Exacerbating risk in human-ignited large fires over western United States due to lower flammability thresholds and greenhouse gas emissions.

IF 2.2 Q2 MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES
PNAS nexus Pub Date : 2025-02-11 eCollection Date: 2025-02-01 DOI:10.1093/pnasnexus/pgaf012
Fa Li, Qing Zhu, Kunxiaojia Yuan, Huanping Huang, Volker C Radeloff, Min Chen
{"title":"Exacerbating risk in human-ignited large fires over western United States due to lower flammability thresholds and greenhouse gas emissions.","authors":"Fa Li, Qing Zhu, Kunxiaojia Yuan, Huanping Huang, Volker C Radeloff, Min Chen","doi":"10.1093/pnasnexus/pgaf012","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Large fires in the western United States become highly probable when dry conditions surpass critical thresholds of vapor pressure deficit (VPD<sub>t</sub>). VPD<sub>t</sub> likely differs between human- and lightning-ignited fires, potentially leading to ignition-type varied responses of fire weather risk to natural variability and various anthropogenic forcings, yet a comprehensive quantification remains lacking. Here, through fire observations with ignition types and a machine learning method, we found that human-ignited large fires had consistently lower thresholds (VPD<sub>t</sub>) across western US ecoregions. Consequently, the annual number of flammable days (when VPD > VPD<sub>t</sub>) for human-caused large fires was 93% higher on average and increased 21% more rapidly than those caused by lightning during 1979-2020. Through robust statistical detection and attribution of Earth System Models, we found that the anthropogenic greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions predominantly (81%) controlled the human-related flammable day increases, which was 18% greater than the effect of GHGs on the increases in lightning-related flammable days. Such ignition-type varied fire weather risk indicates more large fire-prone conditions for human-regulated fire regimes when GHG emissions are enhancing and ignitions are not limited by fuels.</p>","PeriodicalId":74468,"journal":{"name":"PNAS nexus","volume":"4 2","pages":"pgaf012"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11812050/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"PNAS nexus","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/pnasnexus/pgaf012","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Large fires in the western United States become highly probable when dry conditions surpass critical thresholds of vapor pressure deficit (VPDt). VPDt likely differs between human- and lightning-ignited fires, potentially leading to ignition-type varied responses of fire weather risk to natural variability and various anthropogenic forcings, yet a comprehensive quantification remains lacking. Here, through fire observations with ignition types and a machine learning method, we found that human-ignited large fires had consistently lower thresholds (VPDt) across western US ecoregions. Consequently, the annual number of flammable days (when VPD > VPDt) for human-caused large fires was 93% higher on average and increased 21% more rapidly than those caused by lightning during 1979-2020. Through robust statistical detection and attribution of Earth System Models, we found that the anthropogenic greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions predominantly (81%) controlled the human-related flammable day increases, which was 18% greater than the effect of GHGs on the increases in lightning-related flammable days. Such ignition-type varied fire weather risk indicates more large fire-prone conditions for human-regulated fire regimes when GHG emissions are enhancing and ignitions are not limited by fuels.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信