Associations between Anti-Gay Prejudice, Traditional Masculine Self-Concept, and Colorectal Cancer Screening-Related Outcomes among Black and White Men in the United States.

IF 3.7 3区 医学 Q2 ONCOLOGY
Tianen Chen, Rebekah Wicke, Andy J King, Drew Margolin, Rumi Chunara, Jeff Niederdeppe
{"title":"Associations between Anti-Gay Prejudice, Traditional Masculine Self-Concept, and Colorectal Cancer Screening-Related Outcomes among Black and White Men in the United States.","authors":"Tianen Chen, Rebekah Wicke, Andy J King, Drew Margolin, Rumi Chunara, Jeff Niederdeppe","doi":"10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-24-1590","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Colorectal cancer screening can reduce colorectal cancer risk, yet many men are not up to date with screening guidelines. Although previous qualitative studies have suggested links among anti-gay prejudice, traditional masculine self-concept, racial identity, and colorectal cancer screening among men, scholars have yet to fully explore these associations using quantitative data. This study used a nationally representative sample of Black and White men in the United States to test these associations and examine the sociodemographic correlates.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Using the National Opinion Research Center (NORC)/AmeriSpeak probability-based panel, we recruited a sample of Black and White men in the United States ages 45 to 74 years who had never been diagnosed with colorectal cancer (N = 909). Participants completed an online questionnaire measuring anti-gay prejudice, traditional masculine self-concept, sociodemographic variables, and screening-related outcomes (awareness of screening test options, screening intention, and adherence to screening recommendations).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Black participants reported higher levels of anti-gay prejudice and traditional masculine self-concept than White participants. Anti-gay prejudice was associated with lower awareness and lower screening intention. Black participants reported higher intention to follow screening recommendations but not higher odds of actual adherence than White participants.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Men with anti-gay prejudice are less likely to be aware of colorectal cancer screening test options and less likely to intend to engage in colorectal cancer screening. The results have implications for the design and development of future interventions aimed at increasing colorectal cancer screening rates.</p><p><strong>Impact: </strong>Future studies could develop targeted interventions and observe subsequent changes or conduct longitudinal studies to further explore the role of anti-gay prejudice in colorectal cancer screening.</p>","PeriodicalId":9458,"journal":{"name":"Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention","volume":" ","pages":"714-721"},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12048228/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-24-1590","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Colorectal cancer screening can reduce colorectal cancer risk, yet many men are not up to date with screening guidelines. Although previous qualitative studies have suggested links among anti-gay prejudice, traditional masculine self-concept, racial identity, and colorectal cancer screening among men, scholars have yet to fully explore these associations using quantitative data. This study used a nationally representative sample of Black and White men in the United States to test these associations and examine the sociodemographic correlates.

Methods: Using the National Opinion Research Center (NORC)/AmeriSpeak probability-based panel, we recruited a sample of Black and White men in the United States ages 45 to 74 years who had never been diagnosed with colorectal cancer (N = 909). Participants completed an online questionnaire measuring anti-gay prejudice, traditional masculine self-concept, sociodemographic variables, and screening-related outcomes (awareness of screening test options, screening intention, and adherence to screening recommendations).

Results: Black participants reported higher levels of anti-gay prejudice and traditional masculine self-concept than White participants. Anti-gay prejudice was associated with lower awareness and lower screening intention. Black participants reported higher intention to follow screening recommendations but not higher odds of actual adherence than White participants.

Conclusions: Men with anti-gay prejudice are less likely to be aware of colorectal cancer screening test options and less likely to intend to engage in colorectal cancer screening. The results have implications for the design and development of future interventions aimed at increasing colorectal cancer screening rates.

Impact: Future studies could develop targeted interventions and observe subsequent changes or conduct longitudinal studies to further explore the role of anti-gay prejudice in colorectal cancer screening.

反同性恋偏见、传统男性自我概念与美国黑人和白人男性结直肠癌筛查相关结果之间的关系
背景:结直肠癌(CRC)筛查可以降低结直肠癌的风险,但许多男性不了解最新的筛查指南。虽然之前的定性研究表明反同性恋偏见、传统男性自我概念、种族认同和男性CRC筛查之间存在联系,但学者们尚未利用定量数据充分探索这些联系。这项研究使用了美国黑人和白人男性的全国代表性样本来测试这些关联,并检查社会人口统计学的相关性。方法:使用NORC/AmeriSpeak基于概率的小组,我们在美国招募了45至74岁从未被诊断为CRC的黑人和白人男性样本(N = 909)。参与者完成了一份在线问卷,测量反同性恋偏见、传统男性自我概念、社会人口学变量和筛查相关结果(筛查测试选项的意识、筛查意图和对筛查建议的依从性)。结果:黑人参与者报告的反同性恋偏见和传统男性自我概念水平高于白人参与者。反同性恋偏见与较低的意识和较低的筛查意愿有关。据报道,黑人参与者遵循筛查建议的意愿更高,但实际遵守建议的几率并不比白人参与者高。结论:有反同性恋偏见的男性不太可能意识到CRC筛查试验的选择,也不太可能打算参与CRC筛查。研究结果对未来旨在提高结直肠癌筛查率的干预措施的设计和发展具有启示意义。影响:未来的研究可以制定有针对性的干预措施,观察后续变化或进行纵向研究,进一步探讨反同性恋偏见在结直肠癌筛查中的作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention
Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
6.50
自引率
2.60%
发文量
538
审稿时长
1.6 months
期刊介绍: Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention publishes original peer-reviewed, population-based research on cancer etiology, prevention, surveillance, and survivorship. The following topics are of special interest: descriptive, analytical, and molecular epidemiology; biomarkers including assay development, validation, and application; chemoprevention and other types of prevention research in the context of descriptive and observational studies; the role of behavioral factors in cancer etiology and prevention; survivorship studies; risk factors; implementation science and cancer care delivery; and the science of cancer health disparities. Besides welcoming manuscripts that address individual subjects in any of the relevant disciplines, CEBP editors encourage the submission of manuscripts with a transdisciplinary approach.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信