Exploring the spectrum: an environmental examination of hydrogen's diverse colors

IF 3.2 Q2 CHEMISTRY, PHYSICAL
Energy advances Pub Date : 2024-12-17 DOI:10.1039/D4YA00570H
Hafsa Mehmood, Haseeb Akbar, Pariyapat Nilsalab and Shabbir H. Gheewala
{"title":"Exploring the spectrum: an environmental examination of hydrogen's diverse colors","authors":"Hafsa Mehmood, Haseeb Akbar, Pariyapat Nilsalab and Shabbir H. Gheewala","doi":"10.1039/D4YA00570H","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p >Hydrogen is emerging as an immense source of energy having the potential to at least partly replace fossil fuels. It is an abundant element on earth, but does not mainly exist in free form. Hydrogen can be produced through different technologies and feedstocks, and based on these, it can be categorized into colors with different environmental impacts. This work aimed to review the environmental impacts of the production of gray (from natural gas without carbon capture and storage), brown (from coal gasification), blue (from fossil fuels with carbon capture and storage), green (from renewable energy or biological process), and turquoise (pyrolysis of natural gas) hydrogen and to identify sustainable hydrogen production pathways that minimize environmental impacts. Global warming, acidification, eutrophication, and resource depletion were considered as indicators to assess the environmental impacts. The results showed that brown hydrogen produced <em>via</em> coal gasification had the highest global warming, acidification, and resource depletion impacts among all the options considered. On the other hand, green hydrogen from electrolysis through wind energy had the lowest environmental impacts. However, adopting these hydrogen colors presents different challenges and opportunities. Success depends on effective policy frameworks, international cooperation, and technological readiness to ensure positive contributions to global sustainability goals.</p>","PeriodicalId":72913,"journal":{"name":"Energy advances","volume":" 2","pages":" 224-238"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://pubs.rsc.org/en/content/articlepdf/2025/ya/d4ya00570h?page=search","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Energy advances","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://pubs.rsc.org/en/content/articlelanding/2025/ya/d4ya00570h","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, PHYSICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Hydrogen is emerging as an immense source of energy having the potential to at least partly replace fossil fuels. It is an abundant element on earth, but does not mainly exist in free form. Hydrogen can be produced through different technologies and feedstocks, and based on these, it can be categorized into colors with different environmental impacts. This work aimed to review the environmental impacts of the production of gray (from natural gas without carbon capture and storage), brown (from coal gasification), blue (from fossil fuels with carbon capture and storage), green (from renewable energy or biological process), and turquoise (pyrolysis of natural gas) hydrogen and to identify sustainable hydrogen production pathways that minimize environmental impacts. Global warming, acidification, eutrophication, and resource depletion were considered as indicators to assess the environmental impacts. The results showed that brown hydrogen produced via coal gasification had the highest global warming, acidification, and resource depletion impacts among all the options considered. On the other hand, green hydrogen from electrolysis through wind energy had the lowest environmental impacts. However, adopting these hydrogen colors presents different challenges and opportunities. Success depends on effective policy frameworks, international cooperation, and technological readiness to ensure positive contributions to global sustainability goals.

Abstract Image

探索光谱:氢的不同颜色的环境检查
氢正在成为一种巨大的能源,至少在一定程度上有可能取代化石燃料。它是地球上丰富的元素,但主要不是以自由形式存在。氢气可以通过不同的技术和原料生产,基于这些,它可以被分类成不同的颜色,对环境产生不同的影响。这项工作旨在审查灰色氢(来自没有碳捕获和储存的天然气)、棕色氢(来自煤炭气化)、蓝色氢(来自碳捕获和储存的化石燃料)、绿色氢(来自可再生能源或生物过程)和绿松石氢(天然气热解)的生产对环境的影响,并确定可持续的氢生产途径,最大限度地减少对环境的影响。将全球变暖、酸化、富营养化和资源枯竭作为评价环境影响的指标。结果表明,在所有考虑的选项中,通过煤气化产生的棕色氢对全球变暖、酸化和资源枯竭的影响最大。另一方面,通过风能电解产生的绿色氢对环境的影响最小。然而,采用这些氢颜色带来了不同的挑战和机遇。成功取决于有效的政策框架、国际合作和技术准备,以确保对全球可持续性目标作出积极贡献。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信