Distinguishing the effects of vegetation characteristics on soil erosion process on the loess plateau of China

IF 2.8 3区 地球科学 Q2 GEOGRAPHY, PHYSICAL
Jian Fang Wang, Yan Fen Yang, Bing Wang, Guo Bin Liu
{"title":"Distinguishing the effects of vegetation characteristics on soil erosion process on the loess plateau of China","authors":"Jian Fang Wang,&nbsp;Yan Fen Yang,&nbsp;Bing Wang,&nbsp;Guo Bin Liu","doi":"10.1002/esp.70011","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Vegetation restoration significantly decreases soil erosion. Although runoff shear stress is not divided into grain and form shear stresses, the dynamic mechanisms of soil erosion remain unclear. To explore the dynamic mechanisms of soil erosion, two herbaceous plants, namely, <i>Bothriochloa ischcemum</i> (Linn.). Keng (BI) and <i>Artemisia vestita</i> Wall. ex Bess (AG), were planted at six planting densities of 5, 10, 15, 20, 25 and 30 plants m<sup>−2</sup> to obtain different vegetation characteristics. A simulated rainfall experiment (rainfall intensity of 1 mm min<sup>−1</sup>) was conducted on runoff plots (length and width of 2.0 and 0.5 m, respectively), and the flow velocity, runoff rate and soil loss rate were measured. The results showed that the grain and form shear stresses ranged from 0.04 to 0.16 and 1.40 to 3.88 Pa under six planting densities, respectively. Grain shear stress decreased with planting density in both BI and AG grasslands. The form shear stress exhibited a greater magnitude in BI grasslands at a lower planting density, whereas in AG grasslands, the highest form shear stress was observed at a planting density of 20 plants m<sup>−2</sup>. Vegetation can significantly reduce soil loss. Compared with that in bare soil, soil loss amount in the BI and AG grasslands were 68.08 to 95.08% lower. The reduction in soil loss amount was enhanced by the increased planting density. The BI grasslands were more effective in reducing soil loss than the AG grasslands. The amount of soil loss was mainly influenced by the interaction between vegetation and runoff characteristics, which explained the majority of variation (49.48%). The total soil loss increased with increasing grain shear stress and decreased with increasing vegetation coverage, root collar area and soil organic matter as a power function. With increasing total runoff, total soil loss increased linearly. Finally, the amount of soil loss was simulated using the grain shear stress, root collar area, soil organic matter and total runoff. The performance of the model used in this study was satisfactory.</p>","PeriodicalId":11408,"journal":{"name":"Earth Surface Processes and Landforms","volume":"50 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Earth Surface Processes and Landforms","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/esp.70011","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GEOGRAPHY, PHYSICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Vegetation restoration significantly decreases soil erosion. Although runoff shear stress is not divided into grain and form shear stresses, the dynamic mechanisms of soil erosion remain unclear. To explore the dynamic mechanisms of soil erosion, two herbaceous plants, namely, Bothriochloa ischcemum (Linn.). Keng (BI) and Artemisia vestita Wall. ex Bess (AG), were planted at six planting densities of 5, 10, 15, 20, 25 and 30 plants m−2 to obtain different vegetation characteristics. A simulated rainfall experiment (rainfall intensity of 1 mm min−1) was conducted on runoff plots (length and width of 2.0 and 0.5 m, respectively), and the flow velocity, runoff rate and soil loss rate were measured. The results showed that the grain and form shear stresses ranged from 0.04 to 0.16 and 1.40 to 3.88 Pa under six planting densities, respectively. Grain shear stress decreased with planting density in both BI and AG grasslands. The form shear stress exhibited a greater magnitude in BI grasslands at a lower planting density, whereas in AG grasslands, the highest form shear stress was observed at a planting density of 20 plants m−2. Vegetation can significantly reduce soil loss. Compared with that in bare soil, soil loss amount in the BI and AG grasslands were 68.08 to 95.08% lower. The reduction in soil loss amount was enhanced by the increased planting density. The BI grasslands were more effective in reducing soil loss than the AG grasslands. The amount of soil loss was mainly influenced by the interaction between vegetation and runoff characteristics, which explained the majority of variation (49.48%). The total soil loss increased with increasing grain shear stress and decreased with increasing vegetation coverage, root collar area and soil organic matter as a power function. With increasing total runoff, total soil loss increased linearly. Finally, the amount of soil loss was simulated using the grain shear stress, root collar area, soil organic matter and total runoff. The performance of the model used in this study was satisfactory.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Earth Surface Processes and Landforms
Earth Surface Processes and Landforms 地学-地球科学综合
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
12.10%
发文量
215
审稿时长
4 months
期刊介绍: Earth Surface Processes and Landforms is an interdisciplinary international journal concerned with: the interactions between surface processes and landforms and landscapes; that lead to physical, chemical and biological changes; and which in turn create; current landscapes and the geological record of past landscapes. Its focus is core to both physical geographical and geological communities, and also the wider geosciences
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信