Collagenase clostridium histolyticum for Dupuytren's disease: a comprehensive systematic review and comparative analysis against percutaneous needle aponeurotomy and limited fasciectomy.

IF 1 4区 医学 Q3 ORTHOPEDICS
Jevan Cevik, Rohan Rajaram, Michaela Pollock, Ishith Seth, Warren M Rozen
{"title":"Collagenase clostridium histolyticum for Dupuytren's disease: a comprehensive systematic review and comparative analysis against percutaneous needle aponeurotomy and limited fasciectomy.","authors":"Jevan Cevik, Rohan Rajaram, Michaela Pollock, Ishith Seth, Warren M Rozen","doi":"10.2340/jphs.v60.42750","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This systematic review compared the efficacy of collagenase clostridium histolyticum (CCH) against percutaneous needle aponeurotomy (PNA) and limited fasciectomy (LF) for Dupuytren's contracture. Searches were conducted in PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science databases to March 2024. Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) were included. Primary outcomes included successful contracture correction as defined by included studies. Secondary outcomes included recurrence rates, patient-reported outcomes, and adverse events. A total of 11 studies (969 patients) were included. Meta-analysis showed no difference in efficacy between CCH and PNA (Relative Risk [RR]: 1.01, 95% Confidence Interval [CI]: 0.93-1.09). Recurrence rates were also similar (RR: 1.18, 95% CI: 0.95-1.48). Data suggested higher recurrence risk with CCH versus LF (RR: 6.84, 95% CI: 1.59-29.48). In some studies, CCH was associated with higher rates of haematoma, local pain, and oedema. CCH demonstrates comparable efficacy to PNA; however, it may have a higher risk of local complications and recurrence compared to LF. Treatment decisions should be made on a case-by-case basis.</p>","PeriodicalId":16847,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Plastic Surgery and Hand Surgery","volume":"60 ","pages":"27-34"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Plastic Surgery and Hand Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2340/jphs.v60.42750","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This systematic review compared the efficacy of collagenase clostridium histolyticum (CCH) against percutaneous needle aponeurotomy (PNA) and limited fasciectomy (LF) for Dupuytren's contracture. Searches were conducted in PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science databases to March 2024. Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) were included. Primary outcomes included successful contracture correction as defined by included studies. Secondary outcomes included recurrence rates, patient-reported outcomes, and adverse events. A total of 11 studies (969 patients) were included. Meta-analysis showed no difference in efficacy between CCH and PNA (Relative Risk [RR]: 1.01, 95% Confidence Interval [CI]: 0.93-1.09). Recurrence rates were also similar (RR: 1.18, 95% CI: 0.95-1.48). Data suggested higher recurrence risk with CCH versus LF (RR: 6.84, 95% CI: 1.59-29.48). In some studies, CCH was associated with higher rates of haematoma, local pain, and oedema. CCH demonstrates comparable efficacy to PNA; however, it may have a higher risk of local complications and recurrence compared to LF. Treatment decisions should be made on a case-by-case basis.

胶原酶溶组织梭菌治疗Dupuytren病:一项全面的系统综述和经皮针刺肌腱神经切开术和有限筋膜切除术的比较分析。
本系统综述比较了胶原酶溶组织梭菌(CCH)对经皮针刺肌腱神经切开术(PNA)和有限筋膜切除术(LF)治疗Dupuytren挛缩的疗效。检索在PubMed, Embase和Web of Science数据库中进行,直到2024年3月。纳入随机对照试验(RCTs)。主要结果包括纳入研究定义的成功挛缩矫正。次要结局包括复发率、患者报告的结局和不良事件。共纳入11项研究(969例患者)。meta分析显示CCH和PNA的疗效无差异(相对危险度[RR]: 1.01, 95%可信区间[CI]: 0.93-1.09)。复发率也相似(RR: 1.18, 95% CI: 0.95-1.48)。数据显示,CCH的复发风险高于LF (RR: 6.84, 95% CI: 1.59-29.48)。在一些研究中,CCH与血肿、局部疼痛和水肿的发生率较高有关。CCH的疗效与PNA相当;然而,与LF相比,它可能有更高的局部并发症和复发风险。治疗决定应根据具体情况而定。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
108
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The purpose of the Journal of Plastic Surgery and Hand Surgery is to serve as an international forum for plastic surgery, hand surgery and related research. Interest is focused on original articles on basic research and clinical evaluation. The scope of the journal comprises: • Articles concerning operative methods and follow-up studies • Research articles on subjects related to plastic and hand surgery • Articles on cranio-maxillofacial surgery, including cleft lip and palate surgery. Extended issues are published occasionally, dealing with special topics such as microvascular surgery, craniofacial surgery, or burns. Supplements, usually doctoral theses, may also be published. The journal is published for the Acta Chirurgica Scandinavica society and sponsored by the Key Foundation, Sweden. The journal was previously published as Scandinavian Journal of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery and Hand Surgery.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信