Cognitive function in response to a pecan-enriched meal: a randomized, double-blind, cross-over study in healthy adults.

IF 3.6 4区 医学 Q2 NEUROSCIENCES
Alyssa J Guadagni, M Catherine Prater, Chad M Paton, Jamie A Cooper
{"title":"Cognitive function in response to a pecan-enriched meal: a randomized, double-blind, cross-over study in healthy adults.","authors":"Alyssa J Guadagni, M Catherine Prater, Chad M Paton, Jamie A Cooper","doi":"10.1080/1028415X.2025.2461018","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To examine cognitive responses to a pecan-enriched (68 g) meal or an isocaloric control meal in healthy adults.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Thirty-one adults completed a double-blind, randomized crossover trial with two testing visits: a pecan-enriched shake (PEC) (68 g pecans) or a high saturated fat shake as control (CON). A cognitive battery, visual analog scale for motivation, and the Stanford Sleepiness Scale were administered at fasting and 1, 2, 3, and 4 h postprandially.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Consumption of the PEC shake led to superior cognitive performance in Rapid Visual Information Processing percent correct and false alarms (<i>p </i>= 0.021 and <i>p </i>= 0.001), Choice Reaction Time percent correct (<i>p </i>= 0.005), Digit Vigilance false alarms (<i>p </i>= 0.036), Immediate Word Recall correct and error responses (<i>p </i>= 0.007 and <i>p </i>= 0.008), and Delayed Word Recall correct and error responses (<i>p </i>= 0.002 for both). Conversely, CON led to better performance in Word Recognition percent correct and correct reaction time measures (<i>p </i>= 0.017 and <i>p </i>= 0.005) and Numeric Working Memory percent correct measures (<i>p </i>= 0.034).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Consumption of a pecan-enriched meal enhanced cognitive performance compared to control. More than one-third (8/23) of the cognitive measures were favorable for pecan (4 in attention and processing speed, 4 in memory and learning), whereas only 3 were favorable for control (2 in memory and learning, 1 in executive function).<b>Trial registration</b>: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT05230212.</p>","PeriodicalId":19423,"journal":{"name":"Nutritional Neuroscience","volume":" ","pages":"1-18"},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nutritional Neuroscience","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/1028415X.2025.2461018","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To examine cognitive responses to a pecan-enriched (68 g) meal or an isocaloric control meal in healthy adults.

Methods: Thirty-one adults completed a double-blind, randomized crossover trial with two testing visits: a pecan-enriched shake (PEC) (68 g pecans) or a high saturated fat shake as control (CON). A cognitive battery, visual analog scale for motivation, and the Stanford Sleepiness Scale were administered at fasting and 1, 2, 3, and 4 h postprandially.

Results: Consumption of the PEC shake led to superior cognitive performance in Rapid Visual Information Processing percent correct and false alarms (p = 0.021 and p = 0.001), Choice Reaction Time percent correct (p = 0.005), Digit Vigilance false alarms (p = 0.036), Immediate Word Recall correct and error responses (p = 0.007 and p = 0.008), and Delayed Word Recall correct and error responses (p = 0.002 for both). Conversely, CON led to better performance in Word Recognition percent correct and correct reaction time measures (p = 0.017 and p = 0.005) and Numeric Working Memory percent correct measures (p = 0.034).

Conclusion: Consumption of a pecan-enriched meal enhanced cognitive performance compared to control. More than one-third (8/23) of the cognitive measures were favorable for pecan (4 in attention and processing speed, 4 in memory and learning), whereas only 3 were favorable for control (2 in memory and learning, 1 in executive function).Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT05230212.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Nutritional Neuroscience
Nutritional Neuroscience 医学-神经科学
CiteScore
8.50
自引率
2.80%
发文量
236
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Nutritional Neuroscience is an international, interdisciplinary broad-based, online journal for reporting both basic and clinical research in the field of nutrition that relates to the central and peripheral nervous system. Studies may include the role of different components of normal diet (protein, carbohydrate, fat, moderate use of alcohol, etc.), dietary supplements (minerals, vitamins, hormones, herbs, etc.), and food additives (artificial flavours, colours, sweeteners, etc.) on neurochemistry, neurobiology, and behavioural biology of all vertebrate and invertebrate organisms. Ideally this journal will serve as a forum for neuroscientists, nutritionists, neurologists, psychiatrists, and those interested in preventive medicine.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信