Learning dynamics of muscle synergies during non-biomimetic control maps.

IF 3.4 Q2 ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL
Wearable technologies Pub Date : 2025-01-20 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1017/wtc.2024.24
King Chun Tse, Patricia Capsi-Morales, Cristina Piazza
{"title":"Learning dynamics of muscle synergies during non-biomimetic control maps.","authors":"King Chun Tse, Patricia Capsi-Morales, Cristina Piazza","doi":"10.1017/wtc.2024.24","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Advanced myoelectric prostheses feature multiple degrees of freedom (DoFs) and sophisticated control algorithms that interpret user motor intentions as commands. While enhancing their capability to assist users in a wide range of daily activities, these control solutions still pose challenges. Among them, the need for extensive learning periods and users' limited control proficiency. To investigate the relationship between these challenges and the limited alignment of such methods with human motor control strategies, we examine motor learning processes in two different control maps testing a synergistic myoelectric system. In particular, this work employs a DoF-wise synergies control algorithm tested in both intuitive and non-intuitive control mappings. Intuitive mapping aligns body movements with control actions to replicate natural limb control, whereas non-intuitive mapping (or non-biomimetic) lacks a direct correlation between aspects, allowing one body movement to influence multiple DoFs. The latter offers increased design flexibility through redundancy, which can be especially advantageous for individuals with motor disabilities. The study evaluates the effectiveness and learning process of both control mappings with 10 able-bodied participants. The results revealed distinct patterns observed while testing the two maps. Furthermore, muscle synergies exhibited greater stability and distinction by the end of the experiment, indicative of varied learning processes.</p>","PeriodicalId":75318,"journal":{"name":"Wearable technologies","volume":"6 ","pages":"e1"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11810517/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Wearable technologies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/wtc.2024.24","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Advanced myoelectric prostheses feature multiple degrees of freedom (DoFs) and sophisticated control algorithms that interpret user motor intentions as commands. While enhancing their capability to assist users in a wide range of daily activities, these control solutions still pose challenges. Among them, the need for extensive learning periods and users' limited control proficiency. To investigate the relationship between these challenges and the limited alignment of such methods with human motor control strategies, we examine motor learning processes in two different control maps testing a synergistic myoelectric system. In particular, this work employs a DoF-wise synergies control algorithm tested in both intuitive and non-intuitive control mappings. Intuitive mapping aligns body movements with control actions to replicate natural limb control, whereas non-intuitive mapping (or non-biomimetic) lacks a direct correlation between aspects, allowing one body movement to influence multiple DoFs. The latter offers increased design flexibility through redundancy, which can be especially advantageous for individuals with motor disabilities. The study evaluates the effectiveness and learning process of both control mappings with 10 able-bodied participants. The results revealed distinct patterns observed while testing the two maps. Furthermore, muscle synergies exhibited greater stability and distinction by the end of the experiment, indicative of varied learning processes.

非仿生控制地图中肌肉协同作用的学习动力学。
先进的肌电假肢具有多个自由度(DoFs)和复杂的控制算法,可以将用户的运动意图解释为命令。虽然这些控制解决方案增强了它们在广泛的日常活动中帮助用户的能力,但仍然存在挑战。其中,需要较长的学习周期和用户有限的控制熟练程度。为了研究这些挑战与这些方法与人类运动控制策略的有限一致性之间的关系,我们在测试协同肌电系统的两种不同控制图中检查了运动学习过程。特别地,这项工作采用了一种dof智能协同控制算法,在直观和非直观的控制映射中进行了测试。直观映射将身体运动与控制动作对齐,以复制自然肢体控制,而非直观映射(或非仿生)缺乏各方面之间的直接相关性,允许一个身体运动影响多个自由度。后者通过冗余提供了更高的设计灵活性,这对有运动障碍的个人尤其有利。本研究以10名身体健全的参与者为对象,评估了这两种控制映射的有效性和学习过程。结果揭示了在测试这两张地图时观察到的不同模式。此外,肌肉协同作用在实验结束时表现出更大的稳定性和差异性,表明不同的学习过程。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
11 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信