Twenty-four Hour Ambulatory Blood Pressure Monitoring in Open Angle Glaucoma Suspects: A cross-sectional descriptive study.

Mahesh Bharathi, Subashini Kaliaperumal, Sandhiya Selvarajan, Renuka Srinivasan, Mary Stephen
{"title":"Twenty-four Hour Ambulatory Blood Pressure Monitoring in Open Angle Glaucoma Suspects: A cross-sectional descriptive study.","authors":"Mahesh Bharathi, Subashini Kaliaperumal, Sandhiya Selvarajan, Renuka Srinivasan, Mary Stephen","doi":"10.22336/rjo.2024.71","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To compare glaucoma suspects' 24-hour blood pressure pattern with healthy subjects and the Retinal Nerve Fibre Layer (RNFL) thickness among dippers and non-dippers.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>We included 100 patients diagnosed as glaucoma suspects in the study group and 100 age and gender-matched controls. Twenty-four-hour ambulatory blood pressure (BP) was measured using an automated BP monitoring device for mean systolic BP (SBP), mean diastolic BP (DBP), and mean arterial pressure (MAP). We classified patients into non-dippers, dippers, and overt dippers based on reduction in nocturnal MAP. Structural damage to the optic nerve head was studied by measuring the superior, inferior, and average RNFL thickness on Optical Coherence Tomography (OCT).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Glaucoma suspects showed lower values of day, night, and mean SBP values but higher values of day, night, and mean DBP values when compared with controls, and these were statistically significant. ANOVA and Post Hoc test (Bonferroni) analysis among glaucoma suspects showed that overt dippers had statistically significant superior, inferior, and average RNFL thinning (average 86.20 ± 12.200 µm) as compared to non-dippers and dippers (average 105 ± 11.183 and 102.19 ± 9.582 µm respectively). Pearson's correlation, used to assess the relationship between the nocturnal dip in BP and average RNFL thickness, showed a negative correlation (r = -0.396, p < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Our study found a statistically significant decrease in systolic blood pressure day and night and an increase in diastolic blood pressure day and night in glaucoma suspects compared to normal. Mean arterial pressure did not show any significant difference, and the data obtained is comparable with previous studies. The corresponding retinal nerve fiber layer changes noted in dippers and non-dippers were also similar to those in the existing literature. This study, however, has a shortcoming of not including intraocular pressure-related nerve head changes.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Nocturnal BP reduction was associated with structural damage to the optic nerve head in glaucoma suspects, suggesting systemic vascular etiology in the damage progression. ABP monitoring can help detect those glaucoma suspects who are mainly likely to progress so that they can be on close follow-up.</p>","PeriodicalId":94355,"journal":{"name":"Romanian journal of ophthalmology","volume":"68 4","pages":"391-397"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11809820/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Romanian journal of ophthalmology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22336/rjo.2024.71","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: To compare glaucoma suspects' 24-hour blood pressure pattern with healthy subjects and the Retinal Nerve Fibre Layer (RNFL) thickness among dippers and non-dippers.

Materials and methods: We included 100 patients diagnosed as glaucoma suspects in the study group and 100 age and gender-matched controls. Twenty-four-hour ambulatory blood pressure (BP) was measured using an automated BP monitoring device for mean systolic BP (SBP), mean diastolic BP (DBP), and mean arterial pressure (MAP). We classified patients into non-dippers, dippers, and overt dippers based on reduction in nocturnal MAP. Structural damage to the optic nerve head was studied by measuring the superior, inferior, and average RNFL thickness on Optical Coherence Tomography (OCT).

Results: Glaucoma suspects showed lower values of day, night, and mean SBP values but higher values of day, night, and mean DBP values when compared with controls, and these were statistically significant. ANOVA and Post Hoc test (Bonferroni) analysis among glaucoma suspects showed that overt dippers had statistically significant superior, inferior, and average RNFL thinning (average 86.20 ± 12.200 µm) as compared to non-dippers and dippers (average 105 ± 11.183 and 102.19 ± 9.582 µm respectively). Pearson's correlation, used to assess the relationship between the nocturnal dip in BP and average RNFL thickness, showed a negative correlation (r = -0.396, p < 0.001).

Discussion: Our study found a statistically significant decrease in systolic blood pressure day and night and an increase in diastolic blood pressure day and night in glaucoma suspects compared to normal. Mean arterial pressure did not show any significant difference, and the data obtained is comparable with previous studies. The corresponding retinal nerve fiber layer changes noted in dippers and non-dippers were also similar to those in the existing literature. This study, however, has a shortcoming of not including intraocular pressure-related nerve head changes.

Conclusion: Nocturnal BP reduction was associated with structural damage to the optic nerve head in glaucoma suspects, suggesting systemic vascular etiology in the damage progression. ABP monitoring can help detect those glaucoma suspects who are mainly likely to progress so that they can be on close follow-up.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信