Use of a self-perception questionnaire for screening auditory abilities in children with behavioral dysphonia.

IF 0.9 Q4 AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY
CoDAS Pub Date : 2025-02-10 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1590/2317-1782/e20230314pt
Ana Carolina Pinto Lemos, Tamy Nathalia Tanaka, Ana Carolina Constantini, Rebecca Christina Kathleen Maunsell, Maria Isabel Ramos do Amaral
{"title":"Use of a self-perception questionnaire for screening auditory abilities in children with behavioral dysphonia.","authors":"Ana Carolina Pinto Lemos, Tamy Nathalia Tanaka, Ana Carolina Constantini, Rebecca Christina Kathleen Maunsell, Maria Isabel Ramos do Amaral","doi":"10.1590/2317-1782/e20230314pt","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To discuss the use of a self-perception questionnaire on auditory abilities applied to children with behavioral dysphonia and compare it with the perception of auditory and voice symptoms, as well as with performance in temporal tests of auditory processing.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>17 children, aged 6-8 years, with a diagnosis of behavioral dysphonia. Individuals with peripheral hearing loss, severe visual and/or language impairments or neurodevelopmental disorders were excluded. The following instruments were applied: pediatric voice symptoms questionnaire (PVSQ, brazilian validated version); questionnaire of self-perception auditory skills (QAPAC) inserted into the online program AudBility with its self-assessment and parental versions; basic audiological evaluation and the temporal tests Random Gap Detection (RGDT), and Frequency Pattern (FPT). Parents' and children's responses were compared and Spearman's correlation measured correlation between the QAPAC and the PVSQ, as well as between questionnaires and temporal tests.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>QAPAC self-assessment version showed a mean score of 45.5±7.4, wherein seven (41.2%) children scored below the risk criteria for Central Auditory Processing Disorder (CAPD). The mean score on the parental version was 39.5±10.5, with 11 (64.7%) responses falling below the risk criteria. Parents' mean score was statistically lower (worse) compared to that of the children (p<0.005). A strong correlation was found between the self-assessment versions of QAPAC and PVSQ (r=0.671), alongside the parental versions (r=0.722). A poorer performance of the left ear in comparison to the right ear was observed in the FPT test (p<0.005), and a moderate correlation between QAPAC and FPT in the left ear during the imitation phase was noted (r=0.597).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The use of self-perception questionnaire on auditory abilities is a valid contribution to initial voice assessment in children with behavioral dysphonia.</p>","PeriodicalId":46547,"journal":{"name":"CoDAS","volume":"37 2","pages":"e20230314"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11841558/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"CoDAS","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1590/2317-1782/e20230314pt","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: To discuss the use of a self-perception questionnaire on auditory abilities applied to children with behavioral dysphonia and compare it with the perception of auditory and voice symptoms, as well as with performance in temporal tests of auditory processing.

Methods: 17 children, aged 6-8 years, with a diagnosis of behavioral dysphonia. Individuals with peripheral hearing loss, severe visual and/or language impairments or neurodevelopmental disorders were excluded. The following instruments were applied: pediatric voice symptoms questionnaire (PVSQ, brazilian validated version); questionnaire of self-perception auditory skills (QAPAC) inserted into the online program AudBility with its self-assessment and parental versions; basic audiological evaluation and the temporal tests Random Gap Detection (RGDT), and Frequency Pattern (FPT). Parents' and children's responses were compared and Spearman's correlation measured correlation between the QAPAC and the PVSQ, as well as between questionnaires and temporal tests.

Results: QAPAC self-assessment version showed a mean score of 45.5±7.4, wherein seven (41.2%) children scored below the risk criteria for Central Auditory Processing Disorder (CAPD). The mean score on the parental version was 39.5±10.5, with 11 (64.7%) responses falling below the risk criteria. Parents' mean score was statistically lower (worse) compared to that of the children (p<0.005). A strong correlation was found between the self-assessment versions of QAPAC and PVSQ (r=0.671), alongside the parental versions (r=0.722). A poorer performance of the left ear in comparison to the right ear was observed in the FPT test (p<0.005), and a moderate correlation between QAPAC and FPT in the left ear during the imitation phase was noted (r=0.597).

Conclusion: The use of self-perception questionnaire on auditory abilities is a valid contribution to initial voice assessment in children with behavioral dysphonia.

使用自我知觉问卷筛选行为性语音障碍儿童的听觉能力。
目的:探讨行为语音障碍儿童听觉能力自我知觉问卷的应用,并将其与对听觉和声音症状的知觉以及听觉加工时间测试的表现进行比较。方法:17例儿童,年龄6-8岁,诊断为行为障碍。排除外周听力损失、严重视觉和/或语言障碍或神经发育障碍的个体。使用了以下工具:儿童声音症状问卷(PVSQ,巴西验证版);在在线节目《audability》中插入自我感知听觉技能问卷(QAPAC),并附有自评版和家长版;基本听力学评估和时间测试随机间隙检测(RGDT)和频率模式(FPT)。比较父母和儿童的反应,Spearman相关测量QAPAC与PVSQ之间的相关性,以及问卷与时间测试之间的相关性。结果:QAPAC自评版平均得分为45.5±7.4分,其中7名(41.2%)儿童得分低于中枢性听觉加工障碍(CAPD)风险标准。父母版本的平均得分为39.5±10.5分,11例(64.7%)应答低于风险标准。父母的平均得分较儿童低(差)(p)。结论:使用听力能力自我知觉问卷对行为语音障碍儿童的初始语音评估有有效的贡献。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CoDAS
CoDAS AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY-
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
12.50%
发文量
103
审稿时长
30 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信