Hajime G Kurita-Oyamada, Kevin J Kroll, Lang Zhou, Marianne Kozuch, Samuel M Wallace, Jean-François Gaillard, Jean-Claude J Bonzongo, Nancy D Denslow
{"title":"Drinking water treatment residuals reduce toxicity to fish from metal-contaminated sediments.","authors":"Hajime G Kurita-Oyamada, Kevin J Kroll, Lang Zhou, Marianne Kozuch, Samuel M Wallace, Jean-François Gaillard, Jean-Claude J Bonzongo, Nancy D Denslow","doi":"10.1093/etojnl/vgae079","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Drinking water treatment residuals (DWTRs) produced as a result of the coagulation-flocculation process during water treatment are considered waste materials. Characterization of this material shows its ability to sequester metals and other anionic and cationic chemicals. Drinking water treatment residuals from two different drinking water treatment plants located in Wyoming and Oregon were evaluated for their ability to function as viable capping materials of metal-contaminated sediments. The contaminated sediments tested were either spiked with a mixture of metals, 1 mg/kg of Cu, Zn, Cd, and Pb, or coming from an intertidal sediment collected at a U.S. Naval Air Station. A Gust chamber experiment was used to determine metal fluxes from these sediments into the overlying water with applied hydrodynamic stress of 0.05 and 0.4 Pa in the absence and presence of DWTR as a capping material. The DWTR effectively reduced the amount of metal released to the overlying waters to a value below the National Recommended Aquatic Life Criteria for Cr, Cu, Pb, and Zn, but slightly above the value for Cd. The toxicity of these waters was tested with an in vivo 96 hr fathead minnow survival assay. In the absence of capping, all the fry died within 1 hr. Capping with DWTR from Wyoming effectively reduced contamination, and 95% of the fish survived. The DWTR from Oregon was less successful, but the survival of fish was equivalent to diluting the original contaminated waters by a factor of 100. Drinking water treatment residual effectively reduced metallothionein in fish, a biomarker of metal contamination, corroborating the survival experiments. These results suggest that DWTRs may be very effective for remediation of metal-contaminated sites.</p>","PeriodicalId":11793,"journal":{"name":"Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/etojnl/vgae079","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Drinking water treatment residuals (DWTRs) produced as a result of the coagulation-flocculation process during water treatment are considered waste materials. Characterization of this material shows its ability to sequester metals and other anionic and cationic chemicals. Drinking water treatment residuals from two different drinking water treatment plants located in Wyoming and Oregon were evaluated for their ability to function as viable capping materials of metal-contaminated sediments. The contaminated sediments tested were either spiked with a mixture of metals, 1 mg/kg of Cu, Zn, Cd, and Pb, or coming from an intertidal sediment collected at a U.S. Naval Air Station. A Gust chamber experiment was used to determine metal fluxes from these sediments into the overlying water with applied hydrodynamic stress of 0.05 and 0.4 Pa in the absence and presence of DWTR as a capping material. The DWTR effectively reduced the amount of metal released to the overlying waters to a value below the National Recommended Aquatic Life Criteria for Cr, Cu, Pb, and Zn, but slightly above the value for Cd. The toxicity of these waters was tested with an in vivo 96 hr fathead minnow survival assay. In the absence of capping, all the fry died within 1 hr. Capping with DWTR from Wyoming effectively reduced contamination, and 95% of the fish survived. The DWTR from Oregon was less successful, but the survival of fish was equivalent to diluting the original contaminated waters by a factor of 100. Drinking water treatment residual effectively reduced metallothionein in fish, a biomarker of metal contamination, corroborating the survival experiments. These results suggest that DWTRs may be very effective for remediation of metal-contaminated sites.
期刊介绍:
The Society of Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry (SETAC) publishes two journals: Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry (ET&C) and Integrated Environmental Assessment and Management (IEAM). Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry is dedicated to furthering scientific knowledge and disseminating information on environmental toxicology and chemistry, including the application of these sciences to risk assessment.[...]
Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry is interdisciplinary in scope and integrates the fields of environmental toxicology; environmental, analytical, and molecular chemistry; ecology; physiology; biochemistry; microbiology; genetics; genomics; environmental engineering; chemical, environmental, and biological modeling; epidemiology; and earth sciences. ET&C seeks to publish papers describing original experimental or theoretical work that significantly advances understanding in the area of environmental toxicology, environmental chemistry and hazard/risk assessment. Emphasis is given to papers that enhance capabilities for the prediction, measurement, and assessment of the fate and effects of chemicals in the environment, rather than simply providing additional data. The scientific impact of papers is judged in terms of the breadth and depth of the findings and the expected influence on existing or future scientific practice. Methodological papers must make clear not only how the work differs from existing practice, but the significance of these differences to the field. Site-based research or monitoring must have regional or global implications beyond the particular site, such as evaluating processes, mechanisms, or theory under a natural environmental setting.