Psychosocial factors are associated with community mobility and participation in persons with dizziness.

IF 2.7 3区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Frontiers in Neurology Pub Date : 2025-01-29 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.3389/fneur.2025.1531204
Pamela M Dunlap, Jeffrey P Staab, Patrick J Sparto, Joseph M Furman, Susan L Whitney
{"title":"Psychosocial factors are associated with community mobility and participation in persons with dizziness.","authors":"Pamela M Dunlap, Jeffrey P Staab, Patrick J Sparto, Joseph M Furman, Susan L Whitney","doi":"10.3389/fneur.2025.1531204","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Among individuals with dizziness, there is an increased prevalence of psychosocial comorbidity compared to the general population. Increased psychosocial comorbidity among people with dizziness is associated with disability and poorer outcomes in vestibular rehabilitation. However, there is less knowledge regarding the association between psychosocial factors and mobility outcomes in people with dizziness. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to assess the association between psychosocial factors and future activity, participation, and community mobility among people with dizziness. The secondary aim of this study was to explore the constructs measured using patient-reported outcomes associated with psychosocial factors in this population.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>We conducted a prospective cohort study with an in-person baseline assessment and a follow-up assessment completed at 3-months via computerized questionnaires. We measured psychosocial factors at baseline using the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS), the Patient Health Questionnaire 4-item (PHQ-4), the Vestibular Activities Avoidance Instrument (VAAI), and the Dizziness Catastrophizing Scale (DCS). We measured community mobility and participation at baseline and 3-month follow-up using the Life Space Assessment (LSA) and Vestibular Activities and Participation Measure (VAP). To determine the associations between baseline anxiety and depression symptoms, fear avoidance, catastrophizing beliefs and mobility and disability measures, we used simple linear regression and repeated measures ANOVA. We used exploratory factor analysis to identify constructs measured using patient-reported outcomes of psychosocial factors.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were 100 participants who completed the baseline assessment [mean age (SD) = 49.2 (15.7) years; 73% female] and 68 participants completed the questionnaire at the 3-month follow-up. In bivariate analyses, baseline VAAI, HADS-A, HADS-D, PHQ-4 depression, and VAP were associated with LSA, and baseline VAAI, HADS-D, PHQ-4 depression, and LSA were associated with VAP at 3-month follow-up (all <i>p</i> < 0.05). In adjusted multivariate analyses, baseline VAP had a large effect (<i>F</i> = 11.65, <i>p</i> = 0.001, <i>η</i> <sup>2</sup> = 0.18) and HADS-D had a moderately large effect (<i>F</i> = 4.09, <i>p</i> = 0.048, <i>η</i> <sup>2</sup> = 0.07) on LSA score at 3-month follow-up. Baseline VAAI had a large effect (<i>F</i> = 23.35, <i>p</i> < 0.001, <i>η</i> <sup>2</sup> = 0.3) on VAP at 3-month follow-up. The exploratory factor analysis of the VAAI, HADS, PHQ-4, and DCS resulted in 4 factors measuring constructs of fear avoidance, anxiety, depression, and catastrophization.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>We found that baseline psychosocial factors were related to future measures of activity and participation as well as community mobility in people with dizziness. Specifically, baseline activity and participation levels and depressive symptoms were significantly associated with future community mobility and baseline fear avoidance beliefs were significantly associated with future activity and participation. Patient-reported outcome measures of psychosocial factors appear to measure unique constructs, which may indicate that a small number of different outcome measures may be needed to gather important prognostic information to manage individuals with dizziness well.</p>","PeriodicalId":12575,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Neurology","volume":"16 ","pages":"1531204"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11813757/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Neurology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2025.1531204","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Among individuals with dizziness, there is an increased prevalence of psychosocial comorbidity compared to the general population. Increased psychosocial comorbidity among people with dizziness is associated with disability and poorer outcomes in vestibular rehabilitation. However, there is less knowledge regarding the association between psychosocial factors and mobility outcomes in people with dizziness. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to assess the association between psychosocial factors and future activity, participation, and community mobility among people with dizziness. The secondary aim of this study was to explore the constructs measured using patient-reported outcomes associated with psychosocial factors in this population.

Materials and methods: We conducted a prospective cohort study with an in-person baseline assessment and a follow-up assessment completed at 3-months via computerized questionnaires. We measured psychosocial factors at baseline using the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS), the Patient Health Questionnaire 4-item (PHQ-4), the Vestibular Activities Avoidance Instrument (VAAI), and the Dizziness Catastrophizing Scale (DCS). We measured community mobility and participation at baseline and 3-month follow-up using the Life Space Assessment (LSA) and Vestibular Activities and Participation Measure (VAP). To determine the associations between baseline anxiety and depression symptoms, fear avoidance, catastrophizing beliefs and mobility and disability measures, we used simple linear regression and repeated measures ANOVA. We used exploratory factor analysis to identify constructs measured using patient-reported outcomes of psychosocial factors.

Results: There were 100 participants who completed the baseline assessment [mean age (SD) = 49.2 (15.7) years; 73% female] and 68 participants completed the questionnaire at the 3-month follow-up. In bivariate analyses, baseline VAAI, HADS-A, HADS-D, PHQ-4 depression, and VAP were associated with LSA, and baseline VAAI, HADS-D, PHQ-4 depression, and LSA were associated with VAP at 3-month follow-up (all p < 0.05). In adjusted multivariate analyses, baseline VAP had a large effect (F = 11.65, p = 0.001, η 2 = 0.18) and HADS-D had a moderately large effect (F = 4.09, p = 0.048, η 2 = 0.07) on LSA score at 3-month follow-up. Baseline VAAI had a large effect (F = 23.35, p < 0.001, η 2 = 0.3) on VAP at 3-month follow-up. The exploratory factor analysis of the VAAI, HADS, PHQ-4, and DCS resulted in 4 factors measuring constructs of fear avoidance, anxiety, depression, and catastrophization.

Discussion: We found that baseline psychosocial factors were related to future measures of activity and participation as well as community mobility in people with dizziness. Specifically, baseline activity and participation levels and depressive symptoms were significantly associated with future community mobility and baseline fear avoidance beliefs were significantly associated with future activity and participation. Patient-reported outcome measures of psychosocial factors appear to measure unique constructs, which may indicate that a small number of different outcome measures may be needed to gather important prognostic information to manage individuals with dizziness well.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Frontiers in Neurology
Frontiers in Neurology CLINICAL NEUROLOGYNEUROSCIENCES -NEUROSCIENCES
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
8.80%
发文量
2792
审稿时长
14 weeks
期刊介绍: The section Stroke aims to quickly and accurately publish important experimental, translational and clinical studies, and reviews that contribute to the knowledge of stroke, its causes, manifestations, diagnosis, and management.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信