Multicenter analysis of endoscopic full-thickness resection for gastrointestinal lesions in Poland.

IF 1.6 4区 医学 Q3 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY
Pawel Rogalski, Wojciech Korcz, Nastazja Dagny Pilonis, Jacek Drzewiecki, Andrzej Bialek, Marta Minkiewicz, Andrzej Baniukiewicz, Andrzej Dabrowski, Michal Jozwa, Piotr Gietka, Piotr Krolikowski, Maciej Gonciarz, Mateusz Jagielski, Marek Jackowski, Jakub Szlak, Wladyslaw Januszewicz, Michal Filip Kaminski
{"title":"Multicenter analysis of endoscopic full-thickness resection for gastrointestinal lesions in Poland.","authors":"Pawel Rogalski, Wojciech Korcz, Nastazja Dagny Pilonis, Jacek Drzewiecki, Andrzej Bialek, Marta Minkiewicz, Andrzej Baniukiewicz, Andrzej Dabrowski, Michal Jozwa, Piotr Gietka, Piotr Krolikowski, Maciej Gonciarz, Mateusz Jagielski, Marek Jackowski, Jakub Szlak, Wladyslaw Januszewicz, Michal Filip Kaminski","doi":"10.1080/00365521.2025.2463950","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The full thickness resection is an innovative technique that enables non-exposed endoscopic full-thickness resection (EFTR) of superficial and subepithelial gastrointestinal lesions. This retrospective, multicenter study evaluated the effectiveness and safety of EFTR in gastroduodenal and colorectal resections.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Data from 105 consecutive EFTR procedures at 6 Polish endoscopic centers were analyzed. Patients were divided into three groups: 'difficult adenoma', adenocarcinoma, or subepithelial lesion (SEL). Outcomes assessed were R0 resection and adverse event rates, with subgroup analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The study included 105 patients (mean age: 67 ± 10.3 years; 59% male): 48 (46%) with 'difficult adenoma', 31 (30%) with adenocarcinoma, and 26 (25%) with SEL. Of these, 82 patients (78%) underwent colorectal EFTR, while 23 (22%) underwent gastroduodenal EFTR. Technical success was achieved in 101 procedures (96%), with a median time of 30 (20; 40) minutes. Among the technically successful EFTRs, R0 resection was confirmed in 86 patients (97%): 18 (95%) in the SEL group, 45 (100%) in the 'difficult adenoma' group, and 23 (92%) in the adenocarcinoma group (<i>p</i> = 0.1806). In 13 EFTR procedures (13%), a scar from a previous endoscopic resection was removed without any pathological lesion. Curative resections were obtained in 21 (88%) patients in the SEL group and 20 (67%) patients in the adenocarcinoma group (<i>p</i> = 0.0001). Clinical adverse events occurred in 12 patients (11%): Clavien-Dindo grade I (5%), II (2%), and IIIb (5%).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>EFTR is reasonably safe and effective for resection of colorectal and gastroduodenal lesions, which would otherwise most likely require surgical treatment.</p>","PeriodicalId":21461,"journal":{"name":"Scandinavian Journal of Gastroenterology","volume":" ","pages":"1-10"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Scandinavian Journal of Gastroenterology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00365521.2025.2463950","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: The full thickness resection is an innovative technique that enables non-exposed endoscopic full-thickness resection (EFTR) of superficial and subepithelial gastrointestinal lesions. This retrospective, multicenter study evaluated the effectiveness and safety of EFTR in gastroduodenal and colorectal resections.

Materials and methods: Data from 105 consecutive EFTR procedures at 6 Polish endoscopic centers were analyzed. Patients were divided into three groups: 'difficult adenoma', adenocarcinoma, or subepithelial lesion (SEL). Outcomes assessed were R0 resection and adverse event rates, with subgroup analysis.

Results: The study included 105 patients (mean age: 67 ± 10.3 years; 59% male): 48 (46%) with 'difficult adenoma', 31 (30%) with adenocarcinoma, and 26 (25%) with SEL. Of these, 82 patients (78%) underwent colorectal EFTR, while 23 (22%) underwent gastroduodenal EFTR. Technical success was achieved in 101 procedures (96%), with a median time of 30 (20; 40) minutes. Among the technically successful EFTRs, R0 resection was confirmed in 86 patients (97%): 18 (95%) in the SEL group, 45 (100%) in the 'difficult adenoma' group, and 23 (92%) in the adenocarcinoma group (p = 0.1806). In 13 EFTR procedures (13%), a scar from a previous endoscopic resection was removed without any pathological lesion. Curative resections were obtained in 21 (88%) patients in the SEL group and 20 (67%) patients in the adenocarcinoma group (p = 0.0001). Clinical adverse events occurred in 12 patients (11%): Clavien-Dindo grade I (5%), II (2%), and IIIb (5%).

Conclusions: EFTR is reasonably safe and effective for resection of colorectal and gastroduodenal lesions, which would otherwise most likely require surgical treatment.

波兰内镜胃肠道病变全层切除术的多中心分析。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
5.30%
发文量
222
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Scandinavian Journal of Gastroenterology is one of the most important journals for international medical research in gastroenterology and hepatology with international contributors, Editorial Board, and distribution
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信