Exploring healthcare workers' immunisation behaviour towards COVID-19 vaccines through psychological patterns.

IF 1.7 Q4 PRIMARY HEALTH CARE
Nour El Houda Benkaddour, Sara Ramdani, Hind Khalil, Asmae Lekfif, Naima Abda, Bouchra Oneib, Yassamine Bentata
{"title":"Exploring healthcare workers' immunisation behaviour towards COVID-19 vaccines through psychological patterns.","authors":"Nour El Houda Benkaddour, Sara Ramdani, Hind Khalil, Asmae Lekfif, Naima Abda, Bouchra Oneib, Yassamine Bentata","doi":"10.4102/phcfm.v17i1.4710","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong> The psychological approach can provide valuable insights into vaccination behaviour, especially in high-risk contexts. It offers new perspectives for effective interventions to improve vaccination behaviour.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong> To investigate key factors influencing stress related to vaccination in emergency situations among healthcare professionals.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong> Eastern region of Morocco.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong> We conducted a descriptive and analytical cross-sectional study involving 221 healthcare professionals in the Eastern region of Morocco. A snowball sampling method was used to select the participants who were administered a questionnaire. Logistic regression analysis was performed with p  0.05 being the level of statistical significance.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong> The participants had a median age of 25.5 years (30-34.5) and were predominantly females (68.3%). Vaccination coverage stood at 84.6%, with a positive perception of 77.8%. The analysis of the Perceived Stress Scale (PSS) revealed that 51.6% (n = 114) of healthcare professionals experienced stress towards vaccination. Females were almost two times more susceptible to experiencing vaccination stress (p = 0.03). Furthermore, the analysis showed that vaccination profile (p = 0.02), accepting the vaccine for any reason other than its accessibility (p = 0.03) and having a previous coronavirus disease 2019 infection (p = 0.03), were significantly associated with stress. In contrast, healthcare professionals based at the university hospital had a significantly lower stress level (p = 0.01).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong> Moroccan healthcare professionals exhibited high vaccine acceptance and positive perceptions, particularly among vaccinated individuals despite notable stress around immunisation.Contribution: These insights can guide governments and policymakers in developing strategies to enhance healthcare workers' awareness and understanding of vaccination.</p>","PeriodicalId":47037,"journal":{"name":"African Journal of Primary Health Care & Family Medicine","volume":"17 1","pages":"e1-e11"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11830875/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"African Journal of Primary Health Care & Family Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4102/phcfm.v17i1.4710","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PRIMARY HEALTH CARE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background:  The psychological approach can provide valuable insights into vaccination behaviour, especially in high-risk contexts. It offers new perspectives for effective interventions to improve vaccination behaviour.

Aim:  To investigate key factors influencing stress related to vaccination in emergency situations among healthcare professionals.

Setting:  Eastern region of Morocco.

Methods:  We conducted a descriptive and analytical cross-sectional study involving 221 healthcare professionals in the Eastern region of Morocco. A snowball sampling method was used to select the participants who were administered a questionnaire. Logistic regression analysis was performed with p  0.05 being the level of statistical significance.

Results:  The participants had a median age of 25.5 years (30-34.5) and were predominantly females (68.3%). Vaccination coverage stood at 84.6%, with a positive perception of 77.8%. The analysis of the Perceived Stress Scale (PSS) revealed that 51.6% (n = 114) of healthcare professionals experienced stress towards vaccination. Females were almost two times more susceptible to experiencing vaccination stress (p = 0.03). Furthermore, the analysis showed that vaccination profile (p = 0.02), accepting the vaccine for any reason other than its accessibility (p = 0.03) and having a previous coronavirus disease 2019 infection (p = 0.03), were significantly associated with stress. In contrast, healthcare professionals based at the university hospital had a significantly lower stress level (p = 0.01).

Conclusion:  Moroccan healthcare professionals exhibited high vaccine acceptance and positive perceptions, particularly among vaccinated individuals despite notable stress around immunisation.Contribution: These insights can guide governments and policymakers in developing strategies to enhance healthcare workers' awareness and understanding of vaccination.

通过心理模式探讨医护人员对COVID-19疫苗的免疫行为。
背景:心理学方法可以为疫苗接种行为提供有价值的见解,特别是在高危环境中。它为改善疫苗接种行为的有效干预提供了新的视角。目的:探讨影响医务人员在紧急情况下接种疫苗应激的关键因素。环境:摩洛哥东部地区。方法:我们对摩洛哥东部地区221名卫生保健专业人员进行了描述性和分析性横断面研究。采用滚雪球抽样法选择参与者,并对他们进行问卷调查。采用Logistic回归分析,p 0.05为差异有统计学意义。结果:参与者的中位年龄为25.5岁(30-34.5岁),以女性为主(68.3%)。疫苗接种率为84.6%,正面认知为77.8%。感知压力量表(PSS)分析显示,51.6% (n = 114)的卫生保健专业人员对疫苗接种有压力。女性对疫苗接种压力的易感性几乎是男性的两倍(p = 0.03)。此外,分析显示,疫苗接种情况(p = 0.02)、因可获得性以外的任何原因接受疫苗(p = 0.03)以及之前感染过2019冠状病毒疾病(p = 0.03)与压力显著相关。相比之下,大学医院的医护人员的压力水平明显较低(p = 0.01)。结论:摩洛哥卫生保健专业人员表现出较高的疫苗接受度和积极的看法,特别是在接种疫苗的个人中,尽管免疫接种有明显的压力。贡献:这些见解可以指导政府和决策者制定战略,以提高卫生保健工作者对疫苗接种的认识和理解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
10.00%
发文量
81
审稿时长
15 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信