Association among prosthodontic treatment, dietary diversity, and ingestible food profile in older outpatients with missing teeth.

IF 3.2 2区 医学 Q1 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE
Kazuki Sakamoto, Aya Kimura-Ono, Yoko Kurosaki, Takuya Mino, Shinsuke Nakagawa, Yuji Shimomura, Kou Omori, Takaharu Higuchi, Eri Koyama, Kumiko Nawachi, Kana Tokumoto, Yuji Tsuchiyama, Tokihiro Fukutoku, Mitsuaki Ono, Takuo Kuboki
{"title":"Association among prosthodontic treatment, dietary diversity, and ingestible food profile in older outpatients with missing teeth.","authors":"Kazuki Sakamoto, Aya Kimura-Ono, Yoko Kurosaki, Takuya Mino, Shinsuke Nakagawa, Yuji Shimomura, Kou Omori, Takaharu Higuchi, Eri Koyama, Kumiko Nawachi, Kana Tokumoto, Yuji Tsuchiyama, Tokihiro Fukutoku, Mitsuaki Ono, Takuo Kuboki","doi":"10.2186/jpr.JPR_D_24_00150","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>In this cross-sectional study, we aimed to investigate the association among dietary diversity, ingestible food profiles, and the type of prosthodontic treatment (i.e., removable partial or complete dentures [RD] vs. implant-supported dentures [ID], including implant-supported fixed prostheses and implant-assisted overdentures) in older Japanese outpatients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We included 297 patients aged ≥65 years (mean age, 75.3 years) undergoing maintenance therapy for RD or ID. Dietary diversity was assessed using the Dietary Variety Score (DVS) questionnaire. The ingestible food profile, a subjective quantification of the ability to consume foods with high masticatory difficulty, was evaluated using a validated ingestible food questionnaire and assessed using the ingestible food score (IFS). DVS- and IFS-related factors were identified using multiple regression analyses.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The median IFS of the ID group (100.0) was significantly higher than that of the RD group (84.5); however, the median DVS showed no statistically significant difference between the two groups. After adjusting for confounding factors, prosthodontic treatment type (RD) and the number of present teeth (≤20) were found to be significantly associated with low IFS, whereas young age and presence of cardiovascular disease were significantly associated with low DVS.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Older individuals with ID had a better ingestible food profile than those with RD; however, dietary diversity did not differ significantly between the two groups. RD is a potential risk factor for poor ingestible food profile, whereas the prosthodontic treatment type is not a direct risk factor for low dietary diversity.</p>","PeriodicalId":16887,"journal":{"name":"Journal of prosthodontic research","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of prosthodontic research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2186/jpr.JPR_D_24_00150","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: In this cross-sectional study, we aimed to investigate the association among dietary diversity, ingestible food profiles, and the type of prosthodontic treatment (i.e., removable partial or complete dentures [RD] vs. implant-supported dentures [ID], including implant-supported fixed prostheses and implant-assisted overdentures) in older Japanese outpatients.

Methods: We included 297 patients aged ≥65 years (mean age, 75.3 years) undergoing maintenance therapy for RD or ID. Dietary diversity was assessed using the Dietary Variety Score (DVS) questionnaire. The ingestible food profile, a subjective quantification of the ability to consume foods with high masticatory difficulty, was evaluated using a validated ingestible food questionnaire and assessed using the ingestible food score (IFS). DVS- and IFS-related factors were identified using multiple regression analyses.

Results: The median IFS of the ID group (100.0) was significantly higher than that of the RD group (84.5); however, the median DVS showed no statistically significant difference between the two groups. After adjusting for confounding factors, prosthodontic treatment type (RD) and the number of present teeth (≤20) were found to be significantly associated with low IFS, whereas young age and presence of cardiovascular disease were significantly associated with low DVS.

Conclusions: Older individuals with ID had a better ingestible food profile than those with RD; however, dietary diversity did not differ significantly between the two groups. RD is a potential risk factor for poor ingestible food profile, whereas the prosthodontic treatment type is not a direct risk factor for low dietary diversity.

老年缺牙门诊患者的修复治疗、饮食多样性和可消化食物特征之间的关系。
目的:在这项横断面研究中,我们旨在调查日本老年门诊患者饮食多样性、可摄取食物特征和修复治疗类型(即可摘局部或全口义齿[RD]与种植支持义齿[ID],包括种植支持固定义齿和种植辅助覆盖义齿)之间的关系。方法:我们纳入了297例年龄≥65岁(平均年龄75.3岁)接受RD或ID维持治疗的患者。采用膳食多样性评分(DVS)问卷对饲粮多样性进行评估。可食用食物概况是对食用具有高咀嚼困难的食物的能力的主观量化,使用经过验证的可食用食物问卷进行评估,并使用可食用食物评分(IFS)进行评估。使用多元回归分析确定DVS和ifs相关因素。结果:ID组的中位IFS(100.0)显著高于RD组(84.5);然而,中位DVS在两组间无统计学差异。在调整混杂因素后,发现修复治疗类型(RD)和现有牙齿数量(≤20颗)与低IFS显著相关,而年轻和是否存在心血管疾病与低DVS显著相关。结论:老年ID患者的可摄取食物状况优于RD患者;然而,饮食多样性在两组之间没有显著差异。RD是不良可消化食物的潜在危险因素,而修复治疗类型并不是低饮食多样性的直接危险因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of prosthodontic research
Journal of prosthodontic research DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE-
CiteScore
6.90
自引率
11.10%
发文量
161
期刊介绍: Journal of Prosthodontic Research is published 4 times annually, in January, April, July, and October, under supervision by the Editorial Board of Japan Prosthodontic Society, which selects all materials submitted for publication. Journal of Prosthodontic Research originated as an official journal of Japan Prosthodontic Society. It has recently developed a long-range plan to become the most prestigious Asian journal of dental research regarding all aspects of oral and occlusal rehabilitation, fixed/removable prosthodontics, oral implantology and applied oral biology and physiology. The Journal will cover all diagnostic and clinical management aspects necessary to reestablish subjective and objective harmonious oral aesthetics and function. The most-targeted topics: 1) Clinical Epidemiology and Prosthodontics 2) Fixed/Removable Prosthodontics 3) Oral Implantology 4) Prosthodontics-Related Biosciences (Regenerative Medicine, Bone Biology, Mechanobiology, Microbiology/Immunology) 5) Oral Physiology and Biomechanics (Masticating and Swallowing Function, Parafunction, e.g., bruxism) 6) Orofacial Pain and Temporomandibular Disorders (TMDs) 7) Adhesive Dentistry / Dental Materials / Aesthetic Dentistry 8) Maxillofacial Prosthodontics and Dysphagia Rehabilitation 9) Digital Dentistry Prosthodontic treatment may become necessary as a result of developmental or acquired disturbances in the orofacial region, of orofacial trauma, or of a variety of dental and oral diseases and orofacial pain conditions. Reviews, Original articles, technical procedure and case reports can be submitted. Letters to the Editor commenting on papers or any aspect of Journal of Prosthodontic Research are welcomed.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信