Where is the hard-to-reach population? Spatial analysis from a cross-sectional study on the access to bed net and malaria vaccine in the Lake Victoria Region, Kenya.

IF 2.4 3区 医学 Q3 INFECTIOUS DISEASES
Yura K Ko, Wataru Kagaya, Daisuke Yoneoka, James Kongere, Victor Opiyo, Jared Oginga, Protus Omondi, Kelvin B Musyoka, Chim W Chan, Bernard N Kanoi, Jesse Gitaka, Akira Kaneko
{"title":"Where is the hard-to-reach population? Spatial analysis from a cross-sectional study on the access to bed net and malaria vaccine in the Lake Victoria Region, Kenya.","authors":"Yura K Ko, Wataru Kagaya, Daisuke Yoneoka, James Kongere, Victor Opiyo, Jared Oginga, Protus Omondi, Kelvin B Musyoka, Chim W Chan, Bernard N Kanoi, Jesse Gitaka, Akira Kaneko","doi":"10.1186/s12936-025-05280-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Long-lasting insecticidal nets (LLIN) and vaccines are effective malaria control tools. However, inadequate uptake has been reported in countries where both interventions are available. To maximize the impact these tools provide, it is crucial to identify populations that are not being reached and the barriers to uptake.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In a cross-sectional study conducted in April 2024 in Kanyamwa Kologi Ward in Homa Bay County, Kenya, 4,662 households in 58 randomely selected villages were visited and interviewed. The proportions of households that (1) received at least one new LLIN within the previous five months (net distribution), (2) reported all children used LLIN (net usage), (3) reported at least one child had received one dose of the RTS,S vaccine (vaccine uptake), and (4) reported all children had received four doses of the vaccine (vaccine completion) were examined. Bayesian spatial autoregression analyses were used to estimate adjusted odds ratio (aOR) and its credible intervals (CrI) to identify the association between the household-level characteristics and the four outcomes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The overall uptake proportions were 89.9% for net distribution, 84.4% for net usage, 88.2% for vaccine uptake, and 53.7% for vaccine completion. All four outcomes showed geographical heterogeneity with significant (p < 0.05) Moran's I. Households headed by adults of > 40 years had higher odds of having received a new LLIN (aOR = 2.02, 95% CrI 1.02-5.42), having one child who had received one vaccine dose (aOR = 1.83, 0.69-4.66), and having all children fully vaccinated (aOR = 2.36, 1.09-5.46), but lower odds of net usage by all children (aOR = 0.62, 0.40-0.96). Households with five or more children had higher odds of having received a new LLIN (aOR = 5.36, 2.24-27.0) but lower odds of net usage by all children (aOR = 0.24, 0.14-0.38) and having all children fully vaccinated (aOR = 0.20, 0.04-0.61). Distance to the nearest health centre was negatively associated with all outcomes. Household wealth was positively associated with all outcomes.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Uptake of LLIN and malaria vaccine in Homa Bay County, Kenya varied by geography and household characteristics. These findings suggest that different sets of actions should be considered to improve the coverage and compliance of these interventions in different areas.</p>","PeriodicalId":18317,"journal":{"name":"Malaria Journal","volume":"24 1","pages":"42"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11823133/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Malaria Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12936-025-05280-2","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"INFECTIOUS DISEASES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Long-lasting insecticidal nets (LLIN) and vaccines are effective malaria control tools. However, inadequate uptake has been reported in countries where both interventions are available. To maximize the impact these tools provide, it is crucial to identify populations that are not being reached and the barriers to uptake.

Methods: In a cross-sectional study conducted in April 2024 in Kanyamwa Kologi Ward in Homa Bay County, Kenya, 4,662 households in 58 randomely selected villages were visited and interviewed. The proportions of households that (1) received at least one new LLIN within the previous five months (net distribution), (2) reported all children used LLIN (net usage), (3) reported at least one child had received one dose of the RTS,S vaccine (vaccine uptake), and (4) reported all children had received four doses of the vaccine (vaccine completion) were examined. Bayesian spatial autoregression analyses were used to estimate adjusted odds ratio (aOR) and its credible intervals (CrI) to identify the association between the household-level characteristics and the four outcomes.

Results: The overall uptake proportions were 89.9% for net distribution, 84.4% for net usage, 88.2% for vaccine uptake, and 53.7% for vaccine completion. All four outcomes showed geographical heterogeneity with significant (p < 0.05) Moran's I. Households headed by adults of > 40 years had higher odds of having received a new LLIN (aOR = 2.02, 95% CrI 1.02-5.42), having one child who had received one vaccine dose (aOR = 1.83, 0.69-4.66), and having all children fully vaccinated (aOR = 2.36, 1.09-5.46), but lower odds of net usage by all children (aOR = 0.62, 0.40-0.96). Households with five or more children had higher odds of having received a new LLIN (aOR = 5.36, 2.24-27.0) but lower odds of net usage by all children (aOR = 0.24, 0.14-0.38) and having all children fully vaccinated (aOR = 0.20, 0.04-0.61). Distance to the nearest health centre was negatively associated with all outcomes. Household wealth was positively associated with all outcomes.

Conclusion: Uptake of LLIN and malaria vaccine in Homa Bay County, Kenya varied by geography and household characteristics. These findings suggest that different sets of actions should be considered to improve the coverage and compliance of these interventions in different areas.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Malaria Journal
Malaria Journal 医学-寄生虫学
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
23.30%
发文量
334
审稿时长
2-4 weeks
期刊介绍: Malaria Journal is aimed at the scientific community interested in malaria in its broadest sense. It is the only journal that publishes exclusively articles on malaria and, as such, it aims to bring together knowledge from the different specialities involved in this very broad discipline, from the bench to the bedside and to the field.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信