The impact of HPV vaccine disinformation and misinformation in disadvantaged educational settings in Ireland: A multi-year analysis of a school immunisation system

IF 4.5 3区 医学 Q2 IMMUNOLOGY
Allison Deane , Christine White , Yvonne Morrissey , Lucy Jessop , Suzanne Cotter , Lois O. Connor , Vicky McKenna , Aishwarya Vivekkumar , Tony Fitzgerald , Chantal Migone
{"title":"The impact of HPV vaccine disinformation and misinformation in disadvantaged educational settings in Ireland: A multi-year analysis of a school immunisation system","authors":"Allison Deane ,&nbsp;Christine White ,&nbsp;Yvonne Morrissey ,&nbsp;Lucy Jessop ,&nbsp;Suzanne Cotter ,&nbsp;Lois O. Connor ,&nbsp;Vicky McKenna ,&nbsp;Aishwarya Vivekkumar ,&nbsp;Tony Fitzgerald ,&nbsp;Chantal Migone","doi":"10.1016/j.vaccine.2025.126868","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><div>Introduced in 2010, Ireland's school-based HPV immunisation programme has shown lower vaccine uptake in disadvantaged DEIS (Delivering Equality of Opportunity in Schools) schools compared to non-DEIS schools. This study aims to determine if the HPV vaccine misinformation period (2015–2017) disproportionately affected DEIS schools.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>This is a register-based cohort study that used routinely collected data on HPV vaccination uptake in girls only, combined with DEIS status from the Department of Education. The analysis covered six academic years (2013–2019), focusing on three periods: 1) Prior to vaccine misinformation (academic years 2013–2014/2014–2015), 2) During misinformation (academic years 2015–2016/2016–2017), and 3) Recovery (academic years 2017–2018/2018–2019).</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Overall HPV vaccination uptake was 84.8 % before the misinformation, dropped to 55.2 % during the misinformation, and increased to 72.9 % during the recovery period. The uptake difference between DEIS and non-DEIS schools was 4.5 % (95 % CI 1.80–7.17) before the misinformation, 8.0 % (95 % CI 5.35–10.68) during misinformation, and 12.4 % (95 % CI 9.80–14.91) in the recovery period, with DEIS schools showing reduced recovery compared to non-DEIS schools (64.5 % vs 76.5 %; <em>p</em> &lt; 0.001).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>HPV vaccine misinformation disproportionately affected HPV vaccine uptake in disadvantaged schools. Tailored interventions are needed to address this disparity in DEIS schools.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":23491,"journal":{"name":"Vaccine","volume":"51 ","pages":"Article 126868"},"PeriodicalIF":4.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Vaccine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0264410X25001653","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"IMMUNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose

Introduced in 2010, Ireland's school-based HPV immunisation programme has shown lower vaccine uptake in disadvantaged DEIS (Delivering Equality of Opportunity in Schools) schools compared to non-DEIS schools. This study aims to determine if the HPV vaccine misinformation period (2015–2017) disproportionately affected DEIS schools.

Methods

This is a register-based cohort study that used routinely collected data on HPV vaccination uptake in girls only, combined with DEIS status from the Department of Education. The analysis covered six academic years (2013–2019), focusing on three periods: 1) Prior to vaccine misinformation (academic years 2013–2014/2014–2015), 2) During misinformation (academic years 2015–2016/2016–2017), and 3) Recovery (academic years 2017–2018/2018–2019).

Results

Overall HPV vaccination uptake was 84.8 % before the misinformation, dropped to 55.2 % during the misinformation, and increased to 72.9 % during the recovery period. The uptake difference between DEIS and non-DEIS schools was 4.5 % (95 % CI 1.80–7.17) before the misinformation, 8.0 % (95 % CI 5.35–10.68) during misinformation, and 12.4 % (95 % CI 9.80–14.91) in the recovery period, with DEIS schools showing reduced recovery compared to non-DEIS schools (64.5 % vs 76.5 %; p < 0.001).

Conclusion

HPV vaccine misinformation disproportionately affected HPV vaccine uptake in disadvantaged schools. Tailored interventions are needed to address this disparity in DEIS schools.
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Vaccine
Vaccine 医学-免疫学
CiteScore
8.70
自引率
5.50%
发文量
992
审稿时长
131 days
期刊介绍: Vaccine is unique in publishing the highest quality science across all disciplines relevant to the field of vaccinology - all original article submissions across basic and clinical research, vaccine manufacturing, history, public policy, behavioral science and ethics, social sciences, safety, and many other related areas are welcomed. The submission categories as given in the Guide for Authors indicate where we receive the most papers. Papers outside these major areas are also welcome and authors are encouraged to contact us with specific questions.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信