Parental knowledge, attitudes, satisfaction and decisional conflict regarding whole genome sequencing in the Genomic Medicine Service: a multisite survey study in England.

IF 3.5 2区 医学 Q2 GENETICS & HEREDITY
Ria Patel, Bettina Friedrich, Saskia C Sanderson, Holly Ellard, Celine Lewis
{"title":"Parental knowledge, attitudes, satisfaction and decisional conflict regarding whole genome sequencing in the Genomic Medicine Service: a multisite survey study in England.","authors":"Ria Patel, Bettina Friedrich, Saskia C Sanderson, Holly Ellard, Celine Lewis","doi":"10.1136/jmg-2024-110458","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Whole genome sequencing (WGS) for paediatric rare disease diagnosis is now available as a first-line test for certain clinical indications in the Genomic Medicine Service in England. The aim of this study was to assess decisional conflict regarding WGS at the time of consent as well as parental knowledge, attitudes and satisfaction.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a multisite quantitative survey including validated measures. Surveys were sent out across seven National Health Service Trusts in England to parents of children offered WGS, within 4 weeks of their appointment.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>374/1366 survey responses were included in the final dataset. Parents were highly satisfied with their WGS appointment (mean=24.47/28), had low decisional conflict (mean=20.09/100) and felt they had received enough information and support to make an informed decision (83.9%). Parents had positive attitudes towards WGS (mean=18.17/20), and those who had discussed WGS with a genetic counsellor or genomic associate had significantly more positive attitudes than those seen by genetic consultants (p<0.001). Most parents (84.3%) strongly agreed (27.2%) or agreed (67.1%) that they had a clear understanding of what a genomic test is. Parents whose child's condition was reported as more serious (p=0.0011) felt less conflicted about their decision.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The parents in this study had low decisional conflict and most felt they had made an informed decision. Further research after parents receive WGS results to assess whether any, and if so who, regrets their decision, is important.</p>","PeriodicalId":16237,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Medical Genetics","volume":" ","pages":"289-297"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Medical Genetics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/jmg-2024-110458","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GENETICS & HEREDITY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Whole genome sequencing (WGS) for paediatric rare disease diagnosis is now available as a first-line test for certain clinical indications in the Genomic Medicine Service in England. The aim of this study was to assess decisional conflict regarding WGS at the time of consent as well as parental knowledge, attitudes and satisfaction.

Methods: We conducted a multisite quantitative survey including validated measures. Surveys were sent out across seven National Health Service Trusts in England to parents of children offered WGS, within 4 weeks of their appointment.

Results: 374/1366 survey responses were included in the final dataset. Parents were highly satisfied with their WGS appointment (mean=24.47/28), had low decisional conflict (mean=20.09/100) and felt they had received enough information and support to make an informed decision (83.9%). Parents had positive attitudes towards WGS (mean=18.17/20), and those who had discussed WGS with a genetic counsellor or genomic associate had significantly more positive attitudes than those seen by genetic consultants (p<0.001). Most parents (84.3%) strongly agreed (27.2%) or agreed (67.1%) that they had a clear understanding of what a genomic test is. Parents whose child's condition was reported as more serious (p=0.0011) felt less conflicted about their decision.

Conclusions: The parents in this study had low decisional conflict and most felt they had made an informed decision. Further research after parents receive WGS results to assess whether any, and if so who, regrets their decision, is important.

在基因组医学服务中,父母对全基因组测序的知识、态度、满意度和决策冲突:英国的一项多地点调查研究。
背景:全基因组测序(WGS)用于儿科罕见病诊断,现已成为英国基因组医学服务中某些临床适应症的一线检测方法。本研究的目的是评估同意时关于WGS的决策冲突,以及父母的知识、态度和满意度。方法:我们进行了多地点的定量调查,包括有效的措施。调查在英格兰的七个国家卫生服务信托基金中向获得WGS的儿童的父母发送,在他们任命后的四周内。结果:374/1366份调查回复被纳入最终数据集。家长对他们的WGS任命非常满意(平均=24.47/28),决策冲突很少(平均=20.09/100),并且认为他们得到了足够的信息和支持来做出明智的决定(83.9%)。父母对WGS持积极态度(平均值=18.17/20),与遗传咨询师或基因组相关人员讨论过WGS的父母的态度明显比遗传咨询师更积极(结论:本研究中父母的决策冲突较低,大多数父母认为他们做出了明智的决定。在父母收到WGS的结果后,进一步的研究来评估是否有任何,如果有的话,谁后悔他们的决定是重要的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Medical Genetics
Journal of Medical Genetics 医学-遗传学
CiteScore
7.60
自引率
2.50%
发文量
92
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Medical Genetics is a leading international peer-reviewed journal covering original research in human genetics, including reviews of and opinion on the latest developments. Articles cover the molecular basis of human disease including germline cancer genetics, clinical manifestations of genetic disorders, applications of molecular genetics to medical practice and the systematic evaluation of such applications worldwide.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信