Gordon Brestrich , Madiha Shafquat , Frederick J. Angulo , Alexander Davidson , Kristian Lie , Kate Halsby , Julie Davis , Jennifer Moïsi , James H. Stark
{"title":"Estimation of medically-attended LB incidence in Norway, Finland and Poland using data from national surveillance and published literature","authors":"Gordon Brestrich , Madiha Shafquat , Frederick J. Angulo , Alexander Davidson , Kristian Lie , Kate Halsby , Julie Davis , Jennifer Moïsi , James H. Stark","doi":"10.1016/j.ttbdis.2025.102454","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Lyme borreliosis (LB) is the most common tick-borne disease in Europe. Many European countries conduct LB surveillance, but these data do not always capture the complete burden on the healthcare system and are difficult to compare across countries due to unstandardized reporting procedures. In this study, we combined data from public health surveillance and published literature to estimate the incidence of patients with LB seeking healthcare by clinical manifestation in Norway, Finland, and Poland.</div><div>Surveillance data in each country were combined with medical administrative datasets (e.g., public health registries, claims databases, electronic medical records) to estimate the incidence of medically-attended LB. These estimates were adjusted to exclude cases that were not prescribed LB-specific antibiotics, and remove cases present in multiple datasets. Country-specific distributions of clinical manifestations were used to obtain medically-attended incidence by clinical manifestation. We estimated a high incidence of medically-attended LB in Norway (213.2 / 100,000 population per year [PPY]), Finland (116.4 / 100,000 PPY), and Poland (130.9 / 100,000 PPY). This corresponds to 67,578 annual cases or 2.7 times more than reported by surveillance in these countries. Incidence of disseminated LB was also substantial with 9.9, 36.3 and 6.2/ 100,000 PPY in Norway, Finland and Poland respectively corresponding to a total of 4,920 annual cases. This study provides estimates for incidence of medically-attended LB, including disseminated LB, in three European countries and highlights the limitations of surveillance data alone in assessing LB burden.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":49320,"journal":{"name":"Ticks and Tick-borne Diseases","volume":"16 2","pages":"Article 102454"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ticks and Tick-borne Diseases","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1877959X25000184","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"INFECTIOUS DISEASES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Lyme borreliosis (LB) is the most common tick-borne disease in Europe. Many European countries conduct LB surveillance, but these data do not always capture the complete burden on the healthcare system and are difficult to compare across countries due to unstandardized reporting procedures. In this study, we combined data from public health surveillance and published literature to estimate the incidence of patients with LB seeking healthcare by clinical manifestation in Norway, Finland, and Poland.
Surveillance data in each country were combined with medical administrative datasets (e.g., public health registries, claims databases, electronic medical records) to estimate the incidence of medically-attended LB. These estimates were adjusted to exclude cases that were not prescribed LB-specific antibiotics, and remove cases present in multiple datasets. Country-specific distributions of clinical manifestations were used to obtain medically-attended incidence by clinical manifestation. We estimated a high incidence of medically-attended LB in Norway (213.2 / 100,000 population per year [PPY]), Finland (116.4 / 100,000 PPY), and Poland (130.9 / 100,000 PPY). This corresponds to 67,578 annual cases or 2.7 times more than reported by surveillance in these countries. Incidence of disseminated LB was also substantial with 9.9, 36.3 and 6.2/ 100,000 PPY in Norway, Finland and Poland respectively corresponding to a total of 4,920 annual cases. This study provides estimates for incidence of medically-attended LB, including disseminated LB, in three European countries and highlights the limitations of surveillance data alone in assessing LB burden.
期刊介绍:
Ticks and Tick-borne Diseases is an international, peer-reviewed scientific journal. It publishes original research papers, short communications, state-of-the-art mini-reviews, letters to the editor, clinical-case studies, announcements of pertinent international meetings, and editorials.
The journal covers a broad spectrum and brings together various disciplines, for example, zoology, microbiology, molecular biology, genetics, mathematical modelling, veterinary and human medicine. Multidisciplinary approaches and the use of conventional and novel methods/methodologies (in the field and in the laboratory) are crucial for deeper understanding of the natural processes and human behaviour/activities that result in human or animal diseases and in economic effects of ticks and tick-borne pathogens. Such understanding is essential for management of tick populations and tick-borne diseases in an effective and environmentally acceptable manner.