitudinal research examining this issue is warranted.</p>","PeriodicalId":19459,"journal":{"name":"Occupational and Environmental Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"49-52"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Occupational and Environmental Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/oemed-2024-109745","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: In this cross-sectional analysis, we explored how return-to-work (RTW) experiences and postinjury pain are associated with opioid use after a workplace injury/illness.

Methods: Workers with accepted lost-time claims, compensated by the workers' compensation board in Ontario, Canada were interviewed by telephone 18 months following a work-related physical injury/illness. Participants were asked about their past-year opioid use, current pain, RTW timing and workplace accommodations. Separate logistic regression analyses were conducted to estimate the association between two independent variables and opioid use: one combining the presence of pain with workplace accommodation and a second combining the presence of pain with RTW timing, adjusted for sociodemographic, work, injury and health covariates.

Results: Of 1793 participants included in the analysis, 35.6% used opioids more than once in the past 12 months. Compared with those who did not return to work too soon and had no/mild pain, odds of opioid use were higher among those with severe pain, both those who returned too soon (OR 2.90, 95% CI 2.11 to 3.99) and those who did not return too soon (OR 3.01, 95% CI 2.16 to 4.19). Compared with those who had an offer of accommodation and no/mild pain, workers with severe pain and an accommodation offer (OR 2.78, 95% CI 2.16 to 3.57) or without an offer (OR 2.69, 95% CI 1.90 to 3.81) had increased odds of reporting use of opioids.

Conclusions: Findings suggest pain is the main factor associated with opioid use after a work-related injury, irrespective of RTW experiences. However, due to the limitations of this exploratory analysis, longitudinal research examining this issue is warranted.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Occupational and Environmental Medicine
Occupational and Environmental Medicine 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
8.30
自引率
2.00%
发文量
98
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: Occupational and Environmental Medicine is an international peer reviewed journal covering current developments in occupational and environmental health worldwide. Occupational and Environmental Medicine publishes high-quality research relating to the full range of chemical, physical, ergonomic, biological and psychosocial hazards in the workplace and to environmental contaminants and their health effects. The journal welcomes research aimed at improving the evidence-based practice of occupational and environmental research; including the development and application of novel biological and statistical techniques in addition to evaluation of interventions in controlling occupational and environmental risks.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信