Scaling in branch thickness and the fractal aesthetic of trees.

IF 2.2 Q2 MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES
PNAS nexus Pub Date : 2025-02-11 eCollection Date: 2025-02-01 DOI:10.1093/pnasnexus/pgaf003
Jingyi Gao, Mitchell G Newberry
{"title":"Scaling in branch thickness and the fractal aesthetic of trees.","authors":"Jingyi Gao, Mitchell G Newberry","doi":"10.1093/pnasnexus/pgaf003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Leonardo da Vinci left guidelines for painting trees that have inspired landscape painters and tree physiologists alike, yet his prescriptions depend on a parameter, <i>α</i>, now known as the radius scaling exponent in self-similar branching. While da Vinci seems to imply <math><mi>α</mi> <mo>=</mo> <mn>2</mn></math> , contemporary vascular biology considers other exponents such as the case of <math><mi>α</mi> <mo>=</mo> <mn>3</mn></math> known as Murray's Law. Here we extend da Vinci's theory of proportion to measure <i>α</i> in works of art, enabling comparison to modern tree physiology and fractal geometry. We explain how <i>α</i> determines proportions among branches and visual complexity, which in turn influence the fractal dimension <i>D</i>. We measure <i>α</i> in classic works of art drawn from 16th century Islamic architecture, Edo period Japanese painting and 20th century abstract art. We find <i>α</i> in the range 1.5 to 2.8 corresponding to the range of natural trees, as well as conformity and deviations from ideal branching that create stylistic effect or accommodate design and implementation constraints. Piet Mondrian's cubist abstract <i>Gray Tree</i> furthermore foregoes explicit branching but conforms to the theoretically predicted distribution of branch thickness with <math><mi>α</mi> <mo>=</mo> <mn>2.8</mn></math> , suggesting that realistic scaling is as important as branching in conveying the form of a tree.</p>","PeriodicalId":74468,"journal":{"name":"PNAS nexus","volume":"4 2","pages":"pgaf003"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11812039/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"PNAS nexus","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/pnasnexus/pgaf003","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Leonardo da Vinci left guidelines for painting trees that have inspired landscape painters and tree physiologists alike, yet his prescriptions depend on a parameter, α, now known as the radius scaling exponent in self-similar branching. While da Vinci seems to imply α = 2 , contemporary vascular biology considers other exponents such as the case of α = 3 known as Murray's Law. Here we extend da Vinci's theory of proportion to measure α in works of art, enabling comparison to modern tree physiology and fractal geometry. We explain how α determines proportions among branches and visual complexity, which in turn influence the fractal dimension D. We measure α in classic works of art drawn from 16th century Islamic architecture, Edo period Japanese painting and 20th century abstract art. We find α in the range 1.5 to 2.8 corresponding to the range of natural trees, as well as conformity and deviations from ideal branching that create stylistic effect or accommodate design and implementation constraints. Piet Mondrian's cubist abstract Gray Tree furthermore foregoes explicit branching but conforms to the theoretically predicted distribution of branch thickness with α = 2.8 , suggesting that realistic scaling is as important as branching in conveying the form of a tree.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信