Jaume Borrell-Vega, José Daniel Fernández Font, Miguel Linares, Graciela Martínez-Pallí, Alba Isabel-Roquero, Lluis Mont, Josep Brugada, Elena Arbelo, Marc Giménez-Milà
{"title":"Eighteen-year analysis of anaesthetic management in Brugada syndrome: The BRUGANAES study.","authors":"Jaume Borrell-Vega, José Daniel Fernández Font, Miguel Linares, Graciela Martínez-Pallí, Alba Isabel-Roquero, Lluis Mont, Josep Brugada, Elena Arbelo, Marc Giménez-Milà","doi":"10.1097/EJA.0000000000002146","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Brugada syndrome (BrS) is a genetic disorder that increases the risk of ventricular tachyarrhythmias and sudden cardiac death (SCD). Certain drugs (propofol, local anaesthetics), fever, bradycardia, increased vagal tone and electrolyte imbalances can trigger or worsen BrS arrhythmias.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate the incidence of malignant ventricular arrhythmias during the perioperative period in patients with BrS, hypothesising that common anaesthetic drugs may be safe to use during daily clinical practice.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>The BRUGANAES study was an observational, retrospective project including BrS patients who underwent various types of anaesthesia.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>BrS patients undergoing any type of anaesthesia intervention from 1 January 2006, to 31 December 2023, from a tertiary hospital in Barcelona.</p><p><strong>Main outcome measures: </strong>The primary outcome was the occurrence of malignant ventricular arrhythmias and/or SCD during and up to 30 days postanaesthesia. Secondary outcomes included adverse events during hospitalisation, 30-day readmission rates and 30-day mortality rates.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 652 BrS patients registered in the hospital, 111 patients and 189 procedures were analysed. General anaesthesia was administered in 51.3% of cases, sedation in 36% and regional/neuraxial anaesthesia exclusively in 12.7%. Overall, nonrecommended drugs (propofol, ketamine and local anaesthetics) were used in 129 (68.3%) procedures, either bolus and/or continuous infusion. Epidural blocks were performed in 34% of regional anaesthesia cases, mostly in obstetrics, and subarachnoid blocks in 31.8%. The primary outcome occurred in two patients intraoperatively (1% of procedures): one with bradycardia-induced ventricular fibrillation after a nonrecommended drug and one with transient ventricular tachycardia after a drug not listed as potentially harmful.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>To date, this is one of the largest cohorts describing the perioperative approach for BrS patients, including a wide range of anaesthesia procedures and drugs. Most of the patients undergoing anaesthesia for an interventional procedure received an anaesthetic drug classified as not recommended.</p>","PeriodicalId":11920,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Anaesthesiology","volume":" ","pages":"458-467"},"PeriodicalIF":4.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Anaesthesiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/EJA.0000000000002146","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/12 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Brugada syndrome (BrS) is a genetic disorder that increases the risk of ventricular tachyarrhythmias and sudden cardiac death (SCD). Certain drugs (propofol, local anaesthetics), fever, bradycardia, increased vagal tone and electrolyte imbalances can trigger or worsen BrS arrhythmias.
Objective: To evaluate the incidence of malignant ventricular arrhythmias during the perioperative period in patients with BrS, hypothesising that common anaesthetic drugs may be safe to use during daily clinical practice.
Design: The BRUGANAES study was an observational, retrospective project including BrS patients who underwent various types of anaesthesia.
Setting: BrS patients undergoing any type of anaesthesia intervention from 1 January 2006, to 31 December 2023, from a tertiary hospital in Barcelona.
Main outcome measures: The primary outcome was the occurrence of malignant ventricular arrhythmias and/or SCD during and up to 30 days postanaesthesia. Secondary outcomes included adverse events during hospitalisation, 30-day readmission rates and 30-day mortality rates.
Results: Among 652 BrS patients registered in the hospital, 111 patients and 189 procedures were analysed. General anaesthesia was administered in 51.3% of cases, sedation in 36% and regional/neuraxial anaesthesia exclusively in 12.7%. Overall, nonrecommended drugs (propofol, ketamine and local anaesthetics) were used in 129 (68.3%) procedures, either bolus and/or continuous infusion. Epidural blocks were performed in 34% of regional anaesthesia cases, mostly in obstetrics, and subarachnoid blocks in 31.8%. The primary outcome occurred in two patients intraoperatively (1% of procedures): one with bradycardia-induced ventricular fibrillation after a nonrecommended drug and one with transient ventricular tachycardia after a drug not listed as potentially harmful.
Conclusion: To date, this is one of the largest cohorts describing the perioperative approach for BrS patients, including a wide range of anaesthesia procedures and drugs. Most of the patients undergoing anaesthesia for an interventional procedure received an anaesthetic drug classified as not recommended.
期刊介绍:
The European Journal of Anaesthesiology (EJA) publishes original work of high scientific quality in the field of anaesthesiology, pain, emergency medicine and intensive care. Preference is given to experimental work or clinical observation in man, and to laboratory work of clinical relevance. The journal also publishes commissioned reviews by an authority, editorials, invited commentaries, special articles, pro and con debates, and short reports (correspondences, case reports, short reports of clinical studies).