Assessing the appropriateness of antifungal prescribing: key results from the implementation of a novel audit tool in Australian hospitals.

IF 3.9 2区 医学 Q1 INFECTIOUS DISEASES
A Khanina, N Singh, R James, D C M Kong, M A Slavin, K A Thursky
{"title":"Assessing the appropriateness of antifungal prescribing: key results from the implementation of a novel audit tool in Australian hospitals.","authors":"A Khanina, N Singh, R James, D C M Kong, M A Slavin, K A Thursky","doi":"10.1093/jac/dkaf044","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To utilize the Antifungal National Antimicrobial Prescribing Survey (Antifungal NAPS), a novel tool utilizing international consensus metrics for antifungal stewardship, to assess the quality of systemic antifungal prescribing in Australian hospitals, in order to identify quality improvement targets.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Participating hospitals were directed to audit all systemic antifungals or focus on a specific antifungal drug or class. Data entry into the Antifungal NAPS online portal occurred between October 2022 and June 2023. The data collection tool comprised patient details, reasons precluding use of antifungals, prescription details (guideline compliance, appropriateness, and reasons for inappropriate prescribing) and patient outcomes. Descriptive statistics were used to analyse the data.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Eleven hospitals contributed data for 516 prescriptions for 438 patients. Of these, 77.1% of prescriptions were appropriate, with the highest appropriateness for prophylactic (189/222; 85.1%), followed by directed (105/130; 80.8%) and empirical therapy (104/164; 63.4%). Fluconazole was the most commonly prescribed agent, which had the lowest rate of appropriateness (132/209; 63.2%). The most common reasons for inappropriate prescribing were no antifungal required (35/105; 33.3%), incorrect dose or frequency (30/105; 28.6%) and incorrect duration (19/105; 18.1%). Compliance with guidelines was 73.6%.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study outlines the successful implementation of the Antifungal NAPS, a standardized electronic audit tool for the assessment of antifungal prescribing quality. Key areas for quality improvement identified were the overuse of empirical fluconazole for urinary tract and intra-abdominal infections, the importance of invasive fungal infection risk assessment to guide prophylaxis prescribing and greater infectious diseases and antifungal stewardship oversight of antifungal prescribing to guide optimal prescribing.</p>","PeriodicalId":14969,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/jac/dkaf044","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"INFECTIOUS DISEASES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: To utilize the Antifungal National Antimicrobial Prescribing Survey (Antifungal NAPS), a novel tool utilizing international consensus metrics for antifungal stewardship, to assess the quality of systemic antifungal prescribing in Australian hospitals, in order to identify quality improvement targets.

Methods: Participating hospitals were directed to audit all systemic antifungals or focus on a specific antifungal drug or class. Data entry into the Antifungal NAPS online portal occurred between October 2022 and June 2023. The data collection tool comprised patient details, reasons precluding use of antifungals, prescription details (guideline compliance, appropriateness, and reasons for inappropriate prescribing) and patient outcomes. Descriptive statistics were used to analyse the data.

Results: Eleven hospitals contributed data for 516 prescriptions for 438 patients. Of these, 77.1% of prescriptions were appropriate, with the highest appropriateness for prophylactic (189/222; 85.1%), followed by directed (105/130; 80.8%) and empirical therapy (104/164; 63.4%). Fluconazole was the most commonly prescribed agent, which had the lowest rate of appropriateness (132/209; 63.2%). The most common reasons for inappropriate prescribing were no antifungal required (35/105; 33.3%), incorrect dose or frequency (30/105; 28.6%) and incorrect duration (19/105; 18.1%). Compliance with guidelines was 73.6%.

Conclusions: This study outlines the successful implementation of the Antifungal NAPS, a standardized electronic audit tool for the assessment of antifungal prescribing quality. Key areas for quality improvement identified were the overuse of empirical fluconazole for urinary tract and intra-abdominal infections, the importance of invasive fungal infection risk assessment to guide prophylaxis prescribing and greater infectious diseases and antifungal stewardship oversight of antifungal prescribing to guide optimal prescribing.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
9.20
自引率
5.80%
发文量
423
审稿时长
2-4 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal publishes articles that further knowledge and advance the science and application of antimicrobial chemotherapy with antibiotics and antifungal, antiviral and antiprotozoal agents. The Journal publishes primarily in human medicine, and articles in veterinary medicine likely to have an impact on global health.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信