Efficacy of compound betamethasone combined with ropivacaine in iliac fascial space nerve block analgesia.

IF 3.9 2区 综合性期刊 Q1 MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES
Fan Miao, Huimiao Wang, Zhong Liu, Kexin Wang, Wanling Wang, Xinhe Guo, Chenjia Zhang, Chao Yu, Tu Shen
{"title":"Efficacy of compound betamethasone combined with ropivacaine in iliac fascial space nerve block analgesia.","authors":"Fan Miao, Huimiao Wang, Zhong Liu, Kexin Wang, Wanling Wang, Xinhe Guo, Chenjia Zhang, Chao Yu, Tu Shen","doi":"10.1038/s41598-025-85512-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>To explore the anesthetic efficacy of ropivacaine combined with compound betamethasone in iliac fascial space nerve block analgesia (IFNBA) in patients receiving artificial femoral head replacement (AFHR), and to provide a theoretical basis for the selection of clinical anesthetic drugs. From January 2022 to June 2022, 70 patients requiring IFNBA analgesia undergoing AFHR surgery at our hospital were included in this prospective study. Using Excel randomization, 70 patients were divided into study group (n = 35) and control group (n = 35). The study group received ropivacaine combined with compound betamethasone analgesia regimen, while the control group only received ropivacaine analgesia regimen. In addition to patients' general baseline clinical characteristics, outcomes indicators included preoperative and postoperative visual analogue scale (VAS) pain scores, preoperative and postoperative Ramsay sedation scores, preoperative and postoperative levels of inflammatory cytokines, duration of analgesia and patient satisfaction in both groups were collected. At 12 h and 24 h after surgery, the static and dynamic VAS pain score of the study group was significantly lower than that of the control group (P < 0.05). At 6 h and 12 h after surgery, the Ramsay sedation score of the study group was significantly higher than that of the control group (P < 0.05). The level of inflammatory cytokines in the study group was significantly lower than that in the control group at the completion of surgery, 24 h and 72 h after surgery (P < 0.05). In addition, the study group had a significantly longer duration of postoperative analgesia and significantly better patient satisfaction (P < 0.05). Especially for patients receiving AFHR, in IFNBA, ropivacaine combined with compound betamethasone has better analgesic effect, higher patient satisfaction, and can effectively reduce the level of inflammatory status, which is worthy of clinical application and promotion.</p>","PeriodicalId":21811,"journal":{"name":"Scientific Reports","volume":"15 1","pages":"5139"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11814100/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Scientific Reports","FirstCategoryId":"103","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-85512-2","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"综合性期刊","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

To explore the anesthetic efficacy of ropivacaine combined with compound betamethasone in iliac fascial space nerve block analgesia (IFNBA) in patients receiving artificial femoral head replacement (AFHR), and to provide a theoretical basis for the selection of clinical anesthetic drugs. From January 2022 to June 2022, 70 patients requiring IFNBA analgesia undergoing AFHR surgery at our hospital were included in this prospective study. Using Excel randomization, 70 patients were divided into study group (n = 35) and control group (n = 35). The study group received ropivacaine combined with compound betamethasone analgesia regimen, while the control group only received ropivacaine analgesia regimen. In addition to patients' general baseline clinical characteristics, outcomes indicators included preoperative and postoperative visual analogue scale (VAS) pain scores, preoperative and postoperative Ramsay sedation scores, preoperative and postoperative levels of inflammatory cytokines, duration of analgesia and patient satisfaction in both groups were collected. At 12 h and 24 h after surgery, the static and dynamic VAS pain score of the study group was significantly lower than that of the control group (P < 0.05). At 6 h and 12 h after surgery, the Ramsay sedation score of the study group was significantly higher than that of the control group (P < 0.05). The level of inflammatory cytokines in the study group was significantly lower than that in the control group at the completion of surgery, 24 h and 72 h after surgery (P < 0.05). In addition, the study group had a significantly longer duration of postoperative analgesia and significantly better patient satisfaction (P < 0.05). Especially for patients receiving AFHR, in IFNBA, ropivacaine combined with compound betamethasone has better analgesic effect, higher patient satisfaction, and can effectively reduce the level of inflammatory status, which is worthy of clinical application and promotion.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

复方倍他米松联合罗哌卡因用于髂筋膜间隙神经阻滞镇痛的疗效观察。
探讨罗哌卡因联合复方倍他米松在人工股骨头置换术(AFHR)患者髂筋膜间隙神经阻滞镇痛(IFNBA)中的麻醉效果,为临床麻醉药物的选择提供理论依据。本前瞻性研究纳入2022年1月至2022年6月在我院行AFHR手术的70例需要IFNBA镇痛的患者。采用Excel随机化方法将70例患者分为研究组(n = 35)和对照组(n = 35)。研究组采用罗哌卡因联合复方倍他米松镇痛方案,对照组仅采用罗哌卡因镇痛方案。除了患者的一般基线临床特征外,还收集两组患者术前和术后视觉模拟评分(VAS)疼痛评分、术前和术后Ramsay镇静评分、术前和术后炎症因子水平、镇痛持续时间和患者满意度。术后12 h和24 h,研究组静态和动态VAS疼痛评分均显著低于对照组(P
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Scientific Reports
Scientific Reports Natural Science Disciplines-
CiteScore
7.50
自引率
4.30%
发文量
19567
审稿时长
3.9 months
期刊介绍: We publish original research from all areas of the natural sciences, psychology, medicine and engineering. You can learn more about what we publish by browsing our specific scientific subject areas below or explore Scientific Reports by browsing all articles and collections. Scientific Reports has a 2-year impact factor: 4.380 (2021), and is the 6th most-cited journal in the world, with more than 540,000 citations in 2020 (Clarivate Analytics, 2021). •Engineering Engineering covers all aspects of engineering, technology, and applied science. It plays a crucial role in the development of technologies to address some of the world''s biggest challenges, helping to save lives and improve the way we live. •Physical sciences Physical sciences are those academic disciplines that aim to uncover the underlying laws of nature — often written in the language of mathematics. It is a collective term for areas of study including astronomy, chemistry, materials science and physics. •Earth and environmental sciences Earth and environmental sciences cover all aspects of Earth and planetary science and broadly encompass solid Earth processes, surface and atmospheric dynamics, Earth system history, climate and climate change, marine and freshwater systems, and ecology. It also considers the interactions between humans and these systems. •Biological sciences Biological sciences encompass all the divisions of natural sciences examining various aspects of vital processes. The concept includes anatomy, physiology, cell biology, biochemistry and biophysics, and covers all organisms from microorganisms, animals to plants. •Health sciences The health sciences study health, disease and healthcare. This field of study aims to develop knowledge, interventions and technology for use in healthcare to improve the treatment of patients.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信