Basic emotion detection accuracy using artificial intelligence approaches in facial emotions recognition system: A systematic review

IF 7.2 1区计算机科学 Q1 COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE

Applied Soft Computing Pub Date : 2025-02-11 DOI:10.1016/j.asoc.2025.112867

Chia-Feng Hsu , Sriyani Padmalatha Konara Mudiyanselage , Rismia Agustina , Mei-Feng Lin

{"title":"Basic emotion detection accuracy using artificial intelligence approaches in facial emotions recognition system: A systematic review","authors":"Chia-Feng Hsu , Sriyani Padmalatha Konara Mudiyanselage , Rismia Agustina , Mei-Feng Lin","doi":"10.1016/j.asoc.2025.112867","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Facial emotion recognition (FER) systems are pivotal in advancing human communication by interpreting emotions such as happiness, sadness, anger, fear, surprise, and disgust through artificial intelligence (AI). This systematic review examines the accuracy of detecting basic emotions, evaluates the features, algorithms, and datasets used in FER systems, and proposes a taxonomy for their integration into healthcare. A comprehensive search of six databases, covering publications from January 1990 to March 2023, identified 4073 articles, with 35 studies meeting inclusion criteria.</div><div>The review revealed that happiness and surprise achieved the highest mean detection accuracies (96.42 % and 96.32 %, respectively), whereas anger and disgust exhibited lower accuracies (91.68 % and 93.71 %, respectively). Fear and sadness had a mean accuracy of 93.87 %. Among AI algorithms, GFFNN demonstrated the highest accuracy (100 %), followed by KNN (97.99 %) and DDBNN (97.77 %). CNN and SVM were the most commonly used algorithms, showing competitive accuracies. The CK+ dataset, while extensively employed, demonstrated a mean accuracy of 96.08 %, lower than RAVDESS, Oulu-CASIA, and other databases.</div><div>This taxonomy provides insights into FER systems' capabilities to enhance patient care by identifying emotional states, pain levels, and overall well-being. Future research should adopt diverse datasets and advanced algorithms to improve FER accuracy, enabling robust integration of these systems into healthcare practices.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":50737,"journal":{"name":"Applied Soft Computing","volume":"172 ","pages":"Article 112867"},"PeriodicalIF":7.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Applied Soft Computing","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1568494625001784","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Abstract

Facial emotion recognition (FER) systems are pivotal in advancing human communication by interpreting emotions such as happiness, sadness, anger, fear, surprise, and disgust through artificial intelligence (AI). This systematic review examines the accuracy of detecting basic emotions, evaluates the features, algorithms, and datasets used in FER systems, and proposes a taxonomy for their integration into healthcare. A comprehensive search of six databases, covering publications from January 1990 to March 2023, identified 4073 articles, with 35 studies meeting inclusion criteria.

The review revealed that happiness and surprise achieved the highest mean detection accuracies (96.42 % and 96.32 %, respectively), whereas anger and disgust exhibited lower accuracies (91.68 % and 93.71 %, respectively). Fear and sadness had a mean accuracy of 93.87 %. Among AI algorithms, GFFNN demonstrated the highest accuracy (100 %), followed by KNN (97.99 %) and DDBNN (97.77 %). CNN and SVM were the most commonly used algorithms, showing competitive accuracies. The CK+ dataset, while extensively employed, demonstrated a mean accuracy of 96.08 %, lower than RAVDESS, Oulu-CASIA, and other databases.

This taxonomy provides insights into FER systems' capabilities to enhance patient care by identifying emotional states, pain levels, and overall well-being. Future research should adopt diverse datasets and advanced algorithms to improve FER accuracy, enabling robust integration of these systems into healthcare practices.

查看原文本刊更多论文

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Applied Soft Computing 工程技术-计算机：跨学科应用

CiteScore

15.80

自引率

6.90%

发文量

874

审稿时长

10.9 months

期刊介绍： Applied Soft Computing is an international journal promoting an integrated view of soft computing to solve real life problems.The focus is to publish the highest quality research in application and convergence of the areas of Fuzzy Logic, Neural Networks, Evolutionary Computing, Rough Sets and other similar techniques to address real world complexities. Applied Soft Computing is a rolling publication: articles are published as soon as the editor-in-chief has accepted them. Therefore, the web site will continuously be updated with new articles and the publication time will be short.