Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer: A Nationwide Analysis of Eligibility, Utilization, and Outcomes.

IF 4.5 2区 医学 Q1 ONCOLOGY
Cancers Pub Date : 2025-02-03 DOI:10.3390/cancers17030505
Ilkka Nikulainen, Antti P Salminen, Mikael Högerman, Heikki Seikkula, Peter J Boström, The Finnish National Cystectomy Database Research Group
{"title":"Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer: A Nationwide Analysis of Eligibility, Utilization, and Outcomes.","authors":"Ilkka Nikulainen, Antti P Salminen, Mikael Högerman, Heikki Seikkula, Peter J Boström, The Finnish National Cystectomy Database Research Group","doi":"10.3390/cancers17030505","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To investigate neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) eligibility, utilization, and survival outcomes for muscle-invasive bladder cancer patients undergoing radical cystectomy (RC) in a Finnish population.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Data from the Finnish National Cystectomy Database (2005-2017) was combined with Finnish Cancer Registry survival data. NAC utilization rates were reported, and downstaging rates were calculated based on final pathological staging. Logistic regression analyzed NAC usage and complete response (CR) predictors.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Since 2011, 29% of 1157 patients received NAC. Its usage remained consistent, and the number of eligible patients not receiving NAC decreased during the study period. Among NAC patients, pathology T-category was pT0 (34%), pT1-Ta-Tis (16%), pT2 (23%), pT3 (20%), and pT4 (7%) tumors, with pN0 in 82%. In the RC + NAC group, the 5-year overall survival (OS) rates were 89% for patients with no residual disease (pT0N0), 82% for those with organ-confined residual disease (pT1, Tis, Ta, T2/N0), and 49% for patients with non-organ-confined residual disease (pT3+/N+). The corresponding cancer-specific survival (CSS) rates were 93%, 86%, and 57%, respectively. Patients with organ-confined residual disease after NAC had survival outcomes comparable to those who underwent RC alone. Higher age; odds ratio (OR) 0.93, [95% Confidence Interval (CI): 0.90-0.95] and Charlson Co-morbidity Index-score [OR 0.88 (0.79-0.98)] reduced the likelihood of receiving NAC, while a smaller center size increased the probability [OR 1.82 (1.02-3.28)]. More treatment cycles [OR 0.70, (95% CI: 0.51-0.93)] and a favorable GFR [OR 0.38 (0.16-0.88)] were associated with achieving CR.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>We report that NAC is well-utilized across Finland, with CR rates comparable to recent trials. Additionally, our survival rates are reasonable, and even with organ-confined residual disease after NAC, survival outcomes are similar to those who underwent RC alone.</p>","PeriodicalId":9681,"journal":{"name":"Cancers","volume":"17 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11816346/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cancers","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers17030505","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: To investigate neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) eligibility, utilization, and survival outcomes for muscle-invasive bladder cancer patients undergoing radical cystectomy (RC) in a Finnish population.

Materials and methods: Data from the Finnish National Cystectomy Database (2005-2017) was combined with Finnish Cancer Registry survival data. NAC utilization rates were reported, and downstaging rates were calculated based on final pathological staging. Logistic regression analyzed NAC usage and complete response (CR) predictors.

Results: Since 2011, 29% of 1157 patients received NAC. Its usage remained consistent, and the number of eligible patients not receiving NAC decreased during the study period. Among NAC patients, pathology T-category was pT0 (34%), pT1-Ta-Tis (16%), pT2 (23%), pT3 (20%), and pT4 (7%) tumors, with pN0 in 82%. In the RC + NAC group, the 5-year overall survival (OS) rates were 89% for patients with no residual disease (pT0N0), 82% for those with organ-confined residual disease (pT1, Tis, Ta, T2/N0), and 49% for patients with non-organ-confined residual disease (pT3+/N+). The corresponding cancer-specific survival (CSS) rates were 93%, 86%, and 57%, respectively. Patients with organ-confined residual disease after NAC had survival outcomes comparable to those who underwent RC alone. Higher age; odds ratio (OR) 0.93, [95% Confidence Interval (CI): 0.90-0.95] and Charlson Co-morbidity Index-score [OR 0.88 (0.79-0.98)] reduced the likelihood of receiving NAC, while a smaller center size increased the probability [OR 1.82 (1.02-3.28)]. More treatment cycles [OR 0.70, (95% CI: 0.51-0.93)] and a favorable GFR [OR 0.38 (0.16-0.88)] were associated with achieving CR.

Conclusion: We report that NAC is well-utilized across Finland, with CR rates comparable to recent trials. Additionally, our survival rates are reasonable, and even with organ-confined residual disease after NAC, survival outcomes are similar to those who underwent RC alone.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Cancers
Cancers Medicine-Oncology
CiteScore
8.00
自引率
9.60%
发文量
5371
审稿时长
18.07 days
期刊介绍: Cancers (ISSN 2072-6694) is an international, peer-reviewed open access journal on oncology. It publishes reviews, regular research papers and short communications. Our aim is to encourage scientists to publish their experimental and theoretical results in as much detail as possible. There is no restriction on the length of the papers. The full experimental details must be provided so that the results can be reproduced.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信