Prevalence and outcomes of mild stroke patients undergoing reperfusion therapy: A meta-analysis and SAFE recommendations for optimal management.

IF 2.6 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Journal of Central Nervous System Disease Pub Date : 2025-02-12 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1177/11795735251314881
Pathmesh Rajeswaran, Bella B Huasen, Peter Stanwell, Murray C Killingsworth, Sonu M M Bhaskar
{"title":"Prevalence and outcomes of mild stroke patients undergoing reperfusion therapy: A meta-analysis and SAFE recommendations for optimal management.","authors":"Pathmesh Rajeswaran, Bella B Huasen, Peter Stanwell, Murray C Killingsworth, Sonu M M Bhaskar","doi":"10.1177/11795735251314881","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Mild acute ischemic stroke (AIS), characterized by a National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) score of 5 or less, can lead to significant long-term disabilities. Reperfusion therapies like intravenous thrombolysis (IVT) and endovascular thrombectomy (EVT) are commonly used in AIS, but their efficacy and safety in mild stroke cases remain unclear.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This meta-analysis aims to clarify the prevalence of mild AIS and evaluate the outcomes of reperfusion therapy, specifically IVT and EVT, in terms of functional recovery, mortality, stroke recurrence, and adverse events such as symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage (sICH), intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH), and early neurological deterioration (END).</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>A meta-analysis was conducted following PRISMA guidelines to combine and assess the results of independent studies examining the use of reperfusion therapies in patients with mild AIS.</p><p><strong>Data sources and methods: </strong>A systematic search of PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane databases was performed. Studies assessing mild AIS prevalence and the outcomes of reperfusion therapy were included. Random effects modelling was applied to evaluate associations between reperfusion therapy and clinical outcomes at 90 days.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Fifty-six studies, including 474 778 patients, were analyzed. The pooled prevalence of mild stroke was 54% among all AIS cases, 29% in IVT-treated patients, and 9% in EVT-treated patients. Reperfusion therapy was associated with significantly increased odds of sICH (OR 2.92), ICH (OR 2.20), and END (OR 2.37). However, no significant association was found with excellent functional outcomes (OR 0.93), good functional outcomes (OR 0.91), mortality (OR 1.14), or stroke recurrence (OR 0.93) at 90 days. Variations were observed between different reperfusion subgroups.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Mild AIS is prevalent, and reperfusion therapy in these cases is linked to higher rates of adverse events without a clear benefit in functional outcomes or mortality. These findings support the need for selective reperfusion therapy in mild stroke patients. The proposed SAFE framework-Selective use of IVT, Assessment of individual factors, Focus on EVT for large vessel occlusion (LVO), and Establishment of region-specific guidelines-may help guide clinical decisions. Further research should refine patient selection criteria and explore adjunctive therapies.</p>","PeriodicalId":15218,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Central Nervous System Disease","volume":"17 ","pages":"11795735251314881"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11815822/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Central Nervous System Disease","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/11795735251314881","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Mild acute ischemic stroke (AIS), characterized by a National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) score of 5 or less, can lead to significant long-term disabilities. Reperfusion therapies like intravenous thrombolysis (IVT) and endovascular thrombectomy (EVT) are commonly used in AIS, but their efficacy and safety in mild stroke cases remain unclear.

Objectives: This meta-analysis aims to clarify the prevalence of mild AIS and evaluate the outcomes of reperfusion therapy, specifically IVT and EVT, in terms of functional recovery, mortality, stroke recurrence, and adverse events such as symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage (sICH), intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH), and early neurological deterioration (END).

Design: A meta-analysis was conducted following PRISMA guidelines to combine and assess the results of independent studies examining the use of reperfusion therapies in patients with mild AIS.

Data sources and methods: A systematic search of PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane databases was performed. Studies assessing mild AIS prevalence and the outcomes of reperfusion therapy were included. Random effects modelling was applied to evaluate associations between reperfusion therapy and clinical outcomes at 90 days.

Results: Fifty-six studies, including 474 778 patients, were analyzed. The pooled prevalence of mild stroke was 54% among all AIS cases, 29% in IVT-treated patients, and 9% in EVT-treated patients. Reperfusion therapy was associated with significantly increased odds of sICH (OR 2.92), ICH (OR 2.20), and END (OR 2.37). However, no significant association was found with excellent functional outcomes (OR 0.93), good functional outcomes (OR 0.91), mortality (OR 1.14), or stroke recurrence (OR 0.93) at 90 days. Variations were observed between different reperfusion subgroups.

Conclusion: Mild AIS is prevalent, and reperfusion therapy in these cases is linked to higher rates of adverse events without a clear benefit in functional outcomes or mortality. These findings support the need for selective reperfusion therapy in mild stroke patients. The proposed SAFE framework-Selective use of IVT, Assessment of individual factors, Focus on EVT for large vessel occlusion (LVO), and Establishment of region-specific guidelines-may help guide clinical decisions. Further research should refine patient selection criteria and explore adjunctive therapies.

接受再灌注治疗的轻度脑卒中患者的患病率和结局:一项荟萃分析和安全建议的最佳管理。
背景:轻度急性缺血性脑卒中(AIS)的特征是美国国立卫生研究院卒中量表(NIHSS)得分为5分或更低,可导致严重的长期残疾。静脉溶栓(IVT)和血管内取栓(EVT)等再灌注治疗在AIS中常用,但其在轻度脑卒中患者中的疗效和安全性尚不清楚。目的:本荟萃分析旨在阐明轻度AIS的患病率,并评估再灌注治疗(特别是IVT和EVT)在功能恢复、死亡率、卒中复发和不良事件(如症状性脑出血(sICH)、脑出血(ICH)和早期神经功能恶化(END)方面的结果。设计:根据PRISMA指南进行荟萃分析,结合和评估独立研究的结果,检查轻度AIS患者再灌注治疗的使用。数据来源和方法:系统检索PubMed、Embase和Cochrane数据库。评估轻度AIS患病率和再灌注治疗结果的研究被纳入。采用随机效应模型评估再灌注治疗与90天临床结果之间的关系。结果:共分析了56项研究,包括474 778例患者。轻度卒中的总患病率在所有AIS病例中为54%,在ivt治疗的患者中为29%,在evt治疗的患者中为9%。再灌注治疗与sICH (OR 2.92)、ICH (OR 2.20)和END (OR 2.37)的发生率显著增加相关。然而,在90天内,未发现与优秀功能结局(OR 0.93)、良好功能结局(OR 0.91)、死亡率(OR 1.14)或卒中复发(OR 0.93)有显著相关性。不同再灌注亚组间观察到差异。结论:轻度AIS是普遍存在的,在这些病例中再灌注治疗与较高的不良事件发生率相关,在功能结局或死亡率方面没有明显的益处。这些发现支持对轻度脑卒中患者进行选择性再灌注治疗的必要性。建议的SAFE框架-选择性使用IVT,评估个体因素,关注EVT治疗大血管闭塞(LVO),以及建立区域特异性指南-可能有助于指导临床决策。进一步的研究应完善患者选择标准并探索辅助治疗。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
39
审稿时长
8 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信