Short-course antibiotic strategies for ventilator-associated pneumonia.

IF 3.6 3区 医学 Q2 INFECTIOUS DISEASES
Current Opinion in Infectious Diseases Pub Date : 2025-04-01 Epub Date: 2025-01-29 DOI:10.1097/QCO.0000000000001094
Wei Cong Tan, Joan Quah, Andrew Yunkai Li
{"title":"Short-course antibiotic strategies for ventilator-associated pneumonia.","authors":"Wei Cong Tan, Joan Quah, Andrew Yunkai Li","doi":"10.1097/QCO.0000000000001094","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose of review: </strong>Evidence behind antibiotic duration while treating ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) remains unclear. There is a need to balance minimizing the development of antimicrobial resistance without compromising clinical outcomes given the high mortality.</p><p><strong>Recent findings: </strong>Recent studies have suggested that shorter antibiotic courses, when individualized to clinical response, may be adequate for treating VAP without increasing the incidence of mortality or recurrence, regardless of pathogens. Moreover, shortening duration may reduce the risk of adverse events, including acute kidney injury.</p><p><strong>Summary: </strong>Shortening the duration of antibiotic treatment for VAP, in the setting of appropriate clinical response, is a reasonable strategy to reduce costs and selective pressure driving antimicrobial resistance. This was demonstrated in the latest REGARD-VAP study, even among VAP patients with nonfermenting Gram-negative bacilli or carbapenem-resistant pathogens. Given the challenges in diagnosing VAP, such pragmatic approaches would be essential as part of overall antibiotic stewardship programmes. Further refinement to the criteria for antibiotic cessation may be possible.</p>","PeriodicalId":10880,"journal":{"name":"Current Opinion in Infectious Diseases","volume":" ","pages":"182-189"},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Opinion in Infectious Diseases","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/QCO.0000000000001094","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/29 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"INFECTIOUS DISEASES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose of review: Evidence behind antibiotic duration while treating ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) remains unclear. There is a need to balance minimizing the development of antimicrobial resistance without compromising clinical outcomes given the high mortality.

Recent findings: Recent studies have suggested that shorter antibiotic courses, when individualized to clinical response, may be adequate for treating VAP without increasing the incidence of mortality or recurrence, regardless of pathogens. Moreover, shortening duration may reduce the risk of adverse events, including acute kidney injury.

Summary: Shortening the duration of antibiotic treatment for VAP, in the setting of appropriate clinical response, is a reasonable strategy to reduce costs and selective pressure driving antimicrobial resistance. This was demonstrated in the latest REGARD-VAP study, even among VAP patients with nonfermenting Gram-negative bacilli or carbapenem-resistant pathogens. Given the challenges in diagnosing VAP, such pragmatic approaches would be essential as part of overall antibiotic stewardship programmes. Further refinement to the criteria for antibiotic cessation may be possible.

呼吸机相关性肺炎的短期抗生素治疗策略。
综述的目的:在治疗呼吸机相关性肺炎(VAP)时抗生素持续时间的证据尚不清楚。鉴于高死亡率,有必要在不影响临床结果的情况下尽量减少抗菌素耐药性的发展。最近的发现:最近的研究表明,当个体化到临床反应时,较短的抗生素疗程可能足以治疗VAP,而不会增加死亡率或复发率,无论病原体如何。此外,缩短时间可以减少不良事件的风险,包括急性肾损伤。摘要:在适当的临床反应的情况下,缩短VAP的抗生素治疗时间是降低成本和选择性压力驱动抗菌药物耐药的合理策略。最新的REGARD-VAP研究证实了这一点,即使在非发酵革兰氏阴性杆菌或碳青霉烯耐药病原体的VAP患者中也是如此。考虑到在诊断VAP方面的挑战,这种务实的方法作为整体抗生素管理规划的一部分至关重要。可能会进一步完善停用抗生素的标准。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.70
自引率
2.60%
发文量
121
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: This reader-friendly, bimonthly resource provides a powerful, broad-based perspective on the most important advances from throughout the world literature. Featuring renowned guest editors and focusing exclusively on two topics, every issue of Current Opinion in Infectious Disease delivers unvarnished, expert assessments of developments from the previous year. Insightful editorials and on-the-mark invited reviews cover key subjects such as HIV infection and AIDS; skin and soft tissue infections; respiratory infections; paediatric and neonatal infections; gastrointestinal infections; tropical and travel-associated diseases; and antimicrobial agents.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信