The dose-response relationship and gender differences of serum uric acid with total cholesterol: a cross-sectional study.

IF 1.4 4区 医学 Q4 MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL
Leilei Guo, Lina Cai, Li Hu, Yueshan Zhou
{"title":"The dose-response relationship and gender differences of serum uric acid with total cholesterol: a cross-sectional study.","authors":"Leilei Guo, Lina Cai, Li Hu, Yueshan Zhou","doi":"10.1177/03000605251318203","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To explore the dose-response relationship and gender differences between serum uric acid (SUA) and total cholesterol (TC) in Chinese individuals.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This cross-sectional study included secondary data of Chinese adults, collected between 2010 and 2018. The exposure variable was SUA, the outcome variable was TC, and participants were split into five quantiles by SUA levels (Q1 [men, ≤283; women, ≤223] to Q5 [men, ≥416; women, ≥332]). Covariates included age, gender, laboratory and examination information. Multivariable linear regression and subgroup analysis were performed to examine the independent association between SUA and TC. Smooth curve fitting and threshold effect analysis was employed to assess potential non-linear relationships. Additionally, a sensitivity analysis was conducted to validate the robustness of the findings.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The analysis included 6119 participants, of whom, 4078 (66.6%) were female, with a mean age of 63.7 years. After adjusting for potential confounders, SUA showed a significant association with TC in both men (β = 0.09; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.05, 0.14) and women (β = 0.13; 95% CI 0.10, 0.17). The Q5 group exhibited higher TC levels than the Q1 group in both men (β = 0.26; 95% CI 0.16, 0.37) and women (β = 0.25, 95% CI 0.17, 0.32). In women, there was an inverted L-shaped relationship between SUA and TC with an inflection point at 359.962 μmol/L, whereas a linear relationship was exhibited in men. Subgroup analysis showed no significant interactions in men. Sensitivity analyses confirmed the robustness of the findings.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Significant sex differences and dose-response relationships exist between SUA and TC in the Chinese population. The study may provide new insights into cholesterol management.</p>","PeriodicalId":16129,"journal":{"name":"Journal of International Medical Research","volume":"53 2","pages":"3000605251318203"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of International Medical Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/03000605251318203","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To explore the dose-response relationship and gender differences between serum uric acid (SUA) and total cholesterol (TC) in Chinese individuals.

Methods: This cross-sectional study included secondary data of Chinese adults, collected between 2010 and 2018. The exposure variable was SUA, the outcome variable was TC, and participants were split into five quantiles by SUA levels (Q1 [men, ≤283; women, ≤223] to Q5 [men, ≥416; women, ≥332]). Covariates included age, gender, laboratory and examination information. Multivariable linear regression and subgroup analysis were performed to examine the independent association between SUA and TC. Smooth curve fitting and threshold effect analysis was employed to assess potential non-linear relationships. Additionally, a sensitivity analysis was conducted to validate the robustness of the findings.

Results: The analysis included 6119 participants, of whom, 4078 (66.6%) were female, with a mean age of 63.7 years. After adjusting for potential confounders, SUA showed a significant association with TC in both men (β = 0.09; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.05, 0.14) and women (β = 0.13; 95% CI 0.10, 0.17). The Q5 group exhibited higher TC levels than the Q1 group in both men (β = 0.26; 95% CI 0.16, 0.37) and women (β = 0.25, 95% CI 0.17, 0.32). In women, there was an inverted L-shaped relationship between SUA and TC with an inflection point at 359.962 μmol/L, whereas a linear relationship was exhibited in men. Subgroup analysis showed no significant interactions in men. Sensitivity analyses confirmed the robustness of the findings.

Conclusions: Significant sex differences and dose-response relationships exist between SUA and TC in the Chinese population. The study may provide new insights into cholesterol management.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
555
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: _Journal of International Medical Research_ is a leading international journal for rapid publication of original medical, pre-clinical and clinical research, reviews, preliminary and pilot studies on a page charge basis. As a service to authors, every article accepted by peer review will be given a full technical edit to make papers as accessible and readable to the international medical community as rapidly as possible. Once the technical edit queries have been answered to the satisfaction of the journal, the paper will be published and made available freely to everyone under a creative commons licence. Symposium proceedings, summaries of presentations or collections of medical, pre-clinical or clinical data on a specific topic are welcome for publication as supplements. Print ISSN: 0300-0605
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信