{"title":"Risk assessment of metal/bio-based nanopesticides: Plant growth, soil environment, and non-target organisms","authors":"Jiabao Wu, Ningke Fan, Huimin Liao, Yejia Zhang, Zhenggao Xiao, Zhenyu Wang","doi":"10.1039/d4en00941j","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The increasing use of nanopesticides in agriculture has raised concerns about their potential environmental health risks. Herein, we evaluate and compare the effects of metal-based nano-copper oxide (nCuO) and bio-based nano-chitosan (nCS) on tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.) plant growth, soil environment, and non-target organisms (tadpoles). Our results showed that both nCS and nCuO significantly enhanced tomato seedling elongation, shoot and root biomass. Regarding soil health, the low concentration of nCS (10 mg/kg, nCS10) and nCuO (0.1 mg/kg, nCuO0.1) did not affect soil pH, but nCS10 increased soil total carbon (28.0%) and total nitrogen content (64.9%), and nCuO0.1 resulted in the increase in Cu content (104.5%) and decrease in sulfur content. For high concentrations, nCuO (1 mg/kg, nCuO1) and nCS (100 mg/kg, nCS100) both led to a reduction in sulfur without significantly impacting soil enzyme activity. Besides, nCS increased the abundance of beneficial bacteria (Aeromicrobium and Streptomyces) without impairing soil microbial functions, whereas nCuO treatment increased the abundance of Sphingomonas, Streptomyces, and Lysobacter, as well as decreased Iamia, Altererythrobacter, and Vicinamibacteraceae, crucial for nutrient cycling, thus undermining soil metabolic processes. In terms of non-target organism toxicity, although nCS100 exposure induced CAT decline and MDA increase resulting in lower survival rates (50.2%) of tadpoles than nCuO1 (63.2%), both treatments had higher survival rates than conventional pesticides (copper guanidine acetate). Altogether, our research underscores the multifaceted risks of nanopesticides on plants, soils, organisms, offering valuable perspectives for their potential use and the advancement of safer, environmentally friendly alternatives to nanopesticides.","PeriodicalId":73,"journal":{"name":"Environmental Science: Nano","volume":"10 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental Science: Nano","FirstCategoryId":"6","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1039/d4en00941j","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The increasing use of nanopesticides in agriculture has raised concerns about their potential environmental health risks. Herein, we evaluate and compare the effects of metal-based nano-copper oxide (nCuO) and bio-based nano-chitosan (nCS) on tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.) plant growth, soil environment, and non-target organisms (tadpoles). Our results showed that both nCS and nCuO significantly enhanced tomato seedling elongation, shoot and root biomass. Regarding soil health, the low concentration of nCS (10 mg/kg, nCS10) and nCuO (0.1 mg/kg, nCuO0.1) did not affect soil pH, but nCS10 increased soil total carbon (28.0%) and total nitrogen content (64.9%), and nCuO0.1 resulted in the increase in Cu content (104.5%) and decrease in sulfur content. For high concentrations, nCuO (1 mg/kg, nCuO1) and nCS (100 mg/kg, nCS100) both led to a reduction in sulfur without significantly impacting soil enzyme activity. Besides, nCS increased the abundance of beneficial bacteria (Aeromicrobium and Streptomyces) without impairing soil microbial functions, whereas nCuO treatment increased the abundance of Sphingomonas, Streptomyces, and Lysobacter, as well as decreased Iamia, Altererythrobacter, and Vicinamibacteraceae, crucial for nutrient cycling, thus undermining soil metabolic processes. In terms of non-target organism toxicity, although nCS100 exposure induced CAT decline and MDA increase resulting in lower survival rates (50.2%) of tadpoles than nCuO1 (63.2%), both treatments had higher survival rates than conventional pesticides (copper guanidine acetate). Altogether, our research underscores the multifaceted risks of nanopesticides on plants, soils, organisms, offering valuable perspectives for their potential use and the advancement of safer, environmentally friendly alternatives to nanopesticides.
期刊介绍:
Environmental Science: Nano serves as a comprehensive and high-impact peer-reviewed source of information on the design and demonstration of engineered nanomaterials for environment-based applications. It also covers the interactions between engineered, natural, and incidental nanomaterials with biological and environmental systems. This scope includes, but is not limited to, the following topic areas:
Novel nanomaterial-based applications for water, air, soil, food, and energy sustainability
Nanomaterial interactions with biological systems and nanotoxicology
Environmental fate, reactivity, and transformations of nanoscale materials
Nanoscale processes in the environment
Sustainable nanotechnology including rational nanomaterial design, life cycle assessment, risk/benefit analysis