Does capsule repair improve the clinical and radiological outcomes of the acute Rockwood type V acromioclavicular dislocations treated with the double endobutton technique?

IF 1.9 3区 医学 Q2 EMERGENCY MEDICINE
Mehmet Maden, Tayfun Bacaksiz, Ihsan Akan, Cemal Kazimoglu
{"title":"Does capsule repair improve the clinical and radiological outcomes of the acute Rockwood type V acromioclavicular dislocations treated with the double endobutton technique?","authors":"Mehmet Maden, Tayfun Bacaksiz, Ihsan Akan, Cemal Kazimoglu","doi":"10.1007/s00068-025-02786-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The objective of the present study is to examine how repairing the capsule affects the radiological and clinical results of treating acute Rockwood type V acromioclavicular joint dislocations using the endobutton method.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The study involved patients between the ages of 18 and 65 who had acute Rockwood type V acromioclavicular joint dislocation and were treated using the double endobutton technique, with or without capsule repair, from January 2021 to December 2023. Clinical and radiological assessment was conducted at various time points up to the last follow-up. Functional evaluation was conducted using the Disability of Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) scoring system, Constant-Murley Score (CMS), and Specific Acromioclavicular Score (SACS) at the final follow-up. Radiological evaluation involved the measurement of the coracoclavicular distance and evaluation of complications. Statistical analysis was performed using Mann-Whitney U and Pearson's Chi-Square and Fisher's Exact test.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In this study, a group of 23 patients were monitored over a period of approximately 20.91 ± 8.3 (12-36) months. Functional results were significantly different in favor of Group 2, when the groups were categorized from excellent to poor (p < 0.05). At the final radiograph, the mean coracoclavicular distance showed a statistically significant difference in favor of Group 2 (p = 0.039). Loss of reduction was statistically significantly seen more in Group 1 (p = 0.031). The total rate of complication was similarly in the two groups, showing no substantial variations.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The combination of the double endobutton method and capsule repair is a secure and dependable procedure that provides sufficient stability. This technique has provided favorable clinical and radiologic results in the treatment of acute Rockwood type V acromioclavicular dislocation.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>Level III, Retrospective comperative study.</p>","PeriodicalId":12064,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Trauma and Emergency Surgery","volume":"51 1","pages":"104"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Trauma and Emergency Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00068-025-02786-x","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EMERGENCY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: The objective of the present study is to examine how repairing the capsule affects the radiological and clinical results of treating acute Rockwood type V acromioclavicular joint dislocations using the endobutton method.

Methods: The study involved patients between the ages of 18 and 65 who had acute Rockwood type V acromioclavicular joint dislocation and were treated using the double endobutton technique, with or without capsule repair, from January 2021 to December 2023. Clinical and radiological assessment was conducted at various time points up to the last follow-up. Functional evaluation was conducted using the Disability of Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) scoring system, Constant-Murley Score (CMS), and Specific Acromioclavicular Score (SACS) at the final follow-up. Radiological evaluation involved the measurement of the coracoclavicular distance and evaluation of complications. Statistical analysis was performed using Mann-Whitney U and Pearson's Chi-Square and Fisher's Exact test.

Results: In this study, a group of 23 patients were monitored over a period of approximately 20.91 ± 8.3 (12-36) months. Functional results were significantly different in favor of Group 2, when the groups were categorized from excellent to poor (p < 0.05). At the final radiograph, the mean coracoclavicular distance showed a statistically significant difference in favor of Group 2 (p = 0.039). Loss of reduction was statistically significantly seen more in Group 1 (p = 0.031). The total rate of complication was similarly in the two groups, showing no substantial variations.

Conclusion: The combination of the double endobutton method and capsule repair is a secure and dependable procedure that provides sufficient stability. This technique has provided favorable clinical and radiologic results in the treatment of acute Rockwood type V acromioclavicular dislocation.

Level of evidence: Level III, Retrospective comperative study.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
14.30%
发文量
311
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: The European Journal of Trauma and Emergency Surgery aims to open an interdisciplinary forum that allows for the scientific exchange between basic and clinical science related to pathophysiology, diagnostics and treatment of traumatized patients. The journal covers all aspects of clinical management, operative treatment and related research of traumatic injuries. Clinical and experimental papers on issues relevant for the improvement of trauma care are published. Reviews, original articles, short communications and letters allow the appropriate presentation of major and minor topics.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信