Differences in Head Motion During Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging Across Pediatric Neuropsychiatric Disorders

IF 4 Q2 NEUROSCIENCES
Tracey C. Shi , Katherine Durham , Rachel Marsh , David Pagliaccio
{"title":"Differences in Head Motion During Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging Across Pediatric Neuropsychiatric Disorders","authors":"Tracey C. Shi ,&nbsp;Katherine Durham ,&nbsp;Rachel Marsh ,&nbsp;David Pagliaccio","doi":"10.1016/j.bpsgos.2024.100446","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Robust correction for head motion during functional magnetic resonance imaging is critical to avoid artifact-driven findings. Despite head motion differences across neuropsychiatric disorders, pediatric head motion across a range of diagnoses and covariates has not yet been evaluated. We tested 4 preregistered hypotheses: 1) externalizing disorder diagnoses will associate with more head motion during scanning; 2) internalizing disorder diagnoses will associate with less motion; 3) among children without attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder, externalizing disorders will associate with more motion; and 4) among children with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder, comorbid internalizing disorders will associate with less motion.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Healthy Brain Network data releases 1.0–7.0 (<em>n</em> = 971) were analyzed in a discovery phase, and additional data released by February 29, 2024 (<em>n</em> = 437) were used in confirmatory analyses. Linear mixed-effects models were fitted with in-scanner head motion as the dependent variable. Binary independent variables of interest assessed for the presence or absence of externalizing or internalizing disorders.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The confirmatory sample did not show significant associations between head motion and externalizing or internalizing disorders or support for the preregistered hypotheses. Across samples, there was a consistent interaction between age and neurodevelopmental diagnoses such that age-related decreases in head motion were attenuated in children with neurodevelopmental disorders.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Head motion remains an important confound in pediatric neuroimaging that may be associated with many factors, including neuropsychiatric symptoms, age, cognitive and physical attributes, and interactions among these variables. This work takes a step toward parsing these complex associations, focusing on neuropsychiatric diagnoses, age, and their interaction.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":72373,"journal":{"name":"Biological psychiatry global open science","volume":"5 3","pages":"Article 100446"},"PeriodicalIF":4.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biological psychiatry global open science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2667174324001599","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Robust correction for head motion during functional magnetic resonance imaging is critical to avoid artifact-driven findings. Despite head motion differences across neuropsychiatric disorders, pediatric head motion across a range of diagnoses and covariates has not yet been evaluated. We tested 4 preregistered hypotheses: 1) externalizing disorder diagnoses will associate with more head motion during scanning; 2) internalizing disorder diagnoses will associate with less motion; 3) among children without attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder, externalizing disorders will associate with more motion; and 4) among children with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder, comorbid internalizing disorders will associate with less motion.

Methods

Healthy Brain Network data releases 1.0–7.0 (n = 971) were analyzed in a discovery phase, and additional data released by February 29, 2024 (n = 437) were used in confirmatory analyses. Linear mixed-effects models were fitted with in-scanner head motion as the dependent variable. Binary independent variables of interest assessed for the presence or absence of externalizing or internalizing disorders.

Results

The confirmatory sample did not show significant associations between head motion and externalizing or internalizing disorders or support for the preregistered hypotheses. Across samples, there was a consistent interaction between age and neurodevelopmental diagnoses such that age-related decreases in head motion were attenuated in children with neurodevelopmental disorders.

Conclusions

Head motion remains an important confound in pediatric neuroimaging that may be associated with many factors, including neuropsychiatric symptoms, age, cognitive and physical attributes, and interactions among these variables. This work takes a step toward parsing these complex associations, focusing on neuropsychiatric diagnoses, age, and their interaction.
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Biological psychiatry global open science
Biological psychiatry global open science Psychiatry and Mental Health
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
91 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信