Socioeconomic analysis of glaucoma patients regarding treatment options.

Adin Mahmuljin, Aida Pidro Gadzo, Ajla Pidro Miokovic, Selma Hasimbegovic, Amela Dzubur Alic
{"title":"Socioeconomic analysis of glaucoma patients regarding treatment options.","authors":"Adin Mahmuljin, Aida Pidro Gadzo, Ajla Pidro Miokovic, Selma Hasimbegovic, Amela Dzubur Alic","doi":"10.22336/rjo.2024.70","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To present a socioeconomic analysis of glaucoma patients regarding glaucoma treatment options.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This is a prospective, comparative cross-sectional study. One hundred twenty glaucoma patients were divided into three groups. In group one, 40 patients were treated with topical therapy; group two consisted of 40 patients who had previously undergone laser therapy for glaucoma treatment; and group three had 40 patients who had undergone glaucoma surgical therapy. Data were collected using questionnaires. The data obtained by the survey were entered into the database and analyzed in the statistical program \"SPSS\". The difference between the examined groups was analyzed using the \"Mann-Whitney test\", and the statistical significance of the difference was analyzed using the \"Hi-square test\".</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Out of 120 patients, 65 were females, and 56 were males with a mean age of 55,6 ± 11,9 years with a range of 24-83 years. Based on the type of treatment, on average, the youngest were patients in group 2 (51.2 ± 8.3 years, range 31-66 years), followed by group 3 (55.2 ± 12.6 years, range 29-82 years), and the oldest were patients in group 1 (60.3 ± 12.6 years, range 24-83 years). Statistical analysis using the \"Man-Whitney U\" test showed that there was a statistically significant difference in the average age by type of treatment (p < 0.05). Other socioeconomic factors did not show statistically significant differences among groups.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Our study highlighted the interplay between socioeconomic factors and treatment choices in glaucoma management. Younger, more informed patients were more likely to opt for newer therapies like laser treatment, while older patients often relied on traditional methods. Identifying these patterns is crucial for tailoring screening programs, optimizing treatment protocols, and improving overall patient outcomes.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our study demonstrates few socioeconomic differences between patients in different types of glaucoma treatment.</p>","PeriodicalId":94355,"journal":{"name":"Romanian journal of ophthalmology","volume":"68 4","pages":"385-390"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11809829/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Romanian journal of ophthalmology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22336/rjo.2024.70","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To present a socioeconomic analysis of glaucoma patients regarding glaucoma treatment options.

Methods: This is a prospective, comparative cross-sectional study. One hundred twenty glaucoma patients were divided into three groups. In group one, 40 patients were treated with topical therapy; group two consisted of 40 patients who had previously undergone laser therapy for glaucoma treatment; and group three had 40 patients who had undergone glaucoma surgical therapy. Data were collected using questionnaires. The data obtained by the survey were entered into the database and analyzed in the statistical program "SPSS". The difference between the examined groups was analyzed using the "Mann-Whitney test", and the statistical significance of the difference was analyzed using the "Hi-square test".

Results: Out of 120 patients, 65 were females, and 56 were males with a mean age of 55,6 ± 11,9 years with a range of 24-83 years. Based on the type of treatment, on average, the youngest were patients in group 2 (51.2 ± 8.3 years, range 31-66 years), followed by group 3 (55.2 ± 12.6 years, range 29-82 years), and the oldest were patients in group 1 (60.3 ± 12.6 years, range 24-83 years). Statistical analysis using the "Man-Whitney U" test showed that there was a statistically significant difference in the average age by type of treatment (p < 0.05). Other socioeconomic factors did not show statistically significant differences among groups.

Discussion: Our study highlighted the interplay between socioeconomic factors and treatment choices in glaucoma management. Younger, more informed patients were more likely to opt for newer therapies like laser treatment, while older patients often relied on traditional methods. Identifying these patterns is crucial for tailoring screening programs, optimizing treatment protocols, and improving overall patient outcomes.

Conclusion: Our study demonstrates few socioeconomic differences between patients in different types of glaucoma treatment.

青光眼患者治疗方案的社会经济分析。
目的:对青光眼患者的治疗方案进行社会经济分析。方法:这是一项前瞻性,比较横断面研究。120例青光眼患者分为三组。第一组40例患者采用局部治疗;第二组为40例既往接受过青光眼激光治疗的患者;第三组有40名患者接受了青光眼手术治疗。通过问卷调查收集数据。调查得到的数据被录入数据库,并在统计程序“SPSS”中进行分析。采用“Mann-Whitney检验”分析各组间差异,采用“高方检验”分析差异的统计学意义。结果:120例患者中,女性65例,男性56例,平均年龄55,6±11,9岁,年龄范围24 ~ 83岁。根据治疗方式不同,2组患者平均年龄最小(51.2±8.3岁,范围31 ~ 66岁),3组患者平均年龄最小(55.2±12.6岁,范围29 ~ 82岁),1组患者平均年龄最大(60.3±12.6岁,范围24 ~ 83岁)。采用“Man-Whitney U”检验进行统计分析,不同治疗方式的平均年龄差异有统计学意义(p < 0.05)。其他社会经济因素在群体之间没有统计学上的显著差异。讨论:我们的研究强调了社会经济因素与青光眼治疗选择之间的相互作用。更年轻、更了解情况的患者更有可能选择激光治疗等新疗法,而年龄较大的患者往往依赖于传统方法。识别这些模式对于制定筛查方案、优化治疗方案和改善患者整体预后至关重要。结论:我们的研究表明不同类型青光眼治疗患者的社会经济差异不大。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信