Why Has Gastroschisis Increased Over Time and Why Is It More Common in Infants of Young Mothers?

IF 1.6 4区 医学 Q4 DEVELOPMENTAL BIOLOGY
Rashida S. Smith-Webb, Peter H. Langlois, Gary M. Shaw, Cynthia A. Moore, Mark A. Canfield, Julie M. Petersen, Martha M. Werler, the National Birth Defects Prevention Study
{"title":"Why Has Gastroschisis Increased Over Time and Why Is It More Common in Infants of Young Mothers?","authors":"Rashida S. Smith-Webb,&nbsp;Peter H. Langlois,&nbsp;Gary M. Shaw,&nbsp;Cynthia A. Moore,&nbsp;Mark A. Canfield,&nbsp;Julie M. Petersen,&nbsp;Martha M. Werler,&nbsp;the National Birth Defects Prevention Study","doi":"10.1002/bdr2.2436","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>Although many factors are associated with gastroschisis risk, studies have not systematically explored whether they account for its increasing frequency over the past decades or its inverse association with maternal age. We examined whether previously reported risk factors for gastroschisis from the National Birth Defects Prevention Study (NBDPS) explain the association with increasing temporal prevalence or young maternal age.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>Using data from the NBDPS (1997–2011), crude odds ratios (ORs) were calculated for birth years 2005–2011 versus 1997–2004 and maternal age &lt; 25 versus 25+ years. We then adjusted for 16 factors separately with logistic regression (paternal age, interpregnancy interval, parity, alcohol, cigarettes, illicit drugs, oral contraceptives, cold/flu with fever, genitourinary infection, polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons, diet quality, prepregnancy body mass index, parental race and ethnicity, language spoken at home, years lived in the United States, and household income).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>The birth year OR (1.28; 95% CI: 1.14, 1.44) was attenuated by 16% after adjustment for polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon exposure (OR 1.08; 95 CI: 0.92, 1.26). The young maternal age OR (7.76; 95% CI: 6.71, 8.97) was attenuated by 30% after adjustment for paternal age (OR 5.43; 95% CI: 4.55, 6.48) and separately for interpregnancy interval (OR 5.45; 95% CI: 4.43, 6.69).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>Some evidence suggests that risk factors for gastroschisis account for small amounts of the time trend and maternal age associations. However, it remains unclear what factors underlie the complete calendar time or maternal age associations.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":9121,"journal":{"name":"Birth Defects Research","volume":"117 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Birth Defects Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/bdr2.2436","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"DEVELOPMENTAL BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Although many factors are associated with gastroschisis risk, studies have not systematically explored whether they account for its increasing frequency over the past decades or its inverse association with maternal age. We examined whether previously reported risk factors for gastroschisis from the National Birth Defects Prevention Study (NBDPS) explain the association with increasing temporal prevalence or young maternal age.

Methods

Using data from the NBDPS (1997–2011), crude odds ratios (ORs) were calculated for birth years 2005–2011 versus 1997–2004 and maternal age < 25 versus 25+ years. We then adjusted for 16 factors separately with logistic regression (paternal age, interpregnancy interval, parity, alcohol, cigarettes, illicit drugs, oral contraceptives, cold/flu with fever, genitourinary infection, polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons, diet quality, prepregnancy body mass index, parental race and ethnicity, language spoken at home, years lived in the United States, and household income).

Results

The birth year OR (1.28; 95% CI: 1.14, 1.44) was attenuated by 16% after adjustment for polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon exposure (OR 1.08; 95 CI: 0.92, 1.26). The young maternal age OR (7.76; 95% CI: 6.71, 8.97) was attenuated by 30% after adjustment for paternal age (OR 5.43; 95% CI: 4.55, 6.48) and separately for interpregnancy interval (OR 5.45; 95% CI: 4.43, 6.69).

Conclusion

Some evidence suggests that risk factors for gastroschisis account for small amounts of the time trend and maternal age associations. However, it remains unclear what factors underlie the complete calendar time or maternal age associations.

为什么胃裂随着时间的推移而增加?为什么在年轻母亲的婴儿中更常见?
背景:虽然许多因素与胃裂风险相关,但研究尚未系统地探讨它们是否解释了过去几十年来胃裂发生率的增加或与母亲年龄的负相关。我们检查了国家出生缺陷预防研究(NBDPS)中先前报道的胃裂危险因素是否与时间患病率增加或产妇年龄年轻有关。方法使用1997-2011年NBDPS数据,计算2005-2011年出生年份与1997-2004年出生年份、25岁与25岁以上母亲的粗优势比(or)。然后,我们用logistic回归分别调整了16个因素(父亲年龄、解释间隔、胎次、酒精、香烟、非法药物、口服避孕药、感冒/流感伴发烧、泌尿生殖系统感染、多环芳烃、饮食质量、孕前体重指数、父母种族和民族、家中使用的语言、在美国居住的年数和家庭收入)。结果出生年份OR (1.28;校正多环芳烃暴露后,95% CI: 1.14, 1.44)降低了16% (OR 1.08;95 ci: 0.92, 1.26)。年轻产妇年龄OR (7.76;95% CI: 6.71, 8.97)在调整父亲年龄后降低了30% (OR 5.43;95% CI: 4.55, 6.48),可解释性区间(OR 5.45;95% ci: 4.43, 6.69)。结论有证据表明胃裂的危险因素在时间趋势和产妇年龄相关性中占很小的比例。然而,目前尚不清楚是什么因素导致了完整的日历时间或母亲年龄的关联。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Birth Defects Research
Birth Defects Research Medicine-Embryology
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
9.50%
发文量
153
期刊介绍: The journal Birth Defects Research publishes original research and reviews in areas related to the etiology of adverse developmental and reproductive outcome. In particular the journal is devoted to the publication of original scientific research that contributes to the understanding of the biology of embryonic development and the prenatal causative factors and mechanisms leading to adverse pregnancy outcomes, namely structural and functional birth defects, pregnancy loss, postnatal functional defects in the human population, and to the identification of prenatal factors and biological mechanisms that reduce these risks. Adverse reproductive and developmental outcomes may have genetic, environmental, nutritional or epigenetic causes. Accordingly, the journal Birth Defects Research takes an integrated, multidisciplinary approach in its organization and publication strategy. The journal Birth Defects Research contains separate sections for clinical and molecular teratology, developmental and reproductive toxicology, and reviews in developmental biology to acknowledge and accommodate the integrative nature of research in this field. Each section has a dedicated editor who is a leader in his/her field and who has full editorial authority in his/her area.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信