Association between neutrophil percentage to albumin ratio and short term prognosis of acute on chronic liver failure treated with artificial liver support system.
{"title":"Association between neutrophil percentage to albumin ratio and short term prognosis of acute on chronic liver failure treated with artificial liver support system.","authors":"Yuanji Ma, Lingyao Du, Lang Bai, Hong Tang","doi":"10.1038/s41598-025-89832-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The impact of neutrophil percentage-to-albumin ratio (NPAR) on the outcome of acute-on-chronic liver failure (ACLF) is scant. A retrospective cohort study was conducted in patients with ACLF treated with artificial liver support system (ALSS). The ACLF was diagnosed according to the Chinese Group on the Study of Severe Hepatitis B-ACLF (COSSH ACLF) criteria. Disease severity was rated according to the COSSH ACLF score. Restricted cubic splines, linear or Cox regression models were used to investigate the relationships of baseline NPAR with disease severity and 90-day prognosis. The 90-day transplant-free and overall survival rates of 258 eligible patients were 58.5% and 66.3%, respectively. The NPAR in transplant-free survivors was lower than that in transplant or death patients (22.8 ± 4.4 vs. 25.3 ± 3.7, P < 0.001). NPAR was positively associated with COSSH ACLF score (adjusted β (95% CI) > 0, P < 0.001), transplant-free survival (adjusted HR (95% CI) for transplant or death: 1.07 (1.02-1.13), P = 0.007), and overall survival (adjusted HR (95% CI) for death: 1.09 (1.03-1.15), P = 0.003). Patients with NPAR ≥ 22.4 had poor 90-day prognosis compared to the rest (all adjusted HR (95% CI) > 1, P < 0.05). NPAR was positively associated with disease severity and poor short-term prognosis in patients with COSSH ACLF who underwent ALSS treatment. Thus, it could be used as a prognostic biomarker for COSSH ACLF.</p>","PeriodicalId":21811,"journal":{"name":"Scientific Reports","volume":"15 1","pages":"5042"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11814120/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Scientific Reports","FirstCategoryId":"103","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-89832-1","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"综合性期刊","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The impact of neutrophil percentage-to-albumin ratio (NPAR) on the outcome of acute-on-chronic liver failure (ACLF) is scant. A retrospective cohort study was conducted in patients with ACLF treated with artificial liver support system (ALSS). The ACLF was diagnosed according to the Chinese Group on the Study of Severe Hepatitis B-ACLF (COSSH ACLF) criteria. Disease severity was rated according to the COSSH ACLF score. Restricted cubic splines, linear or Cox regression models were used to investigate the relationships of baseline NPAR with disease severity and 90-day prognosis. The 90-day transplant-free and overall survival rates of 258 eligible patients were 58.5% and 66.3%, respectively. The NPAR in transplant-free survivors was lower than that in transplant or death patients (22.8 ± 4.4 vs. 25.3 ± 3.7, P < 0.001). NPAR was positively associated with COSSH ACLF score (adjusted β (95% CI) > 0, P < 0.001), transplant-free survival (adjusted HR (95% CI) for transplant or death: 1.07 (1.02-1.13), P = 0.007), and overall survival (adjusted HR (95% CI) for death: 1.09 (1.03-1.15), P = 0.003). Patients with NPAR ≥ 22.4 had poor 90-day prognosis compared to the rest (all adjusted HR (95% CI) > 1, P < 0.05). NPAR was positively associated with disease severity and poor short-term prognosis in patients with COSSH ACLF who underwent ALSS treatment. Thus, it could be used as a prognostic biomarker for COSSH ACLF.
期刊介绍:
We publish original research from all areas of the natural sciences, psychology, medicine and engineering. You can learn more about what we publish by browsing our specific scientific subject areas below or explore Scientific Reports by browsing all articles and collections.
Scientific Reports has a 2-year impact factor: 4.380 (2021), and is the 6th most-cited journal in the world, with more than 540,000 citations in 2020 (Clarivate Analytics, 2021).
•Engineering
Engineering covers all aspects of engineering, technology, and applied science. It plays a crucial role in the development of technologies to address some of the world''s biggest challenges, helping to save lives and improve the way we live.
•Physical sciences
Physical sciences are those academic disciplines that aim to uncover the underlying laws of nature — often written in the language of mathematics. It is a collective term for areas of study including astronomy, chemistry, materials science and physics.
•Earth and environmental sciences
Earth and environmental sciences cover all aspects of Earth and planetary science and broadly encompass solid Earth processes, surface and atmospheric dynamics, Earth system history, climate and climate change, marine and freshwater systems, and ecology. It also considers the interactions between humans and these systems.
•Biological sciences
Biological sciences encompass all the divisions of natural sciences examining various aspects of vital processes. The concept includes anatomy, physiology, cell biology, biochemistry and biophysics, and covers all organisms from microorganisms, animals to plants.
•Health sciences
The health sciences study health, disease and healthcare. This field of study aims to develop knowledge, interventions and technology for use in healthcare to improve the treatment of patients.