Alice M Munari, Caterina B Monti, Camilla Viglio, Gianluca Folco, Francesco Rizzetto, Salvatore Zirpoli
{"title":"MRI of pediatric ovarian masses: validation of the O-RADS framework.","authors":"Alice M Munari, Caterina B Monti, Camilla Viglio, Gianluca Folco, Francesco Rizzetto, Salvatore Zirpoli","doi":"10.1007/s00330-025-11444-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The purpose of our study was to test the applicability and implications of using the O-RADS system, which is developed and validated on adults, to review MRI of ovarian masses among pediatric patients.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>We retrospectively reviewed consecutive MRI examinations from pediatric patients referred to imaging for suspected ovarian lesions, assessing them using the O-RADS framework. Malignancy frequencies among O-RADS classes were reviewed, and we appraised the potential for such approach to split patients into low (O-RADS 1, 2, and 3) and high risk (O-RADS 4 and 5). Multivariate analyses were conducted to review which clinical or imaging variables yielded a significant impact on malignancy, and a simplified reading framework was proposed accordingly.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>109 female patients were included, with a median age of 13 years (IQR 11-15 years), 7 (7%) presenting with malignant lesions. Malignancy proportions were 0% (95% confidence Interval (CI) 0-35%) for the O-RADS 1 class, 0% (95% CI 0 - 5%) for the O-RADS 2 class, 0% (95% CI 0-14%) for the O-RADS 3 class, 50 (95% CI 1 - 99%) for the O-RADS 4 class, and 75% (95% CI 41-93%) for the O-RADS 5 class. The presence of peritoneal thickening or nodules (p < 0.001), lesion composition (p < 0.001), and absence of intralesional fat (p = 0.051) were individual predictors of malignancy, and the simplified reading framework proposed with such variables identified 11 likely malignant cases, detecting all 7 malignant lesions.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The O-RADS system may be applied to MRI performed in the pediatric population for ovarian masses, and a simplified reading framework based on O-RADS could also prove useful in such a setting.</p><p><strong>Key points: </strong>Question The Ovarian-Adnexal Reporting and Data System (O-RADS) provides the risk of malignancy of ovarian masses among adults but has not been validated among pediatric patients. Findings Malignancy frequencies for O-RADS classes 1, 2, 3, and 4 were 0, 0, 50%, and 75%, indicating a good accuracy in lesion discrimination. Clinical relevance The Ovarian-Adnexal Reporting and Data System (O-RADS) can be effectively applied to MRI examinations in pediatric patients, enabling accurate classification of findings, with potential for score simplification in this age group.</p>","PeriodicalId":12076,"journal":{"name":"European Radiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Radiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-025-11444-0","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objective: The purpose of our study was to test the applicability and implications of using the O-RADS system, which is developed and validated on adults, to review MRI of ovarian masses among pediatric patients.
Materials and methods: We retrospectively reviewed consecutive MRI examinations from pediatric patients referred to imaging for suspected ovarian lesions, assessing them using the O-RADS framework. Malignancy frequencies among O-RADS classes were reviewed, and we appraised the potential for such approach to split patients into low (O-RADS 1, 2, and 3) and high risk (O-RADS 4 and 5). Multivariate analyses were conducted to review which clinical or imaging variables yielded a significant impact on malignancy, and a simplified reading framework was proposed accordingly.
Results: 109 female patients were included, with a median age of 13 years (IQR 11-15 years), 7 (7%) presenting with malignant lesions. Malignancy proportions were 0% (95% confidence Interval (CI) 0-35%) for the O-RADS 1 class, 0% (95% CI 0 - 5%) for the O-RADS 2 class, 0% (95% CI 0-14%) for the O-RADS 3 class, 50 (95% CI 1 - 99%) for the O-RADS 4 class, and 75% (95% CI 41-93%) for the O-RADS 5 class. The presence of peritoneal thickening or nodules (p < 0.001), lesion composition (p < 0.001), and absence of intralesional fat (p = 0.051) were individual predictors of malignancy, and the simplified reading framework proposed with such variables identified 11 likely malignant cases, detecting all 7 malignant lesions.
Conclusion: The O-RADS system may be applied to MRI performed in the pediatric population for ovarian masses, and a simplified reading framework based on O-RADS could also prove useful in such a setting.
Key points: Question The Ovarian-Adnexal Reporting and Data System (O-RADS) provides the risk of malignancy of ovarian masses among adults but has not been validated among pediatric patients. Findings Malignancy frequencies for O-RADS classes 1, 2, 3, and 4 were 0, 0, 50%, and 75%, indicating a good accuracy in lesion discrimination. Clinical relevance The Ovarian-Adnexal Reporting and Data System (O-RADS) can be effectively applied to MRI examinations in pediatric patients, enabling accurate classification of findings, with potential for score simplification in this age group.
期刊介绍:
European Radiology (ER) continuously updates scientific knowledge in radiology by publication of strong original articles and state-of-the-art reviews written by leading radiologists. A well balanced combination of review articles, original papers, short communications from European radiological congresses and information on society matters makes ER an indispensable source for current information in this field.
This is the Journal of the European Society of Radiology, and the official journal of a number of societies.
From 2004-2008 supplements to European Radiology were published under its companion, European Radiology Supplements, ISSN 1613-3749.