Characteristics and outcomes of patients with and without statin-associated muscle symptoms treated with bempedoic acid in the CLEAR Outcomes trial.

IF 3.6 3区 医学 Q2 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
Ulrich Laufs, A Michael Lincoff, Stephen J Nicholls, Na Li, LeAnne Bloedon, William J Sasiela, Heather A Powell, Peter M Herout, Paul D Thompson, Steven E Nissen
{"title":"Characteristics and outcomes of patients with and without statin-associated muscle symptoms treated with bempedoic acid in the CLEAR Outcomes trial.","authors":"Ulrich Laufs, A Michael Lincoff, Stephen J Nicholls, Na Li, LeAnne Bloedon, William J Sasiela, Heather A Powell, Peter M Herout, Paul D Thompson, Steven E Nissen","doi":"10.1016/j.jacl.2024.12.014","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Cholesterol Lowering via bEmpedoic Acid Regimen (CLEAR) outcomes, a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled cardiovascular outcomes trial, and the largest prospective database of patients with statin intolerance (SI), demonstrated that bempedoic acid reduces low-density lipoprotein cholesterol and cardiovascular risk in patients at high cardiovascular risk.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>Assess baseline differences in SI symptoms and whether these influenced the clinical course during CLEAR outcomes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Symptoms and impact of SI on daily living were recorded prior to randomization. This posthoc analysis grouped patients as reporting statin-associated muscle symptoms only (SAMS), nonmuscle adverse effects only (nonSAMS), or BOTH.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 13,970 patients at baseline, 49% reported SAMS, 18% NonSAMS, and 33% BOTH. Moderate/severe impact on daily living was recorded for 62% SAMS, 48% NonSAMS, and 69% BOTH. Baseline lipid modifying treatment (LMT) was used in 43% SAMS, 36% nonSAMS, and 42% BOTH. Drop-in use of moderate/high-intensity statin at any time during the study was higher in the placebo group in all SI groups and higher in SAMS and BOTH vs. nonSAMS, but was not generally maintained at study end. SAMS and BOTH groups had more muscle symptoms and higher rates of treatment discontinuation vs. NonSAMS but there was no difference between treatments.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Patients who reported SAMS, regardless of randomization to bempedoic acid or placebo, had higher rates of discontinuation, higher rates of skeletal muscle symptoms, and a greater percentage of patients to attempt statin rechallenge. These findings indicate patients with history of SAMS may have background factors impacting their tolerance to LMT and may require more focused clinical management.</p><p><strong>Clinicaltrials: </strong></p><p><strong>Gov identifier: </strong>NCT02993406.</p>","PeriodicalId":15392,"journal":{"name":"Journal of clinical lipidology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of clinical lipidology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacl.2024.12.014","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Cholesterol Lowering via bEmpedoic Acid Regimen (CLEAR) outcomes, a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled cardiovascular outcomes trial, and the largest prospective database of patients with statin intolerance (SI), demonstrated that bempedoic acid reduces low-density lipoprotein cholesterol and cardiovascular risk in patients at high cardiovascular risk.

Objective: Assess baseline differences in SI symptoms and whether these influenced the clinical course during CLEAR outcomes.

Methods: Symptoms and impact of SI on daily living were recorded prior to randomization. This posthoc analysis grouped patients as reporting statin-associated muscle symptoms only (SAMS), nonmuscle adverse effects only (nonSAMS), or BOTH.

Results: Of the 13,970 patients at baseline, 49% reported SAMS, 18% NonSAMS, and 33% BOTH. Moderate/severe impact on daily living was recorded for 62% SAMS, 48% NonSAMS, and 69% BOTH. Baseline lipid modifying treatment (LMT) was used in 43% SAMS, 36% nonSAMS, and 42% BOTH. Drop-in use of moderate/high-intensity statin at any time during the study was higher in the placebo group in all SI groups and higher in SAMS and BOTH vs. nonSAMS, but was not generally maintained at study end. SAMS and BOTH groups had more muscle symptoms and higher rates of treatment discontinuation vs. NonSAMS but there was no difference between treatments.

Conclusion: Patients who reported SAMS, regardless of randomization to bempedoic acid or placebo, had higher rates of discontinuation, higher rates of skeletal muscle symptoms, and a greater percentage of patients to attempt statin rechallenge. These findings indicate patients with history of SAMS may have background factors impacting their tolerance to LMT and may require more focused clinical management.

Clinicaltrials:

Gov identifier: NCT02993406.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.00
自引率
6.80%
发文量
209
审稿时长
49 days
期刊介绍: Because the scope of clinical lipidology is broad, the topics addressed by the Journal are equally diverse. Typical articles explore lipidology as it is practiced in the treatment setting, recent developments in pharmacological research, reports of treatment and trials, case studies, the impact of lifestyle modification, and similar academic material of interest to the practitioner. Sections of Journal of clinical lipidology will address pioneering studies and the clinicians who conduct them, case studies, ethical standards and conduct, professional guidance such as ATP and NCEP, editorial commentary, letters from readers, National Lipid Association (NLA) news and upcoming event information, as well as abstracts from the NLA annual scientific sessions and the scientific forums held by its chapters, when appropriate.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信