Survey of Diabetes Technology in the Pediatric Inpatient Setting.

Q2 Medicine
Abby B Hamilton, Nitya Rajagopal, Chloe Ngo, Amy D Hendrix-Dicken, Shelly Mercer, Michelle Condren
{"title":"Survey of Diabetes Technology in the Pediatric Inpatient Setting.","authors":"Abby B Hamilton, Nitya Rajagopal, Chloe Ngo, Amy D Hendrix-Dicken, Shelly Mercer, Michelle Condren","doi":"10.5863/1551-6776-30.1.123","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Advances in diabetes technology have led to increasing use of insulin pumps and continuous glucose monitors (CGMs) to improve the quality of life for children with diabetes. The objective of this study was to assess the percentage of hospitals that had policies regarding the use of diabetes technology in the pediatric inpatient setting and assess the content of policies to identify specific areas for improvement.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A diabetes technology survey was developed by a multidisciplinary research team, consisting of 3 domains including CGM use/policies, insulin pump use/policies, and demographics. It was distributed to the pharmacist membership of the Pediatric Pharmacy Association in August 2022. Descriptive statistics were conducted to describe current practices/policies.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Seventeen of the 31 responding hospitals (55%) allowed CGM use in the pediatric inpatient setting with 77% (n = 13) having written policies. Primary barriers to use included lack of policy (n = 11, 79%), knowledgeable staff (n = 10, 71%), and electronic health record (EHR) integration (n = 6, 43%). More than half reported not using CGM alarms for high and low blood sugar levels (n = 10, 59%). More hospitals allowed insulin pump use (n = 29, 94%) with 97% (n = 28) reporting written policies. Less than half had specific policies for suspected pump site failure (n = 13, 46%). Only 60% reported that nurses verify insulin pump doses given.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study demonstrates there is room to improve both the existence and content of policies related to CGM and insulin pump use in hospitals.</p>","PeriodicalId":37484,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Pediatric Pharmacology and Therapeutics","volume":"30 1","pages":"123-128"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11809535/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Pediatric Pharmacology and Therapeutics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5863/1551-6776-30.1.123","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/10 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Advances in diabetes technology have led to increasing use of insulin pumps and continuous glucose monitors (CGMs) to improve the quality of life for children with diabetes. The objective of this study was to assess the percentage of hospitals that had policies regarding the use of diabetes technology in the pediatric inpatient setting and assess the content of policies to identify specific areas for improvement.

Methods: A diabetes technology survey was developed by a multidisciplinary research team, consisting of 3 domains including CGM use/policies, insulin pump use/policies, and demographics. It was distributed to the pharmacist membership of the Pediatric Pharmacy Association in August 2022. Descriptive statistics were conducted to describe current practices/policies.

Results: Seventeen of the 31 responding hospitals (55%) allowed CGM use in the pediatric inpatient setting with 77% (n = 13) having written policies. Primary barriers to use included lack of policy (n = 11, 79%), knowledgeable staff (n = 10, 71%), and electronic health record (EHR) integration (n = 6, 43%). More than half reported not using CGM alarms for high and low blood sugar levels (n = 10, 59%). More hospitals allowed insulin pump use (n = 29, 94%) with 97% (n = 28) reporting written policies. Less than half had specific policies for suspected pump site failure (n = 13, 46%). Only 60% reported that nurses verify insulin pump doses given.

Conclusion: This study demonstrates there is room to improve both the existence and content of policies related to CGM and insulin pump use in hospitals.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Pediatric Pharmacology and Therapeutics
Journal of Pediatric Pharmacology and Therapeutics Medicine-Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
90
期刊介绍: The Journal of Pediatric Pharmacology and Therapeutics is the official journal of the Pediatric Pharmacy Advocacy Group. JPPT is a peer-reviewed multi disciplinary journal that is devoted to promoting the safe and effective use of medications in infants and children. To this end, the journal publishes practical information for all practitioners who provide care to pediatric patients. Each issue includes review articles, original clinical investigations, case reports, editorials, and other information relevant to pediatric medication therapy. The Journal focuses all work on issues related to the practice of pediatric pharmacology and therapeutics. The scope of content includes pharmacotherapy, extemporaneous compounding, dosing, methods of medication administration, medication error prevention, and legislative issues. The Journal will contain original research, review articles, short subjects, case reports, clinical investigations, editorials, and news from such organizations as the Pediatric Pharmacy Advocacy Group, the FDA, the American Academy of Pediatrics, the American Society of Health-System Pharmacists, and so on.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信