Genomic Differences in Thyroid Cancers From Primary Sites Versus Distant Metastases in Individual Patients: A Clinical Perspective and Preliminary Report.

IF 2.3 3区 医学 Q1 OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY
Yen-Bo Lin, Hsiang-Wei Hu, An-Ko Chung, Jin-Ying Lu, Wan-Chen Wu, I-Hsuan Chiu, I Chu, Chia-Chi Lin, Jih-Hsiang Lee, Feng-Jung Nien, Kuen-Yuan Chen, Ming-Hsun Wu, Chun-Nan Chen, Chun-Wei Wang, Ting-Chun Kuo, Chia-Hung Lin, Mei-Fang Cheng, Wei-Yih Chiu, Shuenn-Wen Kuo, Wen-Hui Hsih, Chih-Yuan Wang, Wei-Shiung Yang, Pei-Lung Chen, Shyang-Rong Shih
{"title":"Genomic Differences in Thyroid Cancers From Primary Sites Versus Distant Metastases in Individual Patients: A Clinical Perspective and Preliminary Report.","authors":"Yen-Bo Lin, Hsiang-Wei Hu, An-Ko Chung, Jin-Ying Lu, Wan-Chen Wu, I-Hsuan Chiu, I Chu, Chia-Chi Lin, Jih-Hsiang Lee, Feng-Jung Nien, Kuen-Yuan Chen, Ming-Hsun Wu, Chun-Nan Chen, Chun-Wei Wang, Ting-Chun Kuo, Chia-Hung Lin, Mei-Fang Cheng, Wei-Yih Chiu, Shuenn-Wen Kuo, Wen-Hui Hsih, Chih-Yuan Wang, Wei-Shiung Yang, Pei-Lung Chen, Shyang-Rong Shih","doi":"10.1002/hed.28100","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Distant metastasis is a leading cause of thyroid cancer (TC)-related deaths. Genetic profiling is typically limited to one sample per patient due to cost and sampling-risk concerns. Differences between samples from thyroid and distant metastasis within individual patients are unclear.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients with TC and distant metastasis were recruited for genetic analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Using a TC-specific NGS panel, 66 specimens from 29 patients were analyzed, identifying 16 mutations and 4 fusions, including two novel fusions (FGFR2-SHTN1 and RFTN1-BRAF). Genetic alterations differed between primary and metastatic sites in nine patients (31%), predominantly in additional oncogenic alterations (89%). More genetic alterations were found at the primary site in three patients and metastatic sites in four. Distinct mutations were found in two patients. A longer time interval between specimen acquisitions was significantly associated with genetic discrepancies (p = 0.032).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Patterns of genetic discrepancies between primary and metastatic TC vary, offering valuable insights for clinical practice.</p>","PeriodicalId":55072,"journal":{"name":"Head and Neck-Journal for the Sciences and Specialties of the Head and Neck","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Head and Neck-Journal for the Sciences and Specialties of the Head and Neck","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/hed.28100","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Distant metastasis is a leading cause of thyroid cancer (TC)-related deaths. Genetic profiling is typically limited to one sample per patient due to cost and sampling-risk concerns. Differences between samples from thyroid and distant metastasis within individual patients are unclear.

Methods: Patients with TC and distant metastasis were recruited for genetic analysis.

Results: Using a TC-specific NGS panel, 66 specimens from 29 patients were analyzed, identifying 16 mutations and 4 fusions, including two novel fusions (FGFR2-SHTN1 and RFTN1-BRAF). Genetic alterations differed between primary and metastatic sites in nine patients (31%), predominantly in additional oncogenic alterations (89%). More genetic alterations were found at the primary site in three patients and metastatic sites in four. Distinct mutations were found in two patients. A longer time interval between specimen acquisitions was significantly associated with genetic discrepancies (p = 0.032).

Conclusion: Patterns of genetic discrepancies between primary and metastatic TC vary, offering valuable insights for clinical practice.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.00
自引率
6.90%
发文量
278
审稿时长
1.6 months
期刊介绍: Head & Neck is an international multidisciplinary publication of original contributions concerning the diagnosis and management of diseases of the head and neck. This area involves the overlapping interests and expertise of several surgical and medical specialties, including general surgery, neurosurgery, otolaryngology, plastic surgery, oral surgery, dermatology, ophthalmology, pathology, radiotherapy, medical oncology, and the corresponding basic sciences.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信