Healthcare resource utilization with adjunctive cariprazine and other atypical antipsychotics in patients with major depressive disorder.

IF 2.2 4区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Current Medical Research and Opinion Pub Date : 2025-02-01 Epub Date: 2025-02-24 DOI:10.1080/03007995.2025.2465617
Anita H Clayton, Mousam Parikh, Tracy Yee, Daniel Mercer, Haiyan Sun, Nicholas Cummings, Andrew Rava, Oscar Hayes, Nadia Nabulsi
{"title":"Healthcare resource utilization with adjunctive cariprazine and other atypical antipsychotics in patients with major depressive disorder.","authors":"Anita H Clayton, Mousam Parikh, Tracy Yee, Daniel Mercer, Haiyan Sun, Nicholas Cummings, Andrew Rava, Oscar Hayes, Nadia Nabulsi","doi":"10.1080/03007995.2025.2465617","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Little is known about the healthcare resource utilization (HRU) associated with different adjunctive atypical antipsychotics (AAs) for the treatment of major depressive disorder (MDD). This analysis evaluated HRU in patients with MDD treated adjunctively with cariprazine versus other AAs.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Merative MarketScan databases were searched for claims made from 01/01/2018 to 12/31/2020 (Medicaid) or 3/31/2021 (commercial and Medicare). The study included adults with ≥1 inpatient MDD claim or ≥2 outpatient MDD claims >30 days apart and ≥1 claim for cariprazine, brexpiprazole, generic aripiprazole, or generic quetiapine adjunctive to an antidepressant (i.e. ≥14-day overlap between AA and antidepressant). Outcomes included all-cause and MDD-related inpatient stays and emergency department (ED), office, and psychiatric visits. Results were reported as estimated mean ratios, calculated <i>via</i> negative binomial regression, of the comparator AA to cariprazine with 95% CIs.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Analyses included 40,195 patients (cariprazine [<i>n</i> = 1,038], brexpiprazole [<i>n</i> = 3,221], generic aripiprazole [<i>n</i> = 20,601], generic quetiapine [<i>n</i> = 15,335]). The cariprazine cohort had significantly fewer all-cause and MDD-related inpatient stays relative to all other AA cohorts. All-cause ED visits were significantly lower in the cariprazine versus generic quetiapine cohort, and MDD-related ED visits were significantly lower in the cariprazine versus generic aripiprazole and generic quetiapine cohorts. ED visits were similar between cariprazine and all other cohorts. All-cause and MDD-related office and psychiatric visits were significantly lower in the cariprazine versus most other AA cohorts.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Although causality cannot be determined from these real-world findings, results suggest that in patients with MDD, initiating adjunctive cariprazine is associated with significantly lower HRU for certain outcomes relative to other AAs.</p>","PeriodicalId":10814,"journal":{"name":"Current Medical Research and Opinion","volume":" ","pages":"219-226"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Medical Research and Opinion","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/03007995.2025.2465617","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/24 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Little is known about the healthcare resource utilization (HRU) associated with different adjunctive atypical antipsychotics (AAs) for the treatment of major depressive disorder (MDD). This analysis evaluated HRU in patients with MDD treated adjunctively with cariprazine versus other AAs.

Methods: Merative MarketScan databases were searched for claims made from 01/01/2018 to 12/31/2020 (Medicaid) or 3/31/2021 (commercial and Medicare). The study included adults with ≥1 inpatient MDD claim or ≥2 outpatient MDD claims >30 days apart and ≥1 claim for cariprazine, brexpiprazole, generic aripiprazole, or generic quetiapine adjunctive to an antidepressant (i.e. ≥14-day overlap between AA and antidepressant). Outcomes included all-cause and MDD-related inpatient stays and emergency department (ED), office, and psychiatric visits. Results were reported as estimated mean ratios, calculated via negative binomial regression, of the comparator AA to cariprazine with 95% CIs.

Results: Analyses included 40,195 patients (cariprazine [n = 1,038], brexpiprazole [n = 3,221], generic aripiprazole [n = 20,601], generic quetiapine [n = 15,335]). The cariprazine cohort had significantly fewer all-cause and MDD-related inpatient stays relative to all other AA cohorts. All-cause ED visits were significantly lower in the cariprazine versus generic quetiapine cohort, and MDD-related ED visits were significantly lower in the cariprazine versus generic aripiprazole and generic quetiapine cohorts. ED visits were similar between cariprazine and all other cohorts. All-cause and MDD-related office and psychiatric visits were significantly lower in the cariprazine versus most other AA cohorts.

Conclusion: Although causality cannot be determined from these real-world findings, results suggest that in patients with MDD, initiating adjunctive cariprazine is associated with significantly lower HRU for certain outcomes relative to other AAs.

重性抑郁症患者辅助使用卡吡嗪和其他非典型抗精神病药物的医疗资源利用。
目的:了解不同辅助非典型抗精神病药物治疗重度抑郁症(MDD)的医疗资源利用率(HRU)。该分析评估了卡吡嗪辅助治疗MDD患者的HRU与其他抗抑郁药的比较。方法:在Merative MarketScan数据库中检索2018年1月1日至2020年12月31日(医疗补助)或2021年3月31日(商业和医疗保险)的索赔。该研究纳入了间隔30天有≥1次住院MDD索赔或≥2次门诊MDD索赔的成年人,并且有≥1次卡吡嗪、布雷克斯哌唑、仿制阿立哌唑或仿制喹硫平辅助抗抑郁药索赔(即AA和抗抑郁药之间重叠≥14天)。结果包括全因和mdd相关的住院时间、急诊科(ED)、办公室和精神科就诊。结果报告为通过负二项回归计算的比较剂AA与卡吡嗪的估计平均比值,ci为95%。结果:纳入40,195例患者(卡吡嗪[n = 1,038],布雷克斯哌唑[n = 3,221],仿制阿立哌唑[n = 20,601],仿制喹硫平[n = 15,335])。与所有其他AA组相比,卡吡嗪组的全因和mdd相关住院时间显著减少。与非专利喹硫平组相比,卡吡嗪组的全因ED就诊显著降低,卡吡嗪组与非专利阿立哌唑组和非专利喹硫平组的mdd相关ED就诊显著降低。卡吡嗪组和所有其他组的急诊科就诊情况相似。与大多数其他AA组相比,卡吡嗪组的全因和mdd相关的办公室和精神科就诊显著降低。结论:虽然因果关系不能从这些现实世界的发现中确定,但结果表明,在重度抑郁症患者中,相对于其他AAs,开始使用辅助卡吡嗪与某些结果的显着较低的HRU相关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Current Medical Research and Opinion
Current Medical Research and Opinion 医学-医学:内科
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
4.30%
发文量
247
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Current Medical Research and Opinion is a MEDLINE-indexed, peer-reviewed, international journal for the rapid publication of original research on new and existing drugs and therapies, Phase II-IV studies, and post-marketing investigations. Equivalence, safety and efficacy/effectiveness studies are especially encouraged. Preclinical, Phase I, pharmacoeconomic, outcomes and quality of life studies may also be considered if there is clear clinical relevance
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信