Impact of offsets on GNSS time series stochastic noise properties and velocity estimation

IF 2.8 3区 地球科学 Q2 ASTRONOMY & ASTROPHYSICS
Jiahui Huang , Xiaoxing He , Shunqiang Hu , Feng Ming
{"title":"Impact of offsets on GNSS time series stochastic noise properties and velocity estimation","authors":"Jiahui Huang ,&nbsp;Xiaoxing He ,&nbsp;Shunqiang Hu ,&nbsp;Feng Ming","doi":"10.1016/j.asr.2024.12.016","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This study systematically investigates the efficiency of RMLE and MLE algorithms for noise model identification using various information criteria and examines the influence of offsets on noise properties and velocity estimation. Through experimental analysis on simulated GNSS time series, we confirm that RMLE and MLE accurately discriminate among four different noise models using AIC, BIC, and BIC_tp information criteria. For time series longer than 15 years, RMLE is recommended as the default method, while MLE outperforms RMLE for short time series when the underlying noise model is FN, PL, or GGM. RMLE proves more sensitive to the RW component than the MLE algorithm, particularly with shorter time series (less than 10 years). We also confirm that the addition of offsets does not transform non-GGM optimal noise models into GGM noise models, further supporting that GGM noise models in GNSS time series are not an artifact and that residual offsets are not the underlying cause of GNSS position time series exhibiting GGMWN characteristics. For selected real GNSS time series without offsets from Extended Solid Earth Science ESDR System, we further confirm that PLWN and FNWN remain the primary noise processes best describing GNSS time series. A noteworthy discovery is the observation of more RW components (approximately 19.22 %) than in previous research with 15-year long-term GNSS time series using the RMLE algorithm. Additionally, we still find GGM as the optimal noise model in the vertical component, ensuring it is real and not an artifact. Furthermore, even with artificially induced frequent offsets, we observe that only about 0.35 % of sites’ optimal noise models change from non-GGMWN models to GGMWN, consistent with the simulated GNSS time series experiments.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":50850,"journal":{"name":"Advances in Space Research","volume":"75 4","pages":"Pages 3397-3413"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advances in Space Research","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0273117724012286","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ASTRONOMY & ASTROPHYSICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study systematically investigates the efficiency of RMLE and MLE algorithms for noise model identification using various information criteria and examines the influence of offsets on noise properties and velocity estimation. Through experimental analysis on simulated GNSS time series, we confirm that RMLE and MLE accurately discriminate among four different noise models using AIC, BIC, and BIC_tp information criteria. For time series longer than 15 years, RMLE is recommended as the default method, while MLE outperforms RMLE for short time series when the underlying noise model is FN, PL, or GGM. RMLE proves more sensitive to the RW component than the MLE algorithm, particularly with shorter time series (less than 10 years). We also confirm that the addition of offsets does not transform non-GGM optimal noise models into GGM noise models, further supporting that GGM noise models in GNSS time series are not an artifact and that residual offsets are not the underlying cause of GNSS position time series exhibiting GGMWN characteristics. For selected real GNSS time series without offsets from Extended Solid Earth Science ESDR System, we further confirm that PLWN and FNWN remain the primary noise processes best describing GNSS time series. A noteworthy discovery is the observation of more RW components (approximately 19.22 %) than in previous research with 15-year long-term GNSS time series using the RMLE algorithm. Additionally, we still find GGM as the optimal noise model in the vertical component, ensuring it is real and not an artifact. Furthermore, even with artificially induced frequent offsets, we observe that only about 0.35 % of sites’ optimal noise models change from non-GGMWN models to GGMWN, consistent with the simulated GNSS time series experiments.
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Advances in Space Research
Advances in Space Research 地学天文-地球科学综合
CiteScore
5.20
自引率
11.50%
发文量
800
审稿时长
5.8 months
期刊介绍: The COSPAR publication Advances in Space Research (ASR) is an open journal covering all areas of space research including: space studies of the Earth''s surface, meteorology, climate, the Earth-Moon system, planets and small bodies of the solar system, upper atmospheres, ionospheres and magnetospheres of the Earth and planets including reference atmospheres, space plasmas in the solar system, astrophysics from space, materials sciences in space, fundamental physics in space, space debris, space weather, Earth observations of space phenomena, etc. NB: Please note that manuscripts related to life sciences as related to space are no more accepted for submission to Advances in Space Research. Such manuscripts should now be submitted to the new COSPAR Journal Life Sciences in Space Research (LSSR). All submissions are reviewed by two scientists in the field. COSPAR is an interdisciplinary scientific organization concerned with the progress of space research on an international scale. Operating under the rules of ICSU, COSPAR ignores political considerations and considers all questions solely from the scientific viewpoint.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信