Comparison of Methods for Isolation and Characterization of Total and Astrocyte-Enriched Extracellular Vesicles From Human Serum and Plasma

Leandra K. Figueroa-Hall, Kaiping Burrows, Ahlam M. Alarbi, Bethany N. Hannafon, Cole Hladik, Chibing Tan, Rajagopal Ramesh, Jennifer L. Stewart, Victoria B. Risbrough, Martin P. Paulus, T. Kent Teague
{"title":"Comparison of Methods for Isolation and Characterization of Total and Astrocyte-Enriched Extracellular Vesicles From Human Serum and Plasma","authors":"Leandra K. Figueroa-Hall,&nbsp;Kaiping Burrows,&nbsp;Ahlam M. Alarbi,&nbsp;Bethany N. Hannafon,&nbsp;Cole Hladik,&nbsp;Chibing Tan,&nbsp;Rajagopal Ramesh,&nbsp;Jennifer L. Stewart,&nbsp;Victoria B. Risbrough,&nbsp;Martin P. Paulus,&nbsp;T. Kent Teague","doi":"10.1002/jex2.70035","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Extracellular vesicles (EV) which play critical roles in intercellular communication, have garnered interest as biomarkers with researchers studying brain-related disease processes due to their ability to be isolated from various biofluids. Astrocytes, a type of glial cell, play a critical role in neuronal regulation and function. As such, EV enriched from astrocytes can be used to interrogate cargo and identify mechanisms by which astrocytes communicate with other cells of the central nervous system or shed light on pathophysiological conditions. This manuscript compared five EV isolation methods (differential ultracentrifugation [dUC], precipitation, precipitation + purification, silicon carbon resin and size exclusion chromatography [SEC]) using small volumes of human plasma and serum with a focus on immunocapture of astrocyte-enriched EV (AEEV), with the excitatory amino acid transporter 1, or GLAST. Methods were evaluated on yield, purity, recovery and downstream application to include immunoassays for tetraspanin, immune and astrocyte markers. Results revealed that whilst precipitation-based methods such as ExoQuick yielded higher EV concentrations, size exclusion (SmartSEC, qEV) provided greater purity, emphasizing a trade-off between yield and purity. This study provides a comprehensive resource for researchers in selecting EV isolation methods tailored to small biobanked clinical samples, with the goal of advancing biomarker discovery in Neuroscience.</p>","PeriodicalId":73747,"journal":{"name":"Journal of extracellular biology","volume":"4 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/jex2.70035","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of extracellular biology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jex2.70035","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Extracellular vesicles (EV) which play critical roles in intercellular communication, have garnered interest as biomarkers with researchers studying brain-related disease processes due to their ability to be isolated from various biofluids. Astrocytes, a type of glial cell, play a critical role in neuronal regulation and function. As such, EV enriched from astrocytes can be used to interrogate cargo and identify mechanisms by which astrocytes communicate with other cells of the central nervous system or shed light on pathophysiological conditions. This manuscript compared five EV isolation methods (differential ultracentrifugation [dUC], precipitation, precipitation + purification, silicon carbon resin and size exclusion chromatography [SEC]) using small volumes of human plasma and serum with a focus on immunocapture of astrocyte-enriched EV (AEEV), with the excitatory amino acid transporter 1, or GLAST. Methods were evaluated on yield, purity, recovery and downstream application to include immunoassays for tetraspanin, immune and astrocyte markers. Results revealed that whilst precipitation-based methods such as ExoQuick yielded higher EV concentrations, size exclusion (SmartSEC, qEV) provided greater purity, emphasizing a trade-off between yield and purity. This study provides a comprehensive resource for researchers in selecting EV isolation methods tailored to small biobanked clinical samples, with the goal of advancing biomarker discovery in Neuroscience.

Abstract Image

人血清和血浆中总囊泡和富含星形胶质细胞的细胞外囊泡的分离和表征方法的比较
细胞外囊泡(EV)在细胞间通讯中起着至关重要的作用,由于它们能够从各种生物流体中分离出来,因此作为研究脑相关疾病过程的生物标志物引起了研究人员的兴趣。星形胶质细胞是一种胶质细胞,在神经元的调节和功能中起着至关重要的作用。因此,从星形胶质细胞富集的EV可用于询问货物和确定星形胶质细胞与中枢神经系统其他细胞通信的机制或阐明病理生理状况。本文比较了使用小体积人血浆和血清的五种EV分离方法(差示超离心[dUC]、沉淀、沉淀+纯化、硅碳树脂和粒径排除色谱[SEC]),重点研究了星形胶质细胞富集EV (AEEV)和兴奋性氨基酸转运蛋白1 (GLAST)的免疫捕获。评估了产率、纯度、回收率和下游应用的方法,包括四球蛋白、免疫和星形胶质细胞标记物的免疫测定。结果显示,虽然基于沉淀的方法(如ExoQuick)产生更高的EV浓度,但尺寸排除(SmartSEC, qEV)提供更高的纯度,强调了产量和纯度之间的权衡。本研究为研究人员选择适合于小生物库临床样本的EV分离方法提供了全面的资源,旨在推进神经科学领域的生物标志物发现。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信